Cultural Adaptation of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Hindi for Use with Patients with Cancer in Community Palliative Care Settings.

INTRODUCTION

Palliative care in India began almost four decades ago but the service structure is still evolving. In Indian settings, palliative care services are mainly directed to patients with cancer as palliative care has been made a part of ‘Mission Flexipool’ under the National Health Mission under the umbrella of non-communicable disease control programmes. The terminal cases of cancer are one of the major target beneficiary groups under the National Programme for Palliative Care. [ 1 ] These services are provided through various models of palliative care, namely (i) pain and palliative medicine centres, (ii) home care units of the hospitals, (iii) day care centres, (iv) hospice care, and (v) community-based home care model. In India, community-based palliative care services are mainly provided by charity organisations or home care units of hospitals. A proactive approach is being used wherein a multidisciplinary team of professionals consisting of a doctor, nurse, and counsellor visits the patient’s home and offer symptom management and psychosocial support services to patients and their family.

Patients with cancer have numerous physical and emotional concerns which may give rise to unresolved anxieties and depressive symptoms. [ 2 , 3 ] Literature suggests that the prevalence of anxiety among cancer patients ranges from 1.4% [ 4 ] to 37% [ 5 , 6 ] and depression from 4.5% to 58%. [ 2 , 6 , 7 ] Patients with untreated depression or anxiety may be less likely to continue good health habits and may withdraw from family or other social support systems complicating their situation. [ 3 ] It is widely acknowledged that assessing patients’ feelings and symptoms are important component of patient-centred care and contributes to improving their health-related quality of life. [ 8 - 11 ] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are well suited for objective assessment as patients report their concerns in a guided manner leaving less scope for missing concerns. [ 12 - 15 ] However, it is important that PROMs are target language-specific and that their cultural equivalence and appropriateness are assessed before they are put into practice. [ 16 - 20 ] The cross-cultural adaptation of an instrument requires a careful linguistic translation including cultural equivalence and psychometric validation following the standard guidelines but it is essential to ensure that the translated and validated version remains similar to the original tool to allow data pooling from cross-cultural and multinational studies. [ 17 , 21 - 23 ]

In Indian settings, a few instruments, namely, Health Questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, General 21, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) are available in Hindi language and demonstrated their use with patients with cancer but to the best of our knowledge, none of the scales is yet validated for use in cancer community palliative care setting. In community palliative care settings, the majority of the patients are at the advanced stage of their cancer with high symptom load which requires a brief PROM appropriate to the setting. The PHQ-9 Hindi version, though is a brief instrument, but has not been tested for Indian community palliative care settings. The cultural equivalence of the Hindi version of PHQ-9, its appropriateness, and validity with the Hindi-speaking population in North India receiving palliative care services is required to be tested. This research aims to assess the cultural equivalence of PHQ-9 Hindi for use with patients with cancer receiving community palliative care services in North India.

Setting

The research was implemented by one of the NGOs providing palliative care services to patients with cancer in a community setting in North India. Ethics permission was obtained by the Institutional Ethics Committee-Human Research of the concerned NGO through a letter dated 23 May 2022.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We obtained permission for cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of PHQ-9 from the original developers of the scale through an email dated 3 May 2022. Based on the standard methodology of translation and adaptation of the scale by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer and PROM guidelines, [ 17 , 18 , 24 ] we used the following stages for testing cultural equivalence and adaptation of the PHQ-9 Hindi version. We skipped the back-and-forth translation stages as the scale was already available in the target language and shared by the original developer to carry on further cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. The three-stage process was followed: Stage I: Cognitive interviewing with experts (professionals from the field) Stage II: Cognitive interviewing with patients Stage III: Research team review.

Stage I cognitive interviewing with palliative care professionals through focus group discussion (FGD)

Two FGDs were conducted with professionals having expertise in the field of palliative care. Professionals working with palliative care teams of the NGO offering palliative home care services were invited telephonically for the FGD. Those agreeing to participate were invited to FGD in the NGO head office.

