Introduction
Global increases in healthcare expenditure have not been proportional across the world [ 1 ]. In sub-Saharan Africa, government spending on health is very low whilst out-of-pocket expenditure is significantly high. These countries do not have well-developed health insurance systems and their out-of-pocket health expenditure is sometimes higher than 70% of the respective national health expenditures [ 2 , 3 ]. Universal health insurance is still in its infancy in sub-Saharan Africa, with only four countries having at least 20% of their populations covered by the government-funded health insurance [ 3 , 4 ]. Therefore, the family (informal caregiver(s)) of a person with a chronic disease in this region is often faced with a double burden of the long-term nature of the disease and the limited availability of diagnostic and disease management services [ 5 ]. Chronic diseases which are projected to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Africa by 2030 are slow-progressing diseases that last long in the body and cannot be transmitted from one person to another [ 6 , 7 ].
The term informal caregiver is used to refer to any layperson who provides regular emotional, physical, financial, and medical support to the sick or to people with disabilities, often without expectation of an immediate reward [ 8 , 9 ]. Throughout this review, ‘informal caregiver’ and ‘caregiver’ are used interchangeably to mean the same thing unless otherwise specified. Many times, informal caregivers have a familial relationship with the care recipient, often assuming the caregiving role as parents, spouses, children, siblings, or other relatives. These caregivers are predominantly female and frequently take on the caregiving role with minimal or no preparation [ 10 ]. It is understood that the caregivers in sub-Saharan Africa perform numerous tasks, some of which are typically responsibilities of healthcare professionals in other parts of the world [ 10 , 11 ]. They perform these activities whenever required, whether day or night, at home or in the hospital and under any situation. For example, caregivers sometimes sleep on hospital floors during the night to provide companionship and maintain close proximity to the care recipient in order to address any immediate concerns required by either the patient or the medical personnel at the hospital [ 12 ]. Accordingly, they are faced with unique challenges, such as overwhelming responsibilities, high out-of-pocket health expenditure, stigma, and limited access to healthcare services [ 10 , 11 ].
Over the years, reviews have been conducted to assess the impact of caregiving in sub-Saharan Africa. The focus of these reviews has been on specific conditions such as HIV [ 13 ], cancers [ 10 ], old age, end-of-life care [ 14 ], mental health disorders [ 15 ] and stroke. Other researchers limited their reviews to studies within specific countries [ 16 ] or specific settings like hospitals [ 17 ].
In this review, we aimed to systematically summarise evidence on the health and economic impact of caregiving on caregivers of patients with chronic diseases in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa. This was achieved through the following three objectives: 1) To identify the activities caregivers of people with chronic diseases in sub-Saharan Africa perform 2) To synthesize the reasons why caregivers of people with chronic diseases in sub-Saharan Africa took on the caregiving roles 3) To summarise evidence on the health and economic impact of caregiving on caregivers of people with chronic diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. From our understanding, this is the first review to explore how caregiving affects the health and economic aspects of caregivers of people with major chronic diseases in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted, adhering to the guidelines laid out in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [ 18 ]. The protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number of CRD42022358531. The databases were searched between September and October 2022, and updated in May 2024.
Eligibility criteria
The criteria for selecting studies were as follows:
Study design
All original studies, irrespective of the design were included in this review. These included randomised controlled trials, case-control, cohort, cross-sectional and qualitative studies. However, commentaries and reviews were excluded.
Population
Studies with informal caregivers providing care to people with chronic diseases were included. We included the major chronic diseases which are known to cause significant morbidity and over 80% of premature deaths ‐ these were cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, cancers and Type 2 diabetes [ 19 ]. We excluded mental health conditions because there is already a systematic review on the impact of providing informal care to people with mental health conditions in sub-Saharan Africa [ 15 ]. We also excluded informal caregivers of people with a co-morbidity that is not a major chronic disease. We did not include studies that had less than half (50%) of informal caregivers in active caregiving roles. Caregivers may not actively provide care when the care recipient has significantly improved, died and when another person has taken over the caring role. We also excluded studies where results for the population of interest were pooled with others (such as professional caregivers, paid caregivers, and volunteers) and if the proportion of the population of interest was under 50%. Such studies would dilute the relevance of the findings and make them less applicable to informal caregivers, who are this review’s population of interest. Where results were presented separately for the population of interest, we included the studies regardless of what proportion of the total sample they made up.
Outcomes
The studies that were selected for inclusion in this review had findings with information about how caregiving affected the health or economic aspects of the informal caregiver’s life. Such information had to be provided in the findings.
Setting
Studies were selected if they were conducted within sub-Saharan Africa as defined by World Bank ( https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/pages/focus-sub-saharan-africa ). The search was not restricted to any language since articles published in languages other than English were translated.
Information sources
EK searched for relevant original articles from the following databases between September and October 2022, and updated in May 2024: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Global Health and Web of Science. The searches were conducted from the inception of each database up to the date of each search. Full details of the searches including the databases, search strategy and the search outcomes can be found in S1 File .
In addition, the reference lists of selected articles and relevant systematic review reports were searched. Lastly, primary authors of editorial letters, abstracts from conference proceedings, abstracts without full-text articles and commentaries identified through the searches were contacted by email for full-text original articles.
Search strategy
The search strategy development process involved identifying candidate search terms by reading the titles, abstracts, keywords, and search strategies in the three known related articles [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]. A draft search string was formed by appropriately combining the identified search terms and MeSH terms using Boolean operators. The search terms: Informal caregiver, sub-Saharan Africa, and Chronic Diseases, were combined using the Boolean operator “AND,” while the thesauruses and MeSH words for each search term were combined using “OR.” This was improved after a review and discussion with two senior researchers (BB and MH) and a librarian from King’s College London, all of whom have experience in systematic reviews. This was done to enhance suitability of search terms and to ensure the search strategy would find all the relevant literature. The final search string as used in each database can be found in S1 File .
Selection process
The articles that were retrieved from all the searched databases were exported to Endnote (version 20) for removal of the duplicate articles. This was done by the first reviewer (EK). The remaining articles were then transferred to Rayyan software ( https://www.rayyan.ai/ ) where title and abstract screening was done. The articles that did not meet the agreed criteria were excluded while those that potentially met the eligibility criteria were included for full-text screening. Full-text screening was carried out for the articles whose full-text versions were retrieved. The articles whose full-texts were unavailable even after contacting the primary authors were excluded. At each stage, the screening was independently conducted by two reviewers. While EK screened all the articles in both stages, the second reviewer (ELM) screened a random 20% of the articles at the title and abstract screening stage, and a random 25% during the full-text screening. There was 96% agreement between the two reviewers and all disagreements were resolved by a discussion with input from other authors. In this review, all non-English papers were translated into English using Google Translate, a choice made due to its known reliability and accuracy in English with 91% agreement between native language reviewers and reviews who use google translate (range, 85% to 97%) [ 22 ]. EK confirmed that the selected articles were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Quality of the included studies
The quality of the articles was independently assessed by two reviewers (EK and ELM) using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, a critical appraisal tool that has been tested and found to be reliable and efficient [ 23 , 24 ]. It is used to assess the quality of studies of different designs including qualitative and quantitative studies. For each article (depending on the study design), there are five (5) questions that require a response of Yes, No or Can’t Tell. In this review, the Yes was given a score of 1 and No or Can’t Tell was given a score of 0. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus.
Data extraction and analysis
Relevant data was extracted from all articles by EK and entered into a data extraction form, developed with the study objectives in mind. The data that was extracted into the form included; the name of the first author of the study, the year of publication, the country where the study was conducted, study design, sample size, participants’ age and sex, their marital and employment status, the relationship of informal caregiver to the patient, caregiving activities, setting (home or hospital setting), type of chronic disease, scale used to measure impact, the health and economic impact of caregiving on informal caregivers and their motivation to provide care. Thereafter, data were synthesized narratively.
Results
Study selection
As shown in Fig 1 (PRISMA diagram), 4,951 records were retrieved through a systematic search of seven databases and a targeted search of the reference list of the already identified relevant articles (4). After removing 2,274 duplicate articles, 2,489 articles were excluded during the title and abstract screening and another 31 articles were also excluded because they were conference abstracts whose full-text articles could not be retrieved. During the full-text screening, 112 articles were excluded for various reasons including being conducted outside the sub-Saharan African region (n = 16), focusing on conditions other than chronic diseases (n = 8), having groups of participants with other diseases (n = 11), having participants that were paid or professional caregivers (n = 28), writing the article as a review or commentary (n = 10) and having outcomes that are not related to health or economic impact of caregiving (n = 39). The remaining 49 articles representing 47 studies were included in the review. This is because four articles, two from South Africa [ 25 , 26 ] and two from Ghana [ 27 , 28 ], were from one study in each of these countries.

