Introduction
Standard therapeutic modalities for PCN, including autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), have been associated with increased risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) such as acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) [ [1] , [2] , [3] ]. The etiology for the development of these myeloid neoplasms is multifactorial [ 3 ]. In this context, emerging myeloid neoplasms that are clonally related but phenotypically divergent from the antecedent PCN are rarely reported [ 4 ]. This phenomenon is known as trans-differentiation and principally reported in the context of the transformation of B-cell lymphoma to histiocytic neoplasm [ 5 ].We report herein detailed clinicopathologic characteristics of a patient with a long-standing history of PCN who underwent trans-differentiation to clonally related AML with monocytic features involving bone marrow and extramedullary tissue.
Case
The patient was a 70-year-old female with a PCN diagnosed about 5 years before the AML presentation. The patient presented with cytopenia. She had a white blood cell count (WBC) of 1.7 × 10 3 /mcL, hemoglobin (Hgb) level of11.7 g/dl and a normal platelet count. A bone marrow (BM) biopsy was notable for 22 % kappa-restricted monoclonal plasma cells. There was no evidence of myelodysplastic syndrome/neoplasm (MDS) by morphologic and cytogenetic assessments. The karyotype was normal. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed a kappa paraprotein of 1.5 gr/dl with free kappa/lambda ratio of 56.3; renal function and calcium were reportedly normal. There were no lesions in the skeletal survey. Overall, the presentation was consistent with a smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).
Over time, the paraprotein levels increased, and a repeat BM biopsy a year following the initial one, revealed an increase of the monoclonal kappa-restricted plasma cells (54 %). Mutational analysis of the BM was notable for a BRAF mutation; however, further details such as exact variant mutation and variant allele frequency (VAF) are not available to us, and the patient was initially treated with trametinib. Ultimately, the patient underwent induction treatment with 4-cycles of revlimid, velcade, and dexamethasone. The patient achieved good partial response and proceeded to auto-HSCT conditioned with Melphalan 140mg/m 2 . The patient achieved at day 60 post-auto-HSCT near complete remission (nCR) and positive serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE). The patient received ixazomib as maintenance for two years. The patient was then transitioned to daratumumab(monthly), lenalidomide (day 1–21), and dexamethasone due to disease progression. Lenalidomide was discontinued due to myelosuppression. Pancytopenia was persistent, and a PET scan revealed innumerable lytic lesions and the presence of hypermetabolic lymph nodes. Patient received radiation treatment to the femur for pain management.
Hematological parameters worsened; it was noted that her WBC was 1.40 × 10 3 /mcL, Hgb 10.5g/dL, MCV 104fL, and platelet count 42.0 × 10 3 /mcL and the differential showed circulating blasts. Further workup, including BM biopsy (5 years from the initial diagnosis of smoldering myeloma) was consistent with AML with monocytic features without evidence of residual PCN. Concurrent skin biopsy demonstrated infiltration by AML cells.
Serum immunofixation was notable for a faint IgG kappa band; the free kappa/lambda ratio was 28, and beta-2-microglobulin level was normal.
Given the patient's low-performance status (ECOG score-2) status and cytopenia, the patient was treated with a combination of hypomethylating agent (azacitidine) and venetoclax. After the first cycle of treatment, the bone marrow biopsy was hypocellular with residual AML by morphology (5–10 % blasts), had two metaphases with residual complex karyotype, and initial resolution of skin involvement. The patient received a second cycle of azacitidine and venetoclax and a subsequent bone marrow biopsy revealed persistent AML (50 % blasts). Eventually, the patient was transitioned to supportive care/hospice.