A total of 17 professionals participated in FGD, one group consisted of eight professionals while another group had nine professionals. An FGD guide was prepared to discuss and analyse each item of the original translation. The FGD guide aimed to explore any difficult word, comprehension of the item, if the word conveys the appropriate meaning to the target patient group, how would professionals like to change the word or add any word to convey a better meaning of the given phrase in the original version [ Appendix 1 ]. The specific questions in FGD included: ‘any item difficult to understand’, ‘Why does the word look difficult or what meaning does the word communicate’ and ‘How would you like to replace the word or like to add any word to give the same meaning when compared to the original English item’. The discussion was facilitated by PI (TB) as moderator, audio recorded, in addition, and hand recorded by other researchers (NA, AP, and PC). Each FGD took about 1 and ½ hours. TB and NA listened to the item-wise audio recording repeatedly and supplemented the same with hand notes for analysis.

Stage II: Cognitive interviewing with patients through face-to-face interviews

A total of 11 Hindi-speaking adult patients with cancer receiving home-based palliative care services were interviewed using an in-depth interview guide at their homes [ Appendix 2 ]. Prior verbal permission was sought by the treating team through telephone calls, those agreeing to be interviewed were visited by the PI along with the treating team at the patient’s convenience time and interviewed at their home. An in-depth interview guide was prepared to understand the patient’s comprehension of each item, any difficult word to understand, how they would like to change the word, and suitability of the item to respond to the given response categories. Patients were also asked to compare the ease of understanding between the original PHQ Hindi with the changes introduced in the items after FGD with professionals. All interviews were conducted by the single researcher (TB) and interviews were stopped after interviewing a sample of 11 patients as saturation in responses was achieved. All interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim for item-wise content analysis.

Stage III: Research team review

The PI (TB) and Co-PI (NA) discussed item-wise responses of the professionals and patients comparing the same with the original Hindi PHQ phrase until a consensus was achieved to effect changes in the PHQ-9 phrases. A final adapted version was produced which is given in [ Appendix 3 ].

Sample and sampling procedures

Professionals with at least 1 year of experience in the palliative care field were invited to participate in FGD. A total of 11 adult Hindi-speaking patients (>18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer were recruited through non-probability sampling techniques from home care teams as well as the day-care centre of the organisation. Patients from home care teams were recruited by the team counsellor who telephonically obtained consent from the patient while patients coming to the day-care centre gave in-person consent to the co-PI (AP). Patients were then interviewed by the PI at a mutually convenient time in the patient’s home or day-care centre of the organisation.

Analysis

All interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed with the help of student volunteers. The researchers independently cross-checked the transcription randomly to ensure rigour in the process. Any errors were corrected after repeated listening to the same track by two researchers together. Item-wise content analysis was used for process recording and presenting results as well as discussion to facilitate transparency in the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 17 professionals and 11 patients participated in FGD and in-depth interviewing, respectively. Details of the professionals and patient participants are given in [ Tables 1 and 2 ], respectively. The multidisciplinary professional team including doctors, nurses, counsellors and social workers participated in FGD. Ten professionals had more than 10 years of work experience.

Patients who participated in the study were diagnosed with cancer at least a year ago, most were working and educated at least till 8 th standard. Patients with different cancer types were included in the study.

A few of the items which were difficult to understand, comprehend and conveyed ambiguous meanings in the original Hindi version of PHQ-9 were – ‘ dilchaspi ’, ‘ maza aana ’, ‘ kuch karne mein ’, ‘ avasadgrast ’, ‘ kam urja hona ’, ‘ nakaam insaan ’, ‘ parivaar ko neecha dikhaya ’ and ‘ asthir ’. A few phrases that though considered appropriate by the professionals but could not convey clear meaning to the patients were – ‘ Rozmarrah ’ which was changed to ‘ rojana ’ meaning daily. Patients also felt the use of ‘ nakaam ’ and ‘ parivar ko neecha dikhana ’ was offensive and inappropriate in their cultural context.

Minor changes were made in items no. 1, 2, 4, and 6 while major changes were made in item no. 7 and 8. A single word, namely ‘ Bahut ’ meaning ‘very much’ was added in item no. 5 to emphasise the given behaviour in the original item. A synonym for a single word, namely ‘ tareeke se/tareh se ’ instead of ‘ dhang se ’, and the tense orientation of two words, namely ‘ mar jaye ’ instead of ‘ mar jate ’ and ‘ Achha hoga ’ instead of ‘ Achha hota ’ in item no. 9 were changed. Thus, the sentence structure in item no. 9 was changed to future orientation instead of past orientation as given in the original PHQ. Item no. 3 was retained as it is. Items no. 3 and 5 in the PHQ questionnaire were comprehended well by the patients.