Study characteristics
All studies were written in English except one that was in French [ 29 ]. The authors used qualitative methods in 22 of 47 studies. Twenty-four studies used quantitative methods while mixed-methods approach was used in one study. Of the quantitative studies, three [ 30 – 32 ] were longitudinal studies and the rest had a cross-sectional study design. The studies were from fourteen countries representing all the sub-regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Nigeria and South Africa had the highest number of studies in this review, with eleven [ 33 – 43 ] and ten [ 11 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 44 – 49 ] studies respectively, while each of the following countries had just one (1/47) study; Togo [ 50 ], Zimbabwe [ 51 ], Kenya [ 52 ], Sudan [ 53 ], Democratic Republic of Congo [ 54 ] and Cameroon [ 29 ]. The participants in the selected studies were drawn from various settings, including outpatient facilities [ 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 – 40 , 42 , 44 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 54 – 56 ], (n = 17) inpatient facilities [ 12 , 21 , 30 , 57 – 59 ] (n = 6) both outpatient and inpatient facilities [ 25 , 26 , 60 – 62 ] (n = 4), homes [ 32 , 46 ] (n = 2) and hospice centres [ 47 ] (n = 1). The setting was not specified in seventeen studies [ 9 , 11 , 27 , 28 , 35 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 48 , 50 , 53 , 63 – 69 ]. See Table 1 .
Table 1
Summary of the characteristics of the reviewed studies.
Note: All data was extracted by Ephraim Kisangala from January to March 2023 and in May 2024. ICGs—Informal caregivers.
| Author, year, Country | Study design (Setting) | Participants | Sample size | Disease | Relationship to Patient | Duration of caring | Time spent in care | Instrument used to assess impact | Heath and economic impact of caregiving |
| Yusuf (2011) [ 33 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Family caregivers Mean age: 57 years Age range: Not reported Sex: Female, 43 (42%) Employment: Unemployed 25 (24.3%) Employed 78 (75.7%) | 103 | Cancers (Not specified) | Spouse: 3 (2.9%) Son/daughter: 74 (71.9%) Sibling: 26 (25.2%) | Not reported | Not reported | General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30), Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) | • Mean ZBI score was 29.16; mean GHQ score was 3.67 • Psychological morbidity in 48 (46.6%) caregivers |
| Wassie (2022) [ 57 ] Ethiopia | Quantitative (Health facility inpatients) | ICGs of adults Mean age: 35 years Age range: Not reported Sex: Female, 176 (42.72%) Employment: Employed 282 (68.44%)/Unemployed 130 (31.56%) | 412 | Breast cancer 91 (22.09%); Cervical cancer 54(13.11%); Gastric cancer 30(7.28%); Others 237 (57.52%) | Spouse 140 (33.98%); Child 150 (36.41%); Siblings 85 (20.63%); Parents 21 (5.1%); Other relatives 16 (3.88%); | more than 2 weeks | Not reported | Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for Depression | Prevalence of depression was 45.15% (95% CI: 40.38–50.001) |
| Walubita (2018) [ 12 ] Zambia | Qualitative (Health facility inpatients) | ICGs of children with cancers Mean age: Not reported Age range: 20 to 58 years Sex: Female, 14 (93.3%) Employment: Not reported | 15 | Cancer of the kidney (4), Leukaemia (3), Retinoblastoma (3), Lymphoma (2), Cancer of the liver (1), Cancer of the lungs (1) | Parent 12; Grandparent 2; Great grandparent 1; | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Loss of jobs/source of income. • Reduced economic productivity |
| Vincent-Onabajo (2018) [ 34 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | ICGs of people with stroke Mean age: 33.2 years Age range: 19 to 60 years Sex: Female, 55 (61.1%) Employment: Unemployed 60 (66.7%)/Employed 30 (33.3%) | 90 | Stroke | Offspring 53 (58.9%); Spouse 22 (24.4%); Sibling 15 (16.7%). | Not reported | Not reported | Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) | • 74 (82.2%) caregivers experienced musculoskeletal symptoms (mms) in last 7 days. These symptoms were distributed as follows, 72% had Lower back symptoms, 40% upper back, 24.4% shoulder, 3.3% wrist. • Other mms symptoms reported were on the neck, hips, buttocks, thighs, knees, ankle and feet and elbow joint. |
| Thomas (2008) [ 44 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Health facility outpatients) | Primary ICGs Mean age: 47.2 years Age range:16 to 67 years Sex: Female 4 (66.7) Employment: Not reported | 6 | Stroke | Husbands 2 (33.3); Wife 2 (33.3%); Daughters 2 (33.3%) | Not reported | Always with the care recipient | None | • Resigned from work • Financial strain • Missed education (attending school) • Frequent infection due to low immunity coming from stressDepression |
| Tchokote (2020) [ 29 ] Cameroon | Qualitative (Health facility outpatients) | Primary or secondary ICGs Mean age: 32.75 years Age range: 20 to 50 years Sex: Female 2 (50%) Employment: Employed 1 (25%); Unemployed 3 (75%) | 4 | Stroke | Grandchildren 2 (50%); Wife 1 (25%); Daughter 1 (25%) | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Support with transport costs • Emotional reaction to diagnosis • Psychological exhaustion from heavy work • Depression • Less sleep • Less time for work • Less time for school |
| Serfontein (2019) [ 30 ] South Africa | Quantitative (Rehabilitation centre inpatients) | Primary ICGs Mean age: Not reported Age range: 23 to 76 years Sex: Female 50 (79.4%) Employment: Employed 30 (47.6%); Unemployed 33 (52.4%) | 63 | Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) | Spouses 32 (50.8%); Children 18 (28.6%); Other relatives (13 20.6%) | ≥ 2 months | 13.2% (5) spend ≥4 hours/day 55.6% (35) spend 2–4 hours/day & 23.8% (15) spent 5–6 hours/day | Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), & Interpretation guide of the CSI | • ICGs (28.6%) experienced work-related adjustments including changing to flexible working hours, taking night shifts and working from home. • ICGs were financially strain either regularly (n = 23; 36.5%) or at times (n = 17; 27%). |
| Scheffler (2019) [ 31 ] South Africa | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | ICGs [ 73/80 (91 . 2%)-ICGs; & 7/80 (8 . 8%) paid carers] Mean age: 47.4 years, Age range: 12 to 79 years Sex: Female 73 (82.0%) Employment: Not reported | 89 | Stroke | Spouse/partner 25 (28.4%) Son/daughter 33 (37.5%) Other family 19 (21.6%) Friend 6 (6.8%) Other 6 (5.7%) | Not reported | Not reported | Caregiver Strain Index | Financial strain at: • Baseline 30/84 (35.7%), & • Final assessment 25/66 (37.9%) |
| Owoo (2022) [ 28 ] Ghana | Qualitative (Not specified) | Family caregivers Mean age: 48.67 years Age range: 27 to 67 years Sex: Female 11 (91.67%) Employment: Employed: 9 (75%); Unemployed: 3 (25%) | 12 | Prostate cancer | Father 6 (50%) Husband 6 (50%) | 1 year 8 (66.67%) 2 years 3 (25%) 6 months 1 (8.33%) | Not reported | None | • Lack of adequate sleep and lack of sleep • Worsening of pre-existing conditions • Pain • Altered eating patterns and habits causing weight loss |
| Owoo (2022) [ 27 ] Ghana | Qualitative (Not specified) | Family caregivers Mean age: 48.67 years Age range: 27 to 67 years Sex: Female 11 (91.67%) Employment: Employed: 9 (75%); Unemployed: 3 (25%) | 12 | Prostate cancer | Father 6 (50%) Husband 6 (50%) | 1 year 8 (66.67%) 2 years 3 (25%) 6 months 1 (8.33%) | Not reported | None | Paid medical bills despite financial constraints |
| Onyeneho (2021) [ 35 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Not specified) | Primary caregiver Mean age: 37.68 YEARS Age range: 10 to >51 years Sex: Female 11 (91.67%) Employment: Employed: 9 (75%); Unemployed: 3 (25%) | 182 | Cancer (Not specified) | Brother 12 (6.6%) Sister 20 (11.0%) Parents 119 (65.4%) Husband 17 (9.3%) Wife 14 (7.7%) | <1 month 52 (28.6%) 1 month to 6 months 63 (34.6%) >6 months to 1 year 21 (11.5%) >1 year 46 (25.3%) Mean±SD 2.34±1.14 | Not reported | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) | • The mean score of the perceived financial effects of caregiving experienced by caregivers is 2.14, (> threshold of 2.00) • Causes of financial strain: • Lack of money (mean = 2.59 > 2.14), • Jobs affected (mean = 2.86 > 2.14), • Loss of money (spent) (mean = 2.21 > 2.14). |
| Okeke (2020) [ 36 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Informal caregivers Mean age: 41.1 years Age range: 18 to 75 years Sex: Female 179 (57.6%) Employment: Not reported | 311 | Stroke | Parents 100 (32.1%) Children 18 (5.8%) Spouse 106 (34.1%) Non relatives 18 (5.8%) Other relatives 69 (22.2%) | 1 to 3 months 112 (36%) 4 to 6 months 26 (8.3%) 7 to 12 months 22 (7.1%) 13 to 24 months 32 (10.3%) More than 24 months 119 (38.3%) | Not reported | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI); & Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | • ICGs were depressed (mild depression 93 (29.9%), moderate depression 48 (15.4%), moderately severe depression 28 (9.0%) & severe depression 16 (5.1%). • Association between burden of care and depression (χ2 = 99.3, p < 0.001);, • There was a positive correlation between the ZBI scores for the burden of care and the PHQ9 scores for depression in ICGs (r2 = 0.751; p<0.001), • There was a positive correlation between severity of depression and burden of care (r2 = 0.68, p < 0.001). |