The malignant plasma cells in initial and follow up marrow samples were of IgG/kappa secretory type and exhibited the following immunophenotype: CD19-, CD27-, CD38+, CD56+, CD81+, CD117+, CD138+, and kappa+, and harbored a normal karyotype. - Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) performed on CD138-enriched BM samples identified genetic abnormalities including t(4;14) ( FGFR3::IGH ) and deletion 13q. BRAF gene mutation was detected by next generation sequencing (NGS) molecular test. Of note, del(13q) was detected only in the first BM seen at our institute but not thereafter, and deletion TP53 and t(14;16) were not detected (see supplementary figure-1 for a detailed timeline). The leukemic cells of AML exhibited prominent monocytoid cytomorphology including large cell size, irregular nuclei with prominent nucleoli, abundant cytoplasmic vacuoles ( Fig. 1 a-b), expressed CD11b,CD11c, CD13 (partial),CD56,CD64, and HLA-DR(partial), and were negative for CD34,CD117, and CD33 by 10-color multiparameter flow cytometry assay performed on the BM sample at presentation. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on BM core biopsy ( Fig. 1 c-d)and abdominal skin biopsy the same leukemic cells harboring identical disease and showed the following staining pattern: CD30-,CD43+,CD56+,CD68+,CD138-,CD163-, cytokeratin AE1-3 (-), IgG-, lysozyme+, MUM1-, myeloperoxidase (MPO)+, OCT2+ (partial), PAX5-, and TdT-. The karyotypic analysis of the AML BM sample showed an abnormal complex karyotype that was significant for t(4;14)(p13;q32) ( Fig. 2 ) and multiple numerical and structural changes (table 1). NGS assay, 75 myeloid neoplasm-related genes, performed on the BM showed BRAF c.1397G>C (p.G466A) detected in ∼14% of alleles and KRAS c.35G>T (p.G12V) in ∼27% of alleles.


Discussion
Trans-differentiation or lineage switch of hematologic neoplasms is an uncommon phenomenon and rarely reported in the context of PCN/PCM. The myeloid neoplasms, and seldomly B lymphoblastic leukemia, that are encountered in the context of post-therapy, including post-auto-PBSCT, for PCN represent therapy-related/clonally unrelated hematolymphoid neoplasm [ 6 ]. The combination of chemotherapy that includes melphalan, utilized within the auto-HSCT therapy, is a key risk factor for t-MN. Commonly, Therapy-related MNs are often associated with a complex karyotype and TP53 mutation [ 3 ]. Studies have suggested that t-MN evolves from a pre-existing hematopoietic clone harboring a leukemic driver single nucleotide variant (SNV) that escapes high-dose melphalan conditioning prior to auto-HSCT [ 2 ]. Whether t-MN derived from a pre-existing hematopoietic clone prior to chemotherapy or an acquired hematopoietic clone after treatment, clonality relatedness between t-MN and PCN is not typical.
The patient had a long-standing history of high-risk PCM with t(4;14) FGFR3::IGH fusion and mutations affecting the mitogen-activated-protein-kinase (MAPK) pathways including BRAF and KRAS . The disease was treated with standard therapeutic modalities including auto-HSCT 5 years before the presentation of AML with dominant monocytic features and similar genetic abnormalities. Interestingly, t(4;14) was identified in the initial PCN cells as well as the subsequent AML blasts supporting a clonal relatedness and emergence from the same hematopoietic stem cell clone in a process known as trans-differentiation. We do not know the exact BRAF mutation variant at the time of PCN diagnosis, but given the presence of t(4;14), it could be inferred the possibility of the same BRAF mutation existed in both. Studies have shown that clonal stem cells with BRAF mutation can evolve into multiple de-novo BRAF mutated neoplasms with different lineages that manifest either simultaneously or at different time points [ 7 ].
Lineage-plasticity between B-lineage cells and myelomonocytic/histiocytic cells with BRAF mutation was demonstrated in prior studies [ 7 ]. The environmental milieu and the upregulation and downregulation of lineage-specific genes would determine the lineage switch. For example, the downregulation of B-cell transcription factors including PAX5, E2A, and EBF, and the upregulation of PU.1 leads to myelomonocytic lineage commitment [ 7 , 8 ]. CD19 positive B220 − cells from adult mouse bone marrow can transform into macrophages when cultured in the presence of IL-3, IL-6, and GM-CSF [ 7 , 8 ]. There are several reported cases of secondary trans-differentiated histiocytic/monocytic disorders arising from B-cell lymphomas with genetic mutations enriched in the BRAF /MAPK pathway [ 5 ]. However, such trans-differentiation of PCN has been rarely reported. Gralewski et.al. reported a patient with PCN that transdifferentiated into a “myeloid sarcoma” (extramedullary involvement by myeloid neoplasm) with “tumor cells derived from monocyte-macrophage-lineage” [ 4 ]. Interestingly, the reported and current patients shared similar findings; both had PCN carrying high-risk cytogenetic profile and BRAF mutation, which may have role in this lineage switch. Both cases had evidence of extramedullary involvement, raising the possibility that the molecular aberrations leading to trans-differentiation also led to the infiltration of organs by leukemic cells. However, the pathways leading to myeloid sarcomas are currently not well understood. Of note, response to HMA and venetoclax was only transient, underscoring the aggressive features of the myeloid neoplasm.