The comprehension of item no. 7 by the patients was directed towards entertainment instead of concentration thus requiring explanation. Item no. 7 was considered incomplete both by professionals and patients in the present context so other words such as ‘ mobile chalana ’, ‘ gana sunna ’ and ‘ kitaab padhna ’ were introduced in the item. Item no. 8 was found to be very long to recall for the patient. The researcher had to break the given item into small parts to help patients retain the comprehension of all the words in the sentence; even then the patients were not able to recall the entire meaning of the sentence. This reflected the need to cut short a few words in item no. 8. The research team deliberated at length during the review stage and decided to drop a few words to shorten the given item from 32 words to 21 words. In the central item given at the end of the questionnaire, ‘self-care’ was missing which was an important and foremost task for the patient before doing any other tasks of daily routine. Thus, the phrase ‘ khud ka dhyaan rakhna ’ was added to the given item.

DISCUSSION

We presented a culturally adapted version of PHQ-9 for use with patients with cancer in north Indian palliative care settings. The Hindi version of PHQ-9 which has previously shown good reliability and validity [ 9 , 10 , 21 , 25 ] was presented to both medical professionals and patients to test its cultural equivalence. Results indicated that words in a few items were not perceived well and reported comprehension difficulty by health professionals and patients. The previous research also reported that the language in a few PHQ items though technically correct but complex and difficult to comprehend. [ 25 ] We reported each item-wise adaption process along with discussion points forwarded by the professionals and patients for identifying difficult phrases and bringing required alterations in PHQ-9 items [ Box 1 ]. Item-wise comparison of the PHQ-9 original Hindi version with the current adapted version is presented in [ Appendix 4 ].

The first item, namely ‘ Kuch karne mein bahut kam dilchaspi ya maza aana ’ made both professionals and patients uncomfortable. Most of the professionals felt that the word ‘ dilchaspi ’ may not be understood by everyone as it’s not very commonly used in day-to-day language. Further, ‘ dilchaspi ’ and ‘ Maza aana ’ both words carry a fun orientation. Instead, professionals suggested words like ‘ sukoon ’ or ‘ man lagna ’, as better alternatives to replace the given words. Another difficult word in item no. 1 was ‘ kuch karne mein ’ as it did not clear what work/task it refers to, which may let a person wonder which work he/she is asked for. The professionals suggested that ‘ Rozmarrah ke kuch kaam karne main ’ to give clear meaning to what is being referred to here and the item was unanimously changed to ‘ Rozmarrah ke kuch kaam karne mein bahut kam man lagna ’. The changed item when asked the patients, four of them [ 4 ] could not understand the phrase ‘ Rozmarrah ’. They comprehended it as ‘dying every day’ and suggested using the word ‘ Rozana ’ instead. Other patients also agreed to the new word, that is, ‘Rozana’. This suggested the change in language shift in India from region to region as migrating people carry their language and culture with varied notions [ 26 , 27 ] which need to be considered while translating and culturally adapting the items. Thus, the first item was finally adapted as: Rozana ke kuch kaam karne mein bahot kam man lagna .

For the second item of PHQ was ‘ Udas, avasadgrast ya nirash mehsoos karna ’, professionals felt ‘ avasadgrast ’ is one of the very difficult words as it’s not being used in daily life, even educated people do not use this word commonly. The idiomatic problem with this phrase was highlighted by previous researchers [ 9 , 28 ] too who reported that a literal meaning of the word may not give a simple, actual, and appropriate meaning. A few replacements of this word suggested by professionals were ‘ dukhi ’, ‘ bebas ’, ‘ majboor ’, ‘ bechain ’, ‘ mann ka bhujha bhujha sa hona ’, and ‘ mann ka dukhi hona ’. Most of the participants later tried to narrow down this list by eliminating a few words like ‘ bebas ’ which was considered as helpless and ‘ bechain ’ as anxiety. The final replacement suggested by professionals was ‘ Man dukhi hona .’ During patients’ interviews, eight participants very clearly indicated that ‘ avasadgrast ’ was beyond their understanding. Thus, the item was changed to ‘ Udas, mann dukhi hona ya nirash mehsoos karna ’ which was easily understood by patients too.