| Ohaeri (1999) [ 37 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Informal caregivers Mean age: 35.6 Age range: 18 to 75 years Sex: Not reported Employment: Employed 52 (70.4%), Unemployed 21 (29.6%); | 73 | Cervix cancer Breast cancer | Husband 24 (32.9%) Child 36 (49.3%) Others: 13 (17.8%) | Not reported | Daily contact with patient 55 (75.3%) | Burden questionnaire | • Moderate/major loss of revenue by 31.6% ICGs • Expenditure on patient had major effect on 68.4% ICGs. • Major/moderate loans taken by 23.3% ICGs. |
| Ogunmodede (2019) [ 38 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Primary caregivers [1(1%) paid carers , 99 (99%) ICGs] Mean age: 46.5 years Age range: ≤20 to >60 years Sex: Female 56 (56.0%) Employment: Employed 66 (66.0%), Unemployed 34 (34.0%) | 100 | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Parents 10 (10.0%) Child 40 (40.0%) Spouse 34 (34.0%) Siblings 11 (11.0%) Unrelated 1 (1.0%) Others 4 (4.0%) | Not reported | Daily contact 83 (83.0%) Weekly contact 10 (10.0%) 2–3 times a month 5 (5.0%) Several times a year 2 (2.0%) Number of contact hours </ = 5hours: 4 (4.0%) 6–10 hours: 18 (18.0%) 11–15 ours 22 (22.0%) >16 hours 31 (31.0%) | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) | 35% of caregivers had GHQ ≥ 3 indicating psychological distress. |
| Muriuki (2023) [ 52 ], Kenya | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Family caregivers Mean age: Not reported Age range: 18 to >61 years Sex: Female 147 (57.6%) Employment: Employed 109 (42.8%), Unemployed 146 (57.3%) | 255 | Cancer (not specified) | Not reported | at least 2 weeks | Not reported | Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI) tool | Prevalence of ICG with: • Financial strain was100% • Disturbed sleep was 56.5%Work related adjustments was 72.2% |
| Muliira (2019) [ 60 ] Uganda | Quantitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Family caregivers Mean age: 36 years Age range: 18 to >51 years Sex: Female 208 (73.2%) Employment: Employed 161 (56.7%), Unemployed 123 (43.3%) | 284 | Breast cancer (18.3%), cervix cancer (12.3%), and leukaemia (12.3%) and others (cancers of oesophagus, prostate, ovary, pancreas, stomach, Lymphomas, and multiple myeloma). | Spouse 57 (20.1%) Child 110 (38.7%) Others 117 (41.2%) | 7–11 months 135 (47.5%) 12–24 months 91 (32.1%) ≥25 months 58 (20.4%) | ≤48 hours/week 57 (20.1%) 49–120 hours/week 92 (32.4%) ≥121 hours/week 135 (47.5%) | Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale | • The ICGs experienced (prevalence): • Clinically significant symptoms of anxiety (35.2%) • Severe symptoms of anxiety (20%) • Clinically significant symptoms of depression (48.2%) • Severe symptoms of depression (27.5%) |
| Mthembu (2016) [ 45 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Not specified) | Informal caregivers Mean age: 58.5 years Age range: 24 to 79 years Sex: Female 5 (83.33%) Employment: Not reported | 6 | Lung Disease Hypertension Stroke Diabetes mellitus | Spouse 2 (33.33%) Children 3 (50%) Other relatives (Daughter in Law) 1 (16.67%) | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Work-related challenges eg loss of jobs, struggle to balance jobs, education and care’ • Struggled to raise money for medicationGained emotional strength from caring. |
| Mlaba (2021) [ 26 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Informal caregivers ( patients of 3 (15%) of IGCs had died ) Mean age: 55.05 years Age range: 21 to 84 years Sex: Female 14 (70.0%) Employment: Not reported | 20 | Various cancers (Not specified) | Spouse 7 (35.0%) Offspring/children 5 (25.0%) Parent 1 (5.0%) Other relatives 7 (35.0%) | Not reported | Not reported | • Psychological distress. • Disrupted sleep patterns | |
| Mlaba (2020) [ 25 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Informal caregivers ( patients of 3 (15%) of IGCs had died ) Mean age: 55.05 years Age range: 21 to 84 years Sex: Female 14 (70.0%) Employment: Not reported | 20 | Various cancers (Not specified) | Spouse 7 (35.0%) Children 5 (25.0%) Parent 1 (5.0%) Other relatives 7 (35.0%) | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Jobs affected through less work time, losing jobs, changing jobs to one closer to patient. • High medical and food expenses. • Loss of income due to affected jobs and high medical expenses. • They became less financially stable than before. |
| Mensah (2021) [ 63 ] Ghana | Qualitative (Not specified) | Husbands of women with advanced breast cancer Mean age: Not reported Age range: 34 to 55 years Sex: Female 0 (0%) Male 15 (100%) Employment: Employed 15 (100%) | 15 | Breast cancer | Husband 15 (100%) | 4 to 11 months | Not reported | None | • Employment challenges (failure to balance work and care, inability to meet job expectations, lateness to work, and absenteeism). They were questioned, warned or dismissed from work or their businesses failed. • Loss of income and social networks • Experienced debt and financial constraints • Sold off valuable family property to meet medical expenses/requirements • Developed psychological problems eg identity crisis |
| Mekonnen (2020) [ 64 ] Ethiopia | Mixed (Not specified) | Parents of children with cancer Quantitative Mean age: Not reported Age range: 18 to >49 years Sex: Female 145 (52.7%) Employment: Not reported Qualitative Mean age: Not reported Age range: 36–45 years Sex: Female 13 (65%) Employment: Not reported | 295 (Quantitative = 275; Qualitative = 20) | Cancer (Not specified) | Quantitative Parents 275 (100%); and Qualitative Parents 20 (100%) | Qualitative (n = 275) 1–3 weeks 14 (5.1%) 4–6 weeks 148 (53.8%) 7–9 weeks 64 (23.3%) ≥10 weeks 49 (17.8%) | Not reported | Likert-type scale questionnaire adopted from Beck’s depression inventory scale | • Financial problems • They made less and spend more money • ICGs worried about the high treatment costs. • They’re psychologically traumatised.Prevalence of depression among the ICGs of children with cancer was 49.1% (mild mood disturbance), 7.3% (borderline clinical depression, 6.2% (moderate depression), 6.5% (severe depression) and 3.3% (extreme depression). |
| Masuku, (2018) [ 46 ] South Africa | Qualitative (At their home) | Primary caregivers Mean age: 38 years. Age range: 21 to 65 years Sex: Female 14 (100%) Employment: Employed 6 (42.9%), Unemployed 8 (57.1%) | 14 | stroke | Children 5 (35.7%) Other relatives 1 (7.1%) Wife 6 (42.9%) Sister 2 (14.3%) | RANGE (3 months to more than 3 years) </ = 6 months 6 (42.9%) 7 months to </ = 12 months 3 (21.4%) >12 months to </ = 24 years 3 (21.4%) 24 months to 48 months 2 (14.3%) | Not reported | None | ICGs experienced: • Lifestyle adjustments to accommodate the extra burden caused by care. • Missed treatment & reviews due to lack of money and poverty. • Emotional and psychological challenges • Poor health especially the older caregivers • Change of jobs to work near home. |
| Masika (2020) [ 58 ] Tanzania | Qualitative (Health facility inpatients) | Guardians of children Mean age: 38 years Age range: Not reported Sex: Female 15 (68.2%) Employment: Not reported | 22 | leukemia (5), eye cancer (5), cancer of the glands (5), kidney cancer (2), stomach cancer (1), thyroid cancer (1), and liver cancer (1) | Guardian 22 (100%) | Not reported | Not reported | • They were financial concerns due to prioritisation of care demands and costs over their economic activities, • Separation from their families during care. • Sold off family property to meet medical bills • Experienced emotional stress • Lack of support from family, health workers or community. • Expressed need to generate an income while in hospital | |
| Marima (2019) [ 51 ] Zimbabwe | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | ICGs Mean age: 41.5 years Age range: Not reported Sex: Female 50 (70.4%) Employment: Not reported | 71 | Stroke | Not reported | Median (IQR) 4 (2–13) months; Most had provided care for at least 4 months | Not reported | Shona Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ); Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) | 45.1% of the caregivers showed excessive psychiatric morbidity. The median SSQ score was 7 (IQR: 3–9) |
| Maree (2018) [ 11 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Not specified) | Primary ICGs Mean age: 41.7 years Age range: 20 to 65 years Sex: Female 10 (50%) Employment: Not reported | 20 | various cancers (Not specified) | Children: 10 (50%) Spouse: 4 (20%) Friends: 3 (15%) Other relatives: 2 (10%) Sibling: 1 (5%) | Between 3 weeks and 10 years, with an average of 24.8 months (SD ± 26.9). | Not reported | ICGs work was affected through. • Loss of jobs • No time to search/apply for jobs • Absenteeism at work • Financial hardship worsened by the transport costs • Increased responsibilities. | |
