PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2024
The relationship between patient-reported and objective measures of physical function among cancer survivors receiving rehabilitation care: A correlation analysis.
Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oza S, Kramer A, Ying J, Cushman DM
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Physical function is associated with cancer-related quality of life and survival. The correlation of patient-reported and objective measures of physical function has not been quantified previously in the cancer rehabilitation medicine setting.
OBJECTIVE: To correlate patient-reported physical function with objective measures of physical function. The secondary aim is to correlate fatigue and social participation levels with objective measures of physical function.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Tertiary university cancer center.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 226 cancer survivors referred to an outpatient cancer rehabilitation medicine clinic.
INTERVENTION: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cancer Function Brief 3D Profile domains with objective physical function measured by the 30-second sit-to-stand and hand grip strength.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis revealed a moderate correlation between patient-reported physical function and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (r = 0.57; p <.001), and a weak correlation of patient-reported physical function and handgrip strength (r = 0.27; p <.001). Multivariable regression modeling controlling for age, gender, and receipt of systemic therapy demonstrated a significant association between patient-reported physical function and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (estimated confidence interval 0.76 [0.60, 0.92], p < .01), in addition to patient-reported function and handgrip strength (estimated 0.22 [0.10, 0.34], p < .01). Multiple myeloma but no other cancer type was inversely associated with lower physical function.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported physical function correlated moderately with the 30-second sit-to-stand test, whereas hand grip strength demonstrated a weak correlation. The 30-second sit-to-stand test is a suitable substitute for patient-reported physical function. Further work evaluating how measures relate to each other across cancer populations is needed before recommending a standardized set of outcome measures.
OBJECTIVE: To correlate patient-reported physical function with objective measures of physical function. The secondary aim is to correlate fatigue and social participation levels with objective measures of physical function.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Tertiary university cancer center.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 226 cancer survivors referred to an outpatient cancer rehabilitation medicine clinic.
INTERVENTION: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cancer Function Brief 3D Profile domains with objective physical function measured by the 30-second sit-to-stand and hand grip strength.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis revealed a moderate correlation between patient-reported physical function and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (r = 0.57; p <.001), and a weak correlation of patient-reported physical function and handgrip strength (r = 0.27; p <.001). Multivariable regression modeling controlling for age, gender, and receipt of systemic therapy demonstrated a significant association between patient-reported physical function and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (estimated confidence interval 0.76 [0.60, 0.92], p < .01), in addition to patient-reported function and handgrip strength (estimated 0.22 [0.10, 0.34], p < .01). Multiple myeloma but no other cancer type was inversely associated with lower physical function.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported physical function correlated moderately with the 30-second sit-to-stand test, whereas hand grip strength demonstrated a weak correlation. The 30-second sit-to-stand test is a suitable substitute for patient-reported physical function. Further work evaluating how measures relate to each other across cancer populations is needed before recommending a standardized set of outcome measures.