The third item ‘ neend aane ya soye rehne mein pareshaani, ya fir bahut adhik sona ’ did not report any difficult phrase. The item was comprehended quite well by all the professionals and patients confirming no need for changes in the given original item. In the fourth item, ‘ thakaan mehsoos karna ya bahut kam urja hona ’, the phrase ‘ urja ’ was perceived as difficult by the professionals and patients alike as it was not an everyday Hindi language word instead a Hindi literature word which may not be understood by less educated patients. Few alternatives such as ‘ takat ’ and ‘ kamzori ’ were suggested. All professionals voted for ‘ kamzori ’ as patients generally use this word to raise their concerns about lack of energy. Thus, the item was changed to ‘ thakaan mehsoos karna ya bahut kamjori mehsoos karna ’. All the patients comprehended the adapted phrases quite well.

The fifth item ‘ bhookh kam lagna ya zyaada khaana ’ though considered fine by all the professionals; they suggested to prefix ‘ bahut ’ with the last word ‘ zyaada khaana ’. Professionals reasoned that patients with depression might feel either lose their appetite for food or binge eat. In palliative care, patients with cancer usually eat less. Eating more could not be an indicator of depression in this context as it might be recovering from the lost diet. Patients comprehended the original phrase and the adapted phrase equally well but were happy with the adapted version as this posed more emphasis on anything unusual in diet patterns. Thus, the final adapted version was: ‘ Bhookh kam lagna ya bahut zyaaa khana ’.

The 6 th item ‘ Apne bare mein bura mehsoos karna- ya aisa mehsoos karna ki aap nakaam insaan hain aur aapne khud ko aur apne parivaar ko neecha dikhaya hai ’ was regarded as a very lengthy item. ‘ Nakaam ’ word was considered offensive as it was attached with the connotation of failure. Professionals felt that a softer meaning word is required which won’t induce negative feelings to patients. A few alternatives suggested by professionals were bura mehsoos karna’ , ‘ Saksham na hona ’ asafal , and ‘ Kabil nahi ’ Professionals had to refer to the English version of PHQ-9 to choose a meaning-appropriate word, ‘ asafal ’ was chosen unanimously as the best alternative. Another problematic phrase ‘ parivaar ko neecha dikhaya hai ’ might instill a sense of burden and failure in patients. Thus, ‘ parivaar ko nirash kiya hai ’ might be a better replacement which also retains the original meaning. This argument was seconded by one of the patients during in-depth interviewing as he felt offended once the original item was read to him. Other patients also felt the use of ‘ nakaam ’ and ‘ parivar ko neecha dikhana ’ as offensive and inappropriate in their cultural context. The item was finalised as ‘ apne bare mein bura mehsoos karna- ya aisa mehsoos karna ki aap asafak hain aur aapne khud ko aur apne parivaar ko niraash kiya hai ’. The responses of the patients who felt offended by the phrases used in the original PHQ-9 Hindi version suggested that various phrases may carry different meanings and orientations in varied cultures. The phrase in the already available Hindi version had the scope of item bias. Researchers have confirmed that item bias can be produced by many sources such as poor item translation, ambiguities in the original item, linguistic idiosyncrasies, low familiarity, and nuisance associated with the phrase in certain cultures. [ 29 , 30 ]

‘ Akhbaar padhne ya television dekhne jaisi cheez par dhyaan dene mein pareshaani ’ was the seventh item in the original questionnaire. Professionals opined that reading newspapers may not be appropriate in today’s context where it has been mostly replaced by mobile or news channels. Thus, other words such as ‘ mobile chalana ,’ ‘ gana sunna ’ and ‘ kitaab padhna ’ might also be added. Thus, the final adapted item was: ‘ akhbaar padhna, TV dekhna, kitaab padhna, mobile chalana ityaadi par dhyaan dene mein pareshaani .’ Patients thought related to the options given in the adapted version; however, it was experienced that instead of a concentration theme, respondents conceptualised items for hobby or entertainment options. A similar problem was also reported by a previous researcher working with PHQ(9) where the literal translation failed to capture the theme of difficulty in concentration.