| Kitoko (2022) [ 54 ] Democratic Republic of Congo | Quantitative (Rehabilitation centre Outpatients) | ICGs Mean age: 42.3 years Age range: Not reported Sex: Female 58 (68.2%) Employment: Employed: 54 (63.5%); Unemployed: 31 (36.5%) | 85 | Stroke | Not reported | At least 3 months | Not reported | Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI); The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); The modified Rankin scale (mRS). | • Anxiety • Yes: (HADSA >7) 28 (32.9%) • No: (HADSA ≤ 7) 57 (67.1%) • Mean Score: 5.85 ± 3.86 • Depression • Yes: (HADS D>7) 30 (35.3%) • No: (HADS D≤ 7) 55 (64.7%) • Mean Score: 6.15 ± 4.39 • Mixed type (Anxiety and Depression) • Yes: (HADS >14 28 (32.9%) • No: (HADS ≤ 14) 57 (67.1%) • Mean Score: 11.88 ± 7.12 • Using ZBI scores: 84.7% of the caregivers had (perceived) a high burden of depression |
| Khondowe (2007) [ 55 ] Zambia | Qualitative (Health facility outpatients) | Caregivers of stroke outpatients | 10 | Stroke | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | • Balancing work and care was difficult. • Money was inadequate for patient care and family. • Money was used to transport patients and getting extra support during care. | |
| Ketlogetswe (2022) [ 47 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Hospice inpatients) | Primary ICGs Mean age: 52 years Age range: 23 to 84 years Sex: Female 19 (86.36%) Employment: Employed: 10 (45.45%); Unemployed: 12 (54.54%) | 22 | cancers of head, neck, prostate, thyroid, breast, lung, vulva, & blood | mostly mothers of patient, others included partners, sons, daughters and a neighbour (No statistic given) | 13 months on average | Not reported | • ICGs were fearful, anxious and emotionally distressed etc about possible death of patient • Care was exhausting and demanding causing fatigue and sleep deprivation • They got health challenges, like pain, headaches, backache, fatigue and hypertension • Caregiving was financially draining eg buying prescribed medicines • Caregivers lost their jobs. | |
| Katende (2017) [ 61 ] Uganda | Quantitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Family caregivers Mean age: 33 years Age range: 18 to 60 years Sex: Female 80 (67.2%) Employment: Employed: 73 (61.3%) Unemployed: 46 (38.7%) | 119 | Cancer (Not specified) | Parent: 32 (26.9%) Other 1st degree relatives: 49 (41.2%) Extended family: 32 (26.9%) Other: 6 (5.0%) | Not reported | Not reported | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | • 45% participants had abnormal levels of anxiety (ALA). Male carers were most affected, and had higher levels of anxiety than their female carers (46.2% v.43.8%). • 26% caregivers had abnormal levels of depression (ALD). Males more affected than females and had higher levels of depression (30.8% v. 21.3%) |
| Jones (2012) [ 32 ] Tanzania | Quantitative (At their home) | Primary ICGs of physically dependant stroke survivor Mean age: 47 years Age range: 16 to 73 years Sex: Female 23 (85.19%) Employment: Employed: 17 (63.00%), Unemployed: 10 (37.00%) | 27 | Stroke | Children: 14 (51.85%) Spouse:11 (40.74%) Grand children: 2 (7.41%) | At least 6 months | Not reported | Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD) | • 22.2% of caregivers experienced anxiety (14.8% had mild, 3.7% had moderate and 3.7% had severe anxiety). • 40.7% caregivers had depression (29.6% had mild, 7.4% had moderate and 3.7% had severe depression) |
| Gertrude (2019) [ 21 ] Uganda | Qualitative (Health facility inpatients) | ICGs Mean age: Not reported Age range: 18 to ≥55 years Sex: Female 14 (56%) Employment: Employed: 21 (84%%), Unemployed: 4 (16%) | 25 | STROKE: Ischaemic stroke: 15 (60%) Haemorrhagic stroke: 8 (32%) Stroke (type Missing): 2 (8%) | Spouse: 9 (36%) Child/Child in law: 9 (36%) Other: 7 (28%) | 4 months to 1 year: 10 (40%) > = 1 year: 15 (60%) (Median duration of care:16 months) | Not reported | None | • High financial expenditure during care. • Difficulty balancing job, family and caregiving responsibilities. • Lost jobs in order to provide care, leading to financial strain. • Physical health complaints (body pain, swollen feet, and fatigue) • Psychological distress and grief following loss of the patient. |
| Gbiri (2015) [ 39 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Physiotherapy clinic outpatients) | ICGs assisting with ADL Mean age: 39.2 years Age range: 17 to 74 years Sex: Female 76 (48.4%) Employment: Employed: 105 (66.9%); Unemployed: 52 (33.1%) | 157 | Haemorrhagic stroke 61 (38.9%) Ischaemic stroke 96 (61.1%) | Children: 75 (47.8%) Spouse:45 (28.7%) Children: 21 (13.4%) Significant others: 16 (10.2%) | At least 1 month | Below 6 hours: 57 (36.3%) 6–12 hours: 82 (60.5%) > 12 hrs: 18 (11.4%) | None | • Caregiving puts a financial strain on the caregiver • Caregiving is associated with high expenses • ICGs felt unhealthy due to caring work |
| Gawulayo (2021) [ 48 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Not specified) | Family Caregiver assisting with ADL Mean age: 48 years Age range: 33 to 84 years Sex: Female 5 (62.5%) Employment: Employed: 2 (25%); Unemployed: 6 (75%) | 8 | Stroke | Tertiary: 1 (12.5%) Secondary: 7 (87.5%) | At least 6 months | Not reported | None | • Caregivers were unable to maintain financial stability. • Job challenges like resigning from jobs, becoming self-employed and changing jobs to flexible ones so they are available when needed. • They covered food and transport costs. • They experienced financial difficulties, exhaustion and burnout |
| Esmaili (2018) [ 65 ] Tanzania | Qualitative (Not specified) | Caregiver children with cancer Mean age: Not reported Age range: Not reported Sex: Female 11 (55%) Employment: Not reported | 20 | Hepatoblastoma (3), Kaposi’s sarcoma (3), Osteosarcoma (3), Wilms tumor (3), Chronic myelogenous leukemia (2), Nephroblastoma (2), Chondroid sarcoma (1), Neuroblastoma (1), Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1), Retinoblastoma (1) | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Caregivers took loans to care for their patient. • They defaulted home rent payments in order to cover patient’s bills. • They requested for early hospital discharge due to low finances, affecting prognosis of their patients |
| Duru (2021) [ 40 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | Parents of children with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) Mean age: Not reported Age range: Not reported Sex: Not reported Employment: Not reported | 121 | Acyanotic congenital heart diseases (79.3%), Cyanotic congenital heart (20.7%) | Mothers 84.3%; Guardians 10.7%; Fathers 5.0% | At least 3 months | Not reported | None | • Mean annual indirect costs by ICG was USD 53.42 ± USD 88.12 and ranged from USD 1.38 to USD 575.00. • Caregivers missed days at work and had reduction in income and productivity. • Mean direct cost of care was USD 240.00 ± 319.52, Range: USD 0.42 to 2123.78. • Total mean cost USD 244.31 ± 333.92, Range: USD 0.42 to USD 2,127.8 • Total spent by the 121 households on care in one year was USD 28,339.80. • 35.5% of the households suffered catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) due to healthcare expenses of the sick child. • Families had to cut down on basic needs like education, feeding, clothing and compromise living standards to cope with the long-term cost of healthcare. |
| Dhada (2019) [ 49 ] South Africa | Qualitative (Health facility outpatients) | ICGs of children Mean age: 38 years Age range: 20 to 67 years Sex: Female 14 (100%) Employment: Employed: 2 (14%); Unemployed: 12 (86%) | 14 | Diabetes Mellitus | Mother: 9 (64%) Aunt: 3 (22%) Grandmother: 2 (14%) | • The mean duration of each caregiver’s experience of caring for a child with DM was 3.4 (±2.6) years, with a range between 5 months and 10 years • Diabetes caregiving years (total): 47.4 | Not reported | None | • They experienced stress, fear and anxieties especially in the initial stages of care. • They could not continue with their jobs/work. • Purchased medical items at high costs. • Anxiety over where they will get the needed money. • Increased financial strain on the family. |
| Dawson (2020) [ 59 ] Ghana | Quantitative (Health facility inpatients) | Primary family caregivers Mean age: 40years Age range: <30 to >50 years Sex: Female 120 (76.9%) Employment: Employed: 130 (83.3%) Unemployed: 26 (16.7%) | 156 | Lymphoma | Auntie/Uncle: 13 (8.3%) Parent: 108 (69.2%) Grandparent: 19 (12.2%) Sibling: 16 (10.3%) | at least 1 month | Mean care hours/ month 52.3 About 56.8 and 54.0 hours per month are spent by carers in the private sector and self-employed (respectively) assisting patients with daily activities. Average time spent by those unemployed is 53.3 hours. | Cost-Of-Illness Analysis ZBI EUROHIS QoL | • Average caregiving cost per month of caregiving for lymphoma a patient was estimated at US$440.32 (SD: US$205.75) with 97% of the total cost constituting direct cost [US$427.05 (SD: US$203.92)]. • Caregivers raised 58% of the direct costs, and the rest came from contributions from relatives, gifts and donations and borrowing • Caregivers with high caregiver burden had lower quality of life (EUROHIS-QOL) |