In addition, BRAF mutation is uncommonly associated with AML [ 9 ], and the BRAF mutations observed in both patients (G466A and G469V) differ from the V600E typically found in hairy cell leukemia, histiocytosis, and melanoma. The clinicopathologic and genetic features of both patients are summarized in Table 1 .
Table 1
The clinicopathologic and genetic features of plasma cell neoplasm/myeloma (PCN/PCM) underwent trans-differentiation to myeloid sarcoma (MS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in two patients.
HSCT = Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. MPO = Myeloperoxidase. VAF = Variant allele frequency.
| Patient reported by Gralewski et al | Current patient | |
| Patient | 60 Y/O M | 74 Y/O F |
| PCN immunophenotype (IHC and MFC) | CD20+ (partial) CD38+ CD138+ MUM1+ lambda+ / CD19- CD27- CD45- CD56- CD81- | CD38+ CD56+ CD81+ CD117+ CD138+ kappa+ / CD19- CD27- CD45- |
| PCN karyotype | Anormal complex | Normal karyotype |
| PCN FISH | Not available | del(13q) (in 17 of 50 cells) and t(4;14) (in 30 of 50 cells) |
| PCN molecular genetic testing | IGH :: MAF gene rearrangement, BRAF G469V and G466A, KRAS A146V, MAP3K6 Q943, CDKN2A/B loss, TRAF3 R505, PTPRO E379K | BRAF (no further characterization available) |
| PCN therapy | Induction → cytoreduction → melphalan-based auto-HSCT | Induction → cytoreduction → Trametinib →RVd → auto-PBSCT conditioned with Melphalen → Ixazomib maintenance |
| Time to trans-differentiation post-auto-HSCT | 12 months | ∼ 51 months |
| Trans-differentiation diagnosis | MS (monocyte-macrophage derived) (essentially extramedullary involvement) | AML with monocytic features (medullary and extramedullary involvement) |
| Trans-differentiation immunophenotype (IHC and MFC) | CD11b+ (bright) CD14+ (bright) CD33+ CD36+ (variable) CD45+ CD68+ CD163+ HLA-DR+ MPO+ (subset) lysozyme+ / CD34- CD56- CD117- CD138- PAX5- P53- MUM1- S100- | CD11b+ CD11c+ CD13+ (partial) CD43+ CD45+ (dim) CD56+ CD64+ CD68+ HLA-DR+ lysozyme+ MPO+ OCT2+ (partial) / CD3- CD20- CD30- CD33- CD34- CD117- CD138- CD163- cytokeratin AE1/3- IgG- MUM1- PAX5- TdT- |
| Trans-differentiation karyotype | Normal (limited by low mitotic index) | Abnormal complex, including t(4;14)(p13;q32), in 10 cells, and normal in 1 cell |
| Trans-differentiation FISH | t(14;16)(q32;q23) [ IGH::MAF ] | t(4;14) [ IGH::FGFR3 ] (76% of cells) |
| Trans-differentiation molecular genetic testing | IGH :: MAF gene rearrangement, BRAF G469V KRAS A146V, MAP3K6 Q943, CDKN2A/B loss, NF1 R2450 | BRAF c.1397G>C (p.G466A) (VAF: 14%), KRAS c.35G>T (p.G12V) (VAF 27%) |
| Trans-differentiation therapy | induction chemotherapy (7 + 3 regimen of cytarabine and idarubicin) | Hypomethylating agent (HMA)-Azactidine and Venetoclax |
| Follow up | Persistent/refractory disease with soft tissue involvement and the patient died shortly after 2 months | Persistent/refractory disease with extramedullary involvement and last follow-up about 4–5 months after the AML presentation |
KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations are observed in a sizeable percentage of patients with PCNs and are associated with reduced time of response/probability of complete remission [ 10 ]. BRAF inhibitors have shown efficacy in some BRAF (V600E) mutated neoplasms such as hairy cell leukemia or melanoma. BRAF inhibitors are not standard of care in the treatment of PCN, but studies with RAS-RAF-MEK pathway inhibitors have been reported [ 10 ]. We acknowledge the limited records of diagnosis and early treatment of the PCN, lack of detailed molecular data, and details regarding trametinib (MEK-inhibitor) use.