The eighth item read as ‘ itna dheeme chalna- firna ya bolna ki logon ka dhyaan jaye ya iska ulta-itna asthir ya bechain hona ki aap samaanya se kaafi zyaada hilte dulte aur chalte firte rahe ’, the phrase ‘ asthir ’ was perceived as a difficult word by the professionals and patients alike as the word is not generally used in daily language. Professionals suggested that words in the item must refer to the behaviour of the patient and not just walking or talking simply. Furthermore, many a time, such behaviour is noticed by the caregiver and not the patient himself, so words must be so framed that even the caregiver can comprehend the same in reference to the patient. Thus, it was suggested to drop subject addressing words like ‘ aap ’. Professionals unanimously suggested changing the item as ‘ kuch kaam ko bahut dheere karna, dheere chalna firna ya dheere bolna ya bahut zyaada bechain rehna aur samaanya se bahut jyada chalte firte rehna ’. In previous research too , ‘moving or speaking so slowly that other people may have noticed’ was not easily related by the glaucoma patients perhaps suggesting that behaviours such as speaking, tone of voice, and walking around are perhaps not common manifestations of depression in Indian context rather may be disease-related physical symptoms. [ 10 ] The item was shortened to ease the recall process. The final adapted item was: ‘ itna dheera chalnaphirna, bolna ki logo ka dhyan jaye ya iska ulta jaise bechan rahena ya bahut jyada chalna phirna ’.

The 9 th item ‘ Aise vichaar ki aap mar jate to acha hota ya kisi dhang se khud ko nuksaan pahunchaana ’ was perceived as fine with a few minor suggestions by professionals about replacing the word ‘ jate ’ with ‘ jayein ’, ‘ hota’ to ‘ hoga ’ and ‘ dhang se ’ to ‘ tarehse ’ to make it future-oriented instead of past orientation. The final item was ‘ Aise vichaar ki aap mar jaye to acha hoga ya kisi tarike se khud ko nuksaan pahunchana ’. All patients comprehended the given adapted version well and related with the feelings confirming the acceptance of the item in the scale.

CONCLUSION

The cultural equivalence of PHQ-9 in the Hindi language to be used with Hindi-speaking patients in a North Indian setting was tested. The Hindi version of PHQ-9 is now available to be used in community palliative care settings. [ Appendix 3 ], though psychometric testing of the tool is underway. Based on our experience with these adaptation and validation exercises, we suggest that professionals take due care while administering PHQ-9 in practice. We suggest that lengthy items like no. 6 and 8 need to be broken into parts to help the patient retain comprehension of all the words in the sentence. The interviewer needs to be careful about the appropriate comprehension of item no. 7 by the patient as it meant to capture concentration and not entertainment or hobby which patients may tend to interpret. The implementation of PHQ-9 will help to early screen depression symptoms among patients with cancer in community palliative care settings and quickly refer the patient to the specialist for timely intervention.

Acknowledgement

We thank all the professionals and patients for their valuable time and input for this study. We also thank CanSupport home care team members Ms. Mausami and Mr. Anil Kumar for arranging a home visit to the patients. We are thankful to student volunteers Nashrah Ali Siddiqui, Praney Aggarwal, Prerita Bahri, and Swastika Borogoain for their support in transcription.

How to cite this article: Bhardwaj T, Arora N, Paul A, Chowdhary P. Cultural Adaptation of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Hindi for Use with Patients with Cancer in Community Palliative Care Settings. Indian J Palliat Care 2023;29:292-311.

Declaration of patient consent

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission obtained for the study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The author(s) confirm that there was no use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using the AI.

1. GOI National Programme for Palliative Care (NPPC) New Delhi, India: National Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2022 Available from: https://www.nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=1047&lid=609 [Last accessed on 2022 Nov 18]

2. Alexander PJ Dinesh N Vidyasagar MS Psychiatric Morbidity among Cancer Patients and its Relationship with Awareness of Illness and Expectations About Treatment Outcome Acta Oncol 1993 32 623 6 10.3109/02841869309092441 8260179

3. Kumar R Singh KK Rae AA Singh RK Singh GR Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Among Cancer Patients J Med Sci Clin Res 2016 4 13696 9 10.18535/jmscr/v4i11.30

4. Chandra PS Chaturvedi SK Kumar A Kumar S Subbakrishna DK Channabasavanna SM et al Awareness of Diagnosis and Psychiatric Morbidity Among Cancer Patients-A Study from South India J Psychosom Res 1998 45 257 61 10.1016/S0022-3999(98)00012-9 9776371