| Bessa (2012) [ 50 ] Togo | Qualitative (Not specified) | ICGs Mean age: 43 years Age range: 30 to 65 years Sex: Female: 14 (82%) Employment: Employed: 7 (41%) Unemployed: 10 (59%) | 17 | Cancer (Not specified) | Siblings: 5 (29%) Spouse: 4 (24%) Children: 3 (18%) Parent: 2 (12%) Relatives: 2 (12%) Friends: 1 (6%) | 9 (53%) had been caring for a loved one between 4 and 12 months prior to the study | Not reported | None | • Caregivers spent about $66 monthly (range = $21 –$213) on the loved one with cancer. • They developed sicknesses like back pain • 47% participants found difficulty maintaining balance between paid work and caregiving. • Forced to leave paid work because there isn’t time causing financial challenges. • They found it difficult to concentrate at work and had reduced work efficiency. • Absenteeism at work. • Failure to pay medical bills led to debts and taking incomplete doses for the patients. for Unable to pay fully for their patient’s • They experienced emotional distress and psychological challenges • Loss of will to live and hope. • Caregivers’ children have had to drop out of school because she is not home to support children to go to school. |
| BeLue (2018) [ 56 ] Senegal | Qualitative (Health facility outpatients) | Family caregiver Mean age: 39.7 years Age range: 20 to 92 years Sex: Female: 10 (52.6%) Employment: Not reported | 19 | Diabetes mellitus | Children: 7 (36.8%) Spouse: 4 (21.1%) Sibling: 2 (10.5%) Others: 6 (31.6%) | Not reported | Not reported | None | • Stress and exhaustion from care work. • Difficult to maintain work and caregiving balance. • Caregivers adopted healthy lifestyles like healthy meals, regular exercises, regular medical checkups. • Improved their knowledge on diabetes and its management |
| Bekui (2023) [ 66 ] Ghana | Qualitative (Not specified) | Family caregiver of a child below 12 years Mean age: 39.7 years Age range: 30 to 69 years Sex: Female 3 (20%) Employment: Employed: 12 (80%) Unemployed: 3 (20%) | 15 | Childhood cancers (Not specified) | Not reported | at least 3 months | Not reported | None | • Economic • Depletion of the caregivers’ savings due to the cost while in the hospital. • Caregivers got loans and sold off personal property to raise money for treatment. • Some temporarily left work to make time for their sick children. • Loss of employment: Others gave up their businesses or employment in order to take care of their sick children. Health • Physical health challenges eg hypertension, backache, knee pains, headaches, sharp pains in the heart, fatigue • Psychological challenges resulting into loss of appetite, altered eating patterns and weight loss. • They missed their meals. • Sleep disruption in response to actual and anticipated care demand and child’s condition |
| Akpan-Idiok (2014) [ 41 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Not specified) | ICGs Mean age: 35.9 years Age range: <30 to 70 years Sex: Female 132 (62.9%) Employment: Employed 69 (32.9%) Unemployed: 141 (67.1%) | 210 | Cancer (Not specified) | Children: 132 (62.9%) Spouse/partner: 43 (20.5%) Sibling: 21 (10%) Friend: 14 (6.7%) | Not reported | Not reported | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) | 41.4% of the caregivers experienced financial burden |
| Adejoh (2021) [ 9 ] Nigeria, Uganda, & Zimbabwe | Qualitative (Not specified) | ICGs Mean age: 37 years Age range: 19 to 75 years Sex: Female 24 (50%) Employment: Not reported | 48 | Cancer (Not specified) | Sibling 18 (37.50%) Children: 15 (31.25%) Spouse: 11 (22.92%) Parent 5 (8.33%) | Not reported | Not reported | None | • They gave up jobs to provide care • Absenteeism at work to keep hospital appointment. • They had to reprioritize their resources as they put most resources in treatment of the patient at the expense of other vital things such as house rent. |
| Abba (2022) [ 42 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Health facility outpatients) | ICGs Mean age: 28.1 years Age range: 18 to 57 years Sex: Female 132 (60.6%) Employment: Unemployed 83 (38.1%) Employed 135 (61.9%) | 218 | Stroke | Not reported | 1–26 weeks: 204 (93.6%) 27–52 weeks: 12 (5.5%) 53–78 weeks: 1 (0.5%) 79–104 weeks: 1 (0.5%) | Full-time: 139 (63.8%) Part-time: 79 (36.2%) | None | • The overall prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among informal caregivers of stroke survivors in the past 12 months of caring was 16.5%. • They had pains in the neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist, upper back, low back, hips, knee, and ankle. |
| Yousif (2022) [ 53 ] Sudan | Quantitative (Not specified) | Parents of children with diabetes Mean age: Not reported Sex: Not reported Employment: Not reported | 150 | Diabetes Mellitus | Fathers and mothers (Proportion not given) | Not reported | Not reported | Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) | • Patterns of psychological problems of parents of children with diabetes • Depression level • Mild: 41 (27.3%) • Moderate: 34 (22.7%) • Severe: 4 (2.7%) • Extremely severe: 3 (2.0%) • Anxiety level • Mild: 37 (24.6%) • Moderate: 10 (6.7%) • Severe: 7 (6.5%) • Extremely severe: 10 (11.2%) • Stress level • Mild: 36 (24.0%) • Moderate: 22 (14.7%) • Severe: 12 (8.0%) • Extremely severe: 2 (1.3%) |
| Ogunyemi (2021) [ 43 ] Nigeria | Quantitative (Not specified) | Primary ICGs Mean age: Not reported Age range: ≤18 to 60 years Sex: Female 223 (57.9%) Employment: Employed: 231 (60%) Unemployed: 154 (40%) | 385 | Cancer (Not specified) | Parent: 133 (34.6%) Sibling: 93 (24.2%) Spouse: 61 (15.8%) Child: 32 (8.3%) Others: 66 (17.1%) | ≤ 6 months: 125 (43.4%) 7–12 months: 123 (42.7%) ≥ 13 months: 40 (13.9%) Median = 12 (±12.6) | 1–5 hours: 204 (53.0%) 6–11 hours: 132 (34.3%) ≥ 12 hours: 49 (12.7%) Median = 6 (±5.8) | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) | Financial burden: • 42.3% caregivers experienced moderate financial burden. • 47.3% caregivers experienced severe financial burden |
| Malangwa (2022) [ 62 ] Tanzania | Quantitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Caregivers with children confirmed with cancer. Mean age: Not reported Age range: 18–60 years Sex: Female 70 (72.9%) Employment: Employed: 44 (45.8%) Unemployed: 52 (54.2%) | 96 | Cancer (Not specified) | Parent: 79 (82.3%) Siblings: 8 (8.3%) Aunt/Uncle: 3 (3.1%) Grandparent: 6 (6.3%) | Not reported | Not reported | Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) tool. | The prevalence of psychological distress among caregivers of children receiving cancer treatment was 66.7% of the study population using HSCL-25. |
| Ababacar (2022) [ 67 ] Senegal | Quantitative (Not specified) | ICGs Mean age: 42.6 Age range: 22 to 75 years Sex: Female 32 (54.2%) Employment: Employed: 42 (70%) Unemployed: 18 (30%) | 60 | Stroke | Children (50%) Spouses (25%) Siblings (13.33%) Nephews/nieces (11.66%) | Not reported | Not reported | Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) | • Mean duration of work stoppage of caregiver was 23.86 days (SD 64.53 days) with extremes ranging from 0–365 days. • The average cost of financial losses related to the work stoppage of the main caregiver was 206.92 USD (SD 583.16 USD) with extremes of 0 and 3103.44 USD. • Among the employed caregivers, 47.61% changed jobs, 28.57% changed work schedule and 23.80% stopped working. • 45% caregivers experienced mild to moderate burden of care as assessed using ZARIT score. The mean ZARIT score was 2.65 (standard deviation 1.52) with extremes of 0 and 5.5. |
| Gosse (2024) [ 68 ] Tanzania | Qualitative (Outpatients and inpatients) | Male partners of women with cervical cancer Mean age: Not reported Age range: 41 to 80 years Sex: Male 13 (100%) Employment: Employed 11 (84.6%), Unemployed 2 (15.4%) | 13 | Cervical cancer | Male partner 13 (100%) | 1 year 4 (30.8%) 2 years 5 (38.4%) ≥ 3 years 4 (30.8%) | Not reported | None | The caregivers experienced: • Psychological distress and worries • Financial hardship due to increased financial demands and high costs. • Disruption of economic activities. • Selling of personal/family assets |
| Najjuka (2023) [ 69 ] Uganda | Qualitative (Not specified) | Family member of cancer patient Mean age: 32.5 years Age range: 19–49 years Sex: Female 6 (50%) Employment: Not reported | 12 | Various cancers (at stage 3 and 4) | Child: 7 (58.3%) Parent: 3 (25%) Spouse: 1 (8.3%) Niece/Nephew: 1 (8.3%) | 3–11 months: 2 (16.7%) 1–2 years: 8 (66.7%) > 2 years: 2 (16.7%) | None | • Financial drain • Physical health problems like headache, chest pain, fatigue and body pain • Sleep disturbances • Psychological challenges, including stress, fear, sadness and worry. • Absenteeism at work • Conflicts at work |
Quality of the included studies
Overall, the included studies were of good quality as shown in S1 Table . More than three-quarters (85%) of these studies met at least four of the five criteria. In two studies [ 37 , 67 ], only two of the five criteria were met. The weaknesses of the quantitative studies were predominantly related to the failure to report or justify the sampling strategy, sample size and risk of nonresponse bias. All the qualitative studies met at least four of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) criteria except one [ 29 ] where three of the five criteria were met.