Conclusion
Myeloid/monocytic trans-differentiation of PCN is rarely encountered. The recognition of overlapping features, including molecular and chromosomal aberrations, highlights the importance of elucidating lineage plasticity and molecular pathways that promote extramedullary tissue infiltration. Regardless, this phenomenon appears to be associated with dismal outcomes. Vigilance in studying this phenomenon could further provide prognostic information and inform the best therapeutic strategies.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Saja Asakrah: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Kristin K. Deeb: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Nikolaos Papadantonakis: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. George Deeb: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.lrr.2025.100504 .
Supplementary materials
References
1. Ragon B.K., et al. Impact of second primary malignancy post–autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis. Blood Adv. 2023;7(12):2746–2757. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009138. Jun.
2. Matarraz S., et al. Myelodysplasia-associated immunophenotypic alterations of bone marrow cells in myeloma: are they present at diagnosis or are they induced by lenalidomide? Haematologica. 2012;97(10):1608–1611. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.064121. Oct.
3. Maclachlan K., et al. Bailliere Tindall Ltd; 2020. Second Malignancies in Multiple Myeloma; Emerging Patterns and Future Directions. Mar. 01.
4. Gralewski J.H., Post G.R., van Rhee F., Yuan Y. Myeloid transformation of plasma cell myeloma: molecular evidence of clonal evolution revealed by next generation sequencing. Diagn. Pathol. 2018;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s13000-018-0692-1. Feb.
5. Xiao W., et al. Oxford University Press; 2023. B-cell Lineage Neoplasms Transdifferentiating Into Histiocytic/Dendritic Cell Neoplasms: Diversity, Differentiation Lineage, Genomic Alterations, and Therapy: Report from the 2021 SH/eAHP Workshop. Jun. 01.
6. Kallen M.E., et al. Therapy-related B-lymphoblastic leukemia after multiple myeloma. Leuk. Res. Rep. 2022;18 doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2022.100358. Jan.
7. Egan C., Lack J., Skarshaug S., Pham T.A., Abdullaev Z., Xi L., Pack S., Pittaluga S., Jaffe E.S., Raffeld M. The mutational landscape of histiocytic sarcoma associated with lymphoid malignancy. Mod. Pathol. 2021;34(2):336–347. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00673-x. FebEpub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929178; PMCID: PMC9161669.
8. Xie H., Ye M., Feng R., Graf T. Stepwise reprogramming of B cells into macrophages. Cell. 2004;117(5):663–676. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00419-2. May 28PMID: 15163413.
9. Xu Y., Wertheim G., Morrissette J.J.D., Bagg A. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2017. BRAF Kinase Domain Mutations in de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Monocytic Differentiation. Mar. 04.
10. Guo C., Chénard-Poirier M., Roda D., de Miguel M., Harris S.J., Candilejo I.M., Sriskandarajah P., Xu W., Scaranti M., Constantinidou A., King J., Parmar M., Turner A.J., Carreira S., Riisnaes R., Finneran L., Hall E., Ishikawa Y., Nakai K., Tunariu N., Basu B., Kaiser M., Lopez J.S., Minchom A., de Bono J.S., Banerji U. Intermittent schedules of the oral RAF-MEK inhibitor CH5126766/VS-6766 in patients with RAS/RAF-mutant solid tumours and multiple myeloma: a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and basket dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(11):1478–1488. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30464-2. NovEpub 2020 Oct 28. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):e42. 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00014-0. PMID: 33128873.