5. Srivastava V Ansari MA Kumar A Shah AG Meena RK Sevach P et al Study of Anxiety and Depression Among Breast Cancer Patients From North India Clin Psychiatr 2016 2 4 10.21767/2471-9854.100017

6. Gopalan MR Karunakaran V Prabhakaran A Jayakumar KL Prevalence of Psychiatric Morbidity Among Cancer Patients-Hospital-based, Cross-Sectional Survey Indian J Psychiatr 2016 58 275 10.4103/0019-5545.191995 28066004 PMC5100118

7. Chaturvedi SK Chandra PS Channabasavanna S Beena M Pandian R Chandra P Detection of Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Patients NIMHANS J 1994 12 141 4

8. Cleeland CS Sloan JA Group AO Assessing the Symptoms of Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (ASCPRO): Searching for Standards J Pain Symptom Manage 2010 39 1077 85 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.025 20538189

9. Shunmugasundaram C Dhillon HM Butow PN Sundaresan P Rutherford C Enabling Cross-Cultural Data Pooling in Trials: Linguistic Validation of Head and Neck Cancer Measures for Indian Patients Qual Life Res 2021 30 2649 61 10.1007/s11136-021-02837-x 33797687

10. Gothwal VK Bagga DK Bharani S Sumalini R Reddy SP The Patient Health Questionnaire-9: Validation among Patients with Glaucoma PLoS One 2014 9 e101295 10.1371/journal.pone.0101295 24999659 PMC4085058

11. Hearn J Higginson IJ Development and Validation of a Core Outcome Measure for Palliative Care: The Palliative Care Outcome Scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group Qual Health Care 1999 8 219 27 10.1136/qshc.8.4.219 10847883 PMC2483665

12. Veronese S Rabitti E Costantini M Valle A Higginson I Translation and Cognitive Testing of the Italian Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) among Patients and Healthcare Professionals PLoS One 2019 14 e0208536 10.1371/journal.pone.0208536 30601810 PMC6314603

13. Spitzer RL Williams J Kroene K Hornyak R Mcmurrax J Validity and Utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Assessment of 3000 ObstetricGynecologic Patients: The PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2000 183 759 69 10.1067/mob.2000.106580 10992206

14. Murtagh FE Ramsenthaler C Firth A Groeneveld EI Lovell N Simon ST et al A Brief, Patient-and Proxy-Reported Outcome Measure in Advanced Illness: Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) Palliat Med 2019 33 1045 57 10.1177/0269216319854264 31185804 PMC6691591

15. Hocaoglu MB Hepgul N Meltem E Efe H Ataoglu B Baybar YL et al Towards Patient-Centred Cancer Care: Cross-Cultural Validity and Responsiveness of the Turkish Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020 18 312 10.1186/s12955-020-01535-5 32962717 PMC7507708

16. Chassany O Sagnier P Marquis P Fullerton S Aaronson N Group ERIoQoLA Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Example of Health-Related Quality of Life-A European Guidance Document for the Improved Integration of Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in the Drug Regulatory Process Drug Inform J 2002 36 209 38 10.1177/009286150203600127

17. Dewolf L Koller M Velikova G Johnson C Scott N Bottomley A et al EORTC Quality of Life Group Translation Procedure 2009 Available from: https://qol.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/translation_manual_2017.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Dec 18]

18. Mckenna SP Wilburn J Thorsen H Brodersen J Adapting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in New Languages and Cultures Rasch Models in Health United States John Wiley and Sons 2012 303 16 10.1002/9781118574454.ch16

19. Al Sayah F Jin X Johnson JA Selection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Use in Health Systems J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021 5 Suppl 2 99 10.1186/s41687-021-00374-2 34637010 PMC8511255

20. Alrubaiy L Hutchings HA Hughes SE Dobbs T Saving Time and Effort: Best Practice for Adapting Existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Hepatology World J Hepatol 2022 14 896 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.896 35721294 PMC9157705

21. Spitzer RL Kroenke K Williams JB Group PHQPCS, Group PHQPCS Validation and Utility of a Self-Report Version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study JAMA 1999 282 1737 44 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 10568646

22. Acquadro C Patrick DL Eremenco S Martin ML Kulis D Correia H et al Emerging Good Practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018 2 1 11 10.1186/s41687-018-0035-8 29757337 PMC5935017

23. Beaton DE Bombardier C Guillemin F Ferraz MB Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures Spine 2000 25 3186 91 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 11124735