Participants characteristics
There were 4185 participants in this review, majority of whom were either parents, siblings, children, spouses or other relatives of the patients and with an age range of ten [ 35 ] to ninety-two years [ 56 ]. The proportion of non-familial caregivers was less than 10% in each of the seven studies [ 31 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 47 , 50 , 61 ] where they were part of the sampled populations. In 19.1% (9/47) of the studies [ 12 , 40 , 49 , 53 , 58 , 62 , 64 – 66 ], the participants were caregivers of children with chronic diseases. More than half of the studies (53.1%, 25/47) focused on caregivers of people with cancers [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 25 – 28 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 41 , 43 , 47 , 50 , 57 – 66 , 70 ]. The participants in the remaining studies were caregivers of people with cardiovascular diseases [ 21 , 29 – 32 , 34 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 67 ] (36.2%, 17/47) and diabetes mellitus [ 38 , 49 , 53 , 56 ] (8.5%, 4/47). There was no study with caregivers of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Generally, there were more female participants than male participants. There were only male participants in one study [ 68 ] and the proportion of female participants did not reach half in just five (10.6%) of the included studies [ 33 , 39 , 57 , 63 , 66 ]. The characteristics of the included studies and participants are summarised in Table 1 .
Only two (4.3%) of the 47 studies had paid caregivers, with their number being a very small proportion of the respective study participants, that is 8.8% (7/80) in one study [ 31 ] and 1% (1/100) in another [ 38 ]. Similarly, three out of twenty participants in another study were not actively involved in care because their patients had died [ 25 , 26 ]. There was no study with a comparison group. Also, authors of ten studies [ 33 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 42 , 51 , 54 , 57 , 60 , 62 ] (41.7% of the quantitative studies) explained that they excluded caregivers who had any of the potential negative outcomes of caring being investigated in their respective studies prior to becoming a carer. For example, a study investigating the impact of caregiving on the mental health of caregivers excluded participants who had a diagnosis of a mental health disease prior to starting the provision of informal care.
Activities performed by the caregivers
The roles performed by caregivers were described in two-fifths (20/47) of the included studies. With the exception of one [ 47 ], these studies listed the various things caregivers did. In this particular study, the authors simply stated that performed activities of daily living were demanding and exhausting but did not specify what tasks they were.
In this review, we have grouped informal caregivers’ activities into three activities.
i. Basic activities of daily living
These are personal care tasks that are important for one’s everyday living. The caregivers played a critical role in supporting care recipients with personal care activities like bathing and dressing [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 28 , 29 , 39 , 44 , 45 , 50 , 55 , 63 , 69 ], toileting [ 21 , 50 ] and feeding [ 21 , 29 , 66 , 69 ]. They also assisted with functional mobility activities that support the patient to move in and out of bed, repositioning, ambulating and moving up/down the stairs [ 21 , 29 , 39 , 44 , 50 , 69 ].
ii. Instrumental activities of daily living
These activities were quite diverse and included caring for the patient’s children [ 44 ], shopping for the patient [ 11 , 55 ] and doing domestic tasks (house chores) like room cleaning, making meals, laundry and washing utensils [ 9 , 11 , 28 , 29 , 40 , 44 , 48 , 50 , 56 , 63 , 69 ]. The caregivers were actively involved in the health management of their sick loved ones by managing medical appointments and transporting the patient to hospital [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 40 , 48 , 49 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 66 , 69 ], communicating with health workers on the patient’s behalf [ 9 , 69 ], paying medical expenses [ 9 , 21 , 25 , 39 , 40 , 49 , 50 , 56 , 58 , 65 , 69 ], providing company and psychological support to patient [ 9 , 21 , 56 , 58 ] and monitoring the patient’s symptoms [ 11 , 49 , 63 ].
iii. Medical activities
The caregivers performed activities that would ideally require a certain level of medical training, experience or knowledge. Nine studies [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 29 , 44 , 45 , 56 , 63 , 69 ] highlighted specific medical procedures that were done by the caregivers. These included changing colostomy bags, wound dressing, helping patient use oxygen breathing apparatus and administering both oral and injectable medications for the patient. Despite performing these tasks, the caregivers acknowledged their lack of knowledge and skills. This was clearly articulated by one caregiver: “ To be honest I cannot say I have been doing a great job of caring for my father , …it is just a ‘trial and error’ situation . It feels like I am not doing enough . Somehow , I feel like giving up… ’[ 47 ].
Reasons/Motivation to provide care
The reasons for taking up caregiving roles were recorded in six (12.2%) studies [ 11 , 21 , 29 , 47 , 50 , 66 ], all of which were qualitative. From their submissions, it was clear that the decision to provide informal care depended on two things; how related or connected the caregiver was to the patient and the caregiver’s level of responsibility (social obligation) over the patient.
i. Relationship between the caregiver and the patient
Regarding the relationship (or connectedness) to the patient, caregivers narrated how they provided care because of the love that existed in their relationship either as family members, neighbours or friends [ 21 , 50 ]. Because of this bond (and feeling of belonging), they willingly volunteered and often considered themselves the most suitable persons to care for their loved ones. The closeness of the relationship between the caregiver and recipient is a strong motivator for becoming a caregiver. This view was echoed by a Togolese caregiver who was quoted saying, “ The problem is that nobody can take care of my mother as I am doing it . If something does not belong to you , you treat it differently .” Another participant in the same study added, “ I see myself in a better position to do the care work because I know her very well .” [ 50 ].
ii. Level of responsibility the caregiver has over the patient.
Quite relatedly, the caregivers also viewed their decision to care as a form of responsibility or a social obligation [ 11 , 29 , 47 , 50 , 66 ]. They naturally took on the role and were as committed in the work as they would in any other professional job. They considered caring as a duty they were obliged to perform against all odds for those they were socially expected to support. One mother explained how she had to take her older child (with cancer) to the hospital despite her own poor health: “ I remember there was a time I sat in a chair by the bedside throughout the night and my legs got swollen…it was not easy , but I passed through all that . When I gave birth on Thursday , the following Tuesday I had to bring my sick son to the hospital for review…I had to do it .” [ 66 ]
Impact of caregiving on the caregivers
All studies had an aspect of the impact (health or economic) caregiving had on the carers. In this section, results on how the impact was measured, positive impact of caregiving, economic impact of caregiving and health impact of caregiving was provided. These are also summarised in Table 2 .
Table 2
Summary of caregiver activities, motivations and the impact of caregiving on the caregivers.
| Results | Sub-heading | Studies |
| Activities done by caregivers (20 studies) | Basic activities of daily living | [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 28 , 29 , 39 , 44 , 45 , 50 , 55 , 63 , 66 , 69 ] |
| Instrumental activities of daily living | [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 25 , 27 – 29 , 39 , 40 , 44 , 45 , 48 – 50 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 69 ] | |
| Motivation to become a caregiver | Relationship between the caregiver and the patient | [ 21 , 50 ] |
| Level of responsibility the caregiver has over the patient | [ 11 , 29 , 47 , 50 , 66 ] | |
| Impact of caregiving | Positive impact of caregiving on caregivers | [ 45 , 56 , 69 ] |
| Economic impact of caregiving | 1. Direct cost of caregiving [ 40 , 50 , 59 , 67 ] 2. Social cost of caregiving [ 9 , 29 , 44 , 65 , 69 ] 3. Work-related effects of caregiving [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 21 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 44 – 50 , 52 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 ] 4. Financial challenges [ 11 , 25 , 30 , 31 , 35 , 37 , 39 – 41 , 43 , 44 , 47 – 49 , 52 , 55 , 58 , 59 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 69 ] | |
| Health impact of caregiving | 1. Impact on the physical health of the caregivers [ 21 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 34 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 47 , 50 , 52 , 66 , 69 ] 2. Impact on the mental health of the caregivers [ 21 , 26 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 38 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 – 51 , 53 , 54 , 56 – 58 , 60 – 62 , 64 , 67 – 69 ] |
Measurement of the impact of caregiving
From the findings, about half of the studies (22/47) used standardised tools/instruments to determine the impact of caregiving. It was only the qualitative studies and one quantitative study [ 40 ] where no standardised instrument was used in measuring the impact of caregiving. The tools (in their original or modified form) used include, the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) questionnaire [ 33 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 43 , 54 , 59 , 67 ], the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [ 32 , 54 , 60 , 61 ], Caregiver strain index (CSI) [ 30 , 31 , 39 , 52 ], Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) [ 34 , 42 ], General health questionnaire (GHQ) [ 33 , 37 , 38 ], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for Depression [ 57 ] Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale (CRA) [ 60 ], Beck’s depression inventory (BDI) scale [ 64 ], Shona Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ) [ 51 ], The modified Rankin scale (mRS) [ 54 ], Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) [ 53 ] EUROHIS QoL [ 59 ], Modified version of the Frankfurter Befindlichkeit Skala (FBS) [ 37 ] and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25) tool [ 62 ]. Two studies [ 40 , 59 ] used cost of illness approaches to estimate the direct and indirect costs incurred by the caregivers who supported people with chronic diseases.