24. Antunes B Brown A Witt J Daveson B Ramsenthaler C Benalia H The Palliative Care Outcome Scale Family of Measures; Manual for Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation, London 2012-2018 Available from: https://pos-pal.org/doct/manual_for_cross-cultural_adaption_and_psychometric_testing_of_the_pos_family_of_measures_200715.pdf [Last accessed on 2023 Jan 21]

25. Kochhar P Rajadhyaksha S Suvarna V Translation and Validation of Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Against DSM IV as a Tool to Diagnose Major Depressive Disorder in Indian Patients J Postgrad Med 2007 53 102 10.4103/0022-3859.32209 17495375

26. Fishman JA Language Maintenance and Language Shift as a Field of Inquiry. A Definition of the Field and Suggestions for Its Further development Linguistics 1964 2 32 70 10.1515/ling.1964.2.9.32

27. Laitin DD Migration and Language Shift in Urban India Int J Sociol Lang 1993 103 57 72 10.1515/ijsl.1993.103.57

28. Bhardwaj T Chambers RL Watson H Srividya Higginson IJ Hocaoglu MB Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale in Hindi: Toward Capturing Palliative Needs and Concerns in Hindi Speaking Patients Palliat Med 2023 37 391 401 10.1177/02692163221147076 36719047 PMC10021115

29. Byrne RM Counterfactual Thought Ann Rev Psychol 2016 67 135 57 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249 26393873

30. van de Vijver F Tanzer NK Bias and Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Assessment: An Overview Eur Rev Appl Psychol 2004 54 119 35 10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004

Appendix 1 FGD Guide for professionals

Objective:

• To explore the cognitive processes used by professionals in understanding the item, explore any difficult word and comprehension of the items,

Introduction:

The respondents would be introduced about the study purpose, approximate time of engagement with FGD, and requirement of deeply exploring the comprehension of each item.

- I’m going to read the PHQ 9 Hindi items one be one.

- We will stop and discuss in detail about each question before moving onto the next.

- I will also ask you some more specific things about each question.

- I would also like to know any thoughts or views you might have about the questions.

- In case of any difference of opinion, feel free to refer to original PHQ 9 kept in the center of the group.

------------------------------------------------------ START INTERVIEW ------------------------------

Instruction : Read the item no.1 of PHQ 9 Hindi and discuss the following themes. Repeat the same set of questions for every item.

I . Comprehension:

○ What does the group believe the item to be asking?

○ Is there any difficult word in this item?

○ Why does the word look difficult or what meaning does the word communicate to you?

○ How would you like to replace the word?

○ Any word you would like to add for better meaning?

II . Retrieval:

○ Is the time frame suitable to recall the information asked in the item?

○ Would there be a different time period that would be easier to understand?

III . Response:

○ How would you define the response keys of this question/ your interpretation of the scoring keys?

○ Is it appropriate to select an answer from the options given?

○ Did all options make sense for this item?

IV . Other ( to be asked at the end of all responses):

○ Is there anything else you would like to say about any of the questions? / Questionnaire as a whole?

○ Did you find any of the questions upsetting/ embarrassing / inappropriate?

------------------------------------------------ THANKS --------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------- COMPLETION OF DEMOGRAPHICS CHART------------

Participants (experts’) Characteristics

Appendix 2 Topic Guide to Interview Patient

Patient Health Questionnaire Pilot survey (Phase I)

Objective:

• To explore the cognitive processes used by respondents when reading, interpreting and responding to items on PHQ.

Introduction:

The respondents would be introduced about the study purpose, approximate time of engagement with interview (15 minutes), confidentiality, their right to stop any time and decline any questions

In this study I am less interested in your answers to the questions, but how you arrive at the answers – what you think the question means, and the things you were thinking about when you chose your answer. I would also like to know any thoughts or views you might have about the questions in the last 2 weeks .

--------------------------------------------------- START INTERVIEW --------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------ THANKS --------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------- COMPLETION OF DEMOGRAPHICS FORM ------------------------------------

DEMOGRAPHIC SHEET

Name (optional):

Age:

Gender:

Education:

Occupation:

Cancer type:

How long back your disease was diagnosed:

Residence location:

------------------------------------------------ THANKS --------------------------------------------

Appendix 3

Appendix 4 Comparison of PHQ 9 Original Hindi version versus current adapted version