Positive impact of caregiving
Although the focus of most studies was on the negative impact of caregiving, three [ 45 , 56 , 69 ] in particular had caregivers who described how rewarding the activity was to them. They commented on how the situation strengthened the bond with the person being cared for, thus enabling them to develop the dedication and emotional strength to continue caring. Furthermore, the practice of caring became a strong motivation for improvement of their own health [ 56 ]. Whenever they saw how their loved ones suffered, they felt energized to do whatever was necessary to avoid getting the same disease. They became motivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle that included having regular medical check-ups, doing more exercises and taking healthier meals.
Because of their involvement in the day-to-day management of the care recipients, they acquired skills and knowledge to protect themselves from acquiring the disease and to fulfil the care needs better. For example, one caregiver who was always there whenever the doctor came to treat his wife stated that, “ my experience helps a lot to avoid diabetes in my own life . What the doctor says to my wife , I also apply to my own life because that is good for everyone , not just the diabetic patients .” [ 56 ]
Economic impact of caregiving
There were three key findings under economic impact, and these were the cost of caregiving, the work-related consequences of caregiving and the subsequent financial challenges arising from caregiving.
Direct costs of caregiving
Surprisingly, only four studies [ 40 , 50 , 59 , 67 ] provided information on the monetary cost of caregiving on the caregiver. There was no uniformity on what constituted the caregiving cost or how it was reported. For example, the total direct costs were reported in two studies [ 40 , 59 ], total indirect costs in three studies [ 40 , 59 , 67 ] and financial loss caused by the main caregiver’s withdrawal from employment in two studies [ 40 , 67 ]. Furthermore, two studies presented their findings using average monthly costs [ 50 , 59 ] while the remaining two used average annual costs [ 40 , 67 ]. In one study, the total cost of caregiving [USD 66 (Range: 21–213) per month] was only stated, and no description or explanation on how the amount was estimated was provided [ 50 ]. While reporting the different costs, standard deviation was provided in three studies [ 40 , 59 , 67 ], range in two [ 40 , 50 ] and median in just one study [ 59 ]. The cost of caregiving varied significantly both within and across the studies. The study [ 40 ] with the highest average caregiving cost at USD 244.31 (SD: USD 333.92, Range: USD 0.42 ‐ USD 2127.8) per year was conducted among caregivers of children with congenital heart disease in Nigeria while the study among caregivers of children with lymphoma in Ghana had the lowest reported cost at USD 440.32 (SD: USD 265.75, Median: USD 409.60) per month [ 59 ]. The average annual productivity loss caused by the main caregiver’s employment cessation ranged from USD 53.42 (SD: USD 88.12, Range: USD 1.38 ‐ USD 575.00) [ 40 ] to 206.92 USD (SD: USD 583.16, Range: 0 to 3103.44 USD) [ 67 ]. The direct cost of caregiving made the biggest proportion of caregiving expenditure, accounting for nearly 97% of the total costs in one of the studies [ 59 ].
Social cost of caregiving
Of note, are the 5/47 studies [ 9 , 29 , 44 , 65 , 69 ] that commented on the social cost associated with informal caregiving. As one caregiver put it, caregiving “ restricts our lives ” [ 44 ] giving them little room for engagement in other activities. A female caregiver in Cameroon commented on the cost involved in letting go of her previously planned activities. She stated, “ Since my mother is in this state , […] I am obliged to suspend my participation in the church every morning as I did before because it is no longer possible ! I had to review all my activities because I had to find time for my mother! It’s painful but I do it! ” [ 29 ].
While some caregivers had to let go of their regular leisure activities [ 29 ], others especially the students ended up missing attending classes at school [ 44 , 69 ].
Work-related consequences of caregiving
In 22 (46.8%) studies, there is a clear demonstration of how caregiving affected all aspects of one’s work life (regular source of income). Since caring often required one’s physical presence, the caregivers not only used up all the available work leave (including taking leave without pay) but they were also frequently absent (without permission) from work. This resulted into being queried, warned, sanctioned and in other cases dismissed [ 9 , 11 , 50 , 63 , 66 , 69 ]. In the study by Ababacar et al. [ 67 ] the caregivers were off work for an average of 23.86 days (SD 64.53 days) per year with extremes ranging from 0 to 365 days.
The participants admitted that they struggled to maintain a balance between work and caregiving roles [ 9 , 11 , 21 , 45 , 50 , 55 , 56 , 63 , 69 ]. This made them less efficient (productive) at work and unable to meet several deadlines because they frequently arrived late for work, spent less time doing work and struggled to concentrate while at work [ 12 , 25 , 29 , 50 , 63 ]. This situation was well explained by the caregiver who said, “ There was a piece job that I had in Durban , it was affected because I had to be here in Pietermaritzburg to take care of her [my mother] . I couldn’t stay [at work] for the week and come back on the weekend or month end , I had to keep coming back here [to check on my mother] .” [ 25 ]
As such, they had to make work-related adjustments that would allow them to attend to their sick loved ones too. Part of the adjustments included getting a flexible work schedule that allowed them to work either at night or from home [ 30 , 46 , 52 , 67 ] and changing to temporary self-employment or to jobs that are flexible and closer to the patient’s home [ 25 , 48 , 67 ]. In cases where the caregivers could not maintain both work and caregiving roles, they either voluntarily resigned or were dismissed from work [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 21 , 25 , 44 , 45 , 47 – 50 , 58 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 ].
Financial challenges arising from caregiving.
There were 23 (48.9%) studies in which caregivers reported experiencing financial challenges. First, they stated that they lost money and their sources of income through covering high medical expenses and loss of jobs [ 25 , 35 , 37 , 40 , 47 , 65 , 66 , 68 , 69 ]. Their response to such challenges included taking loans to get money to care for the patient [ 37 , 59 , 63 , 65 , 66 ], seeking additional financial support from relatives and institutions like churches [ 58 , 59 ], sale of family properties [ 58 , 63 , 66 , 68 ] and requesting for premature discharge from the hospitals [ 65 ].
In cases where resources to cover the expenses were inadequate, the caregivers compromised their standard of living, forewent paying house rent, paying their children’s school fees as well as buying food and clothes in order to meet their patient’s care needs [ 9 , 65 ]. As a result, some were reportedly thrown out of their house due to non-paid rent.
Overall, caregivers felt that caring was financially burdensome causing them to be in a much less satisfactory financial status than before taking up the role [ 11 , 25 , 30 , 31 , 39 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 48 , 49 , 52 , 55 , 63 ]. They described their financial situation as being unstable, strenuous and hard, and they often became anxious whenever they thought about where to get more money to continue with their role [ 39 , 48 , 49 ]. Quantitatively, the prevalence of caregivers experiencing financial strain ranged from 37.9% to 100% [ 30 , 31 , 41 , 52 ].
Health Impact of caregiving
Caregiving affected the physical health and mental health of the carers as stated below.
i. Physical health consequences of caregiving
This was found in thirteen studies [ 21 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 34 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 47 , 50 , 52 , 66 , 69 ]. The development of new medical conditions and or worsening of existing health conditions among the caregivers affected their physical health and reduced their ability to adequately care [ 39 , 66 ]. Some attributed this to lowering of the body’s immunity [ 44 ] that occurred while providing care. They stated that they developed new medical conditions such as hypertension, headache, body pains and swelling of the feet during the period they provided care to the patient [ 21 , 47 , 66 , 69 ]. One caregiver even narrated a life-threatening incident that necessitated hospitalization “ …after collapsing while fetching water for the sick son ” [ 66 ]. There were also reports of the worsening of the caregivers’ own health condition [ 21 , 28 , 34 , 42 , 47 , 50 , 66 ]. The studies show how those with musculoskeletal complications such as pain in upper and lower back, pain in different joints (shoulder, wrist, hips, buttocks, knees, ankle and elbow joint), and pain in the thighs, neck and feet complained of deteriorating health. This was well articulated by a caregiver whose waist problem worsened while caring for her husband. She stated, “ Caring for my husband is not easy; I have a waist problem , and I find myself always very tired . The waist problem was there but was not as serious as it has become now , all because of the role I currently play ” [ 28 ].
The caregivers in eleven studies experienced significant lifestyle changes during their work. They felt that their sleep was disturbed because of actual/anticipated care demands, and severity of the condition of the person they cared for [ 66 ]. They experienced disruption from sleep, feeling of lack of enough sleep, feeling like they are deprived of sleep as well as short episodes of sleep [ 26 , 28 , 29 , 47 , 52 , 66 , 69 ]. Another way caregiving affected their lifestyle was through change in eating habits. This involved either changing the meal time in order to incorporate the caregiving demands/activities, eating the patient’s left over foods or missing the meals due to the lack of money/ time [ 28 , 66 ]. A male carer commented on his changed lifestyle by saying, “ It [life] has changed because I hardly sleep now , I just think that I can’t sleep I have to constantly check on him .” [ 26 ]
ii. Mental health consequences of caregiving
The act of caregiving had a profound effect on the mental wellbeing of care providers as stated in half (25) of the studies [ 21 , 26 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 38 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 – 51 , 53 , 54 , 56 – 58 , 60 – 62 , 64 , 67 – 69 ]. Although most of these studies described the different types of mental health challenges, five [ 33 , 38 , 51 , 62 , 67 ] did not specify as they only used the terms “psychological” and “psychiatric” challenges. Using GHQ [ 33 , 38 ], SSQ [ 51 ], HSCL-25 [ 62 ] and ZBI [ 33 , 38 , 67 ] tools, the reported prevalence of psychological/psychiatric challenges among caregivers ranged from 35% to 66.7%.
The caregivers experienced mild to severe forms of depression as was assessed using HADS [ 32 , 54 , 60 , 61 ], ZBI [ 36 ], PHQ-9 [ 57 ], BDI [ 64 ] and DASS-21 [ 53 ] tools. From these eight quantitative studies, the prevalence of depression ranged from 26% to 72.4%. In addition, there were two qualitative studies with caregivers who reported feeling depressed because of the caregiving work [ 29 , 44 ]. Some got to an extent of being treated for depression as explained by this South African caregiver: “ … I also get sick often . I have continuous lung infections from stress . I’m on antidepressants as well .”
Fear, stress and anxiety is another mental health related challenge that caregivers in eleven studies [ 32 , 47 , 49 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 68 , 69 ] reportedly experienced. There was no quantitative paper in which fear or stress was investigated. Instead, five quantitative papers employing HADS [ 32 , 54 , 60 , 61 ] and DASS-21 [ 53 ] tools found that the prevalence of anxiety among caregivers ranged from 21.6% to 45%. Sometimes, the caregivers thought about the likelihood of acquiring the same illness their loved ones have or death of those they care-for. Such thoughts caused fear, stress and anxiety among the caregivers [ 47 , 56 ]. This challenge was most felt in the initial stages of caring for the patient, when there was a lot of work to be done and when the activities were complex [ 49 ]. While one caregiver hinted at how hard some caregiving activities can sometimes be by saying, “the hardship is just injecting the child part , it’s not something that’s easy—it’s not easy–because sometimes you find that the child does not want to be injected…when her sugars are high and you try to inject her–she says ‘you’re injecting me a lot’ . ” [ 49 ]
Another expressed the fear that comes with such activities: “… The family members you stay with do want to assist with injecting the child but they are scared–so sometimes you’re the only one who’s taking care of the child . ” [ 49 ]
Five quantitative studies [ 32 , 53 , 54 , 60 , 61 ] explored the prevalence of anxiety among caregivers and found it to be in the range of 21.6% to 45%.
Caregiving was also described as an emotionally challenging activity by participants in five studies [ 29 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 68 ]. They used phrases such as being morally sick, emotionally painful, heartbreaking, emotionally touched, burdens me, disturbed and hopelessness to show their reaction to caring for the sick or the diagnosis given. The extent of suffering that caregivers observed their loved ones go through was enough to create feelings of preferring to “ isolate [oneself] to cry” and develop thoughts of “ not … living anymore ” [ 46 , 50 ]. Caregivers confessed that such reactions also followed the sudden announcement (by the medical team) of the type disease their loved one was suffering from [ 29 , 68 ]. One participant whose husband had been diagnosed with cancer recalled such a moment: “ It was painful , wena [‘you’–exclamation] . You … you know that person is a breadwinner and everyone in his family is looking up to him . He is supporting everyone . Then it was painful , but I think that I am recovering now .” [ 46 ]
Discussion
In this review, we found a total of 4185 participants who participated in 47 qualitative and quantitative studies from across the sub-Saharan African region. These studies were published over a period of more than two decades. This review provides a summary of caregiver activities, motivations, and impact of caregiving on the caregivers in sub-Saharan Africa. It reveals the overwhelming burden healthcare systems place on the caregivers as well as the health, economic and social-cultural aspects of caregiving in the region. As an integral part of a generally underfunded healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa, informal caregivers need to be supported by their respective governments to have better caregiving experience. Our review adds knowledge to the discussion on informal caregiving in sub-Saharan Africa, and highlights areas which should be prioritised for additional support.
Reasons of becoming a caregiver
These studies show that a relationship that is strengthened by love and the sense/feeling of responsibility over an individual appear to be the most important factors in the decision to provide care. This finding is consistent with those in other reviews with studies from across the world [ 17 , 71 ]. In our review, children as young as ten years of age also participated in providing care to people with chronic diseases. This can be explained by how responsibilities/activities are shared or delegated in many African multi-generational homes [ 33 , 72 ]. Often, children are assigned the task of providing care for unwell or elderly relatives while adults participate in income generating activities [ 33 , 72 ]. Once assigned the tasks, the children take them as their responsibility. The finding from this and other reviews [ 17 , 71 ] may mean that the reasons for becoming caregivers may not be very different across the world even with varying cultures and traditions.
Activities performed by caregivers
The caregivers, majority of whom were female and were related to the patient, performed a wide range of activities during their caregiving role. Perhaps the most striking finding is that caregivers did not end at performing the common/regular tasks like support with feeding and with personal care needs, but they did complex activities including changing colostomy bags and administering injectable medication which normally require medical skills/training to do well. This rather interesting finding points to shortage of health workers in most settings in sub-Saharan Africa. In most cases, the caregivers end up performing these tasks when health professional cannot be accessed [ 73 , 74 ]. The implication of such findings is the possibility of caregivers making numerous mistakes while conducting procedures they were not trained to perform and unknowingly endangering themselves and/or those under their care. A recent review conducted in Uganda had findings similar to ours [ 16 ]. In their study, the caregivers were mainly females, relatives of the patient and performed most activities as described in our work. The only noticeable difference is that there was no mention of the activities, that we have described as complex. This is possibly because their study either considered diseases (such as HIV) that are rarely complicated by events like surgery which may require changing colostomy bags and wound dressing or the diseases had not yet gotten to a level that required interventions like use of oxygen therapy or administration of injectable medications.
Impact of caregiving on the caregivers
To measure the impact of caregiving, almost all quantitative studies used a standardised instrument/tool. As shown in the results, a total of 14 different tools were used in the 22 studies to assess the burden of depression, anxiety, stress and financial strain. Even in the studies where the same tool was used, the results were presented differently. For example, in the studies that used Zarit burden Interview (ZBI), two [ 33 , 36 ] reported the overall mean ZBI scores while the rest provided mean scores of each category of burden. This lack of uniformity in the use of measures and presentation of results make it difficult to compare different studies’ results. In this review, ZBI tool was the most used instrument for measuring the impact of caregiving. It was used in 10 out of the 22 studies assessing the health or economic impact using an instrument. This accords with earlier observations from another review which found that ZBI was the most frequently used tool in measuring the burden of caregivers [ 75 ].
As discussed in the next three paragraphs, caregiving had both positive and negative effects on the caregivers. As expected, there were more studies focussed on the negative than positive impact of caregiving.
The rewards experienced by informal caregivers in this review can be explained by the post-traumatic growth (PTG) theory which suggests that people facing traumatic or challenging events may experience some positive outcomes from their experience [ 76 ]. Caring for people, some of whom are at an advanced stage of a chronic disease can be stressful and traumatic due to the highly demanding nature of the caregiving tasks. Such situations often prompt caregivers to do self-reflection leading to the discovery of new and positive insights as well as renewed purpose for living under the current conditions. Recent studies have used this theory to demonstrate how caregivers’ challenging experiences resulted in positive outcomes like renewed personal strength to continue in their caring role, strengthening of the relationship with care recipients/family members and taking better care of their own health because they better appreciate life [ 77 – 79 ].
As with other reviews [ 15 , 16 ] conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, caregivers with a regular source of income faced work-related challenges such as absenteeism, dismissal from work and low productivity as already listed in the results section. Caregivers’ involvement in extensive physical work like assisting patient with mobility-related activities may result into injuries and exhaustion. Depending on the patient’s care needs and severity of the disease, the caregivers may spend a lot of time with the patient. Under such circumstances, the caregivers will either fail to go to work or arrive late at work leading to reduced productivity and conflicts at work. The exhaustive nature and emotional burden that comes with caring for loved ones also reduces one’s level of concentration and performance while at work. In the end, caregivers are often dismissed or forced to resign from their work. At times, they sought employment in places with work that suited their caregiving responsibilities such as self-employment, temporary employment or jobs with flexible working hours [ 80 ]. It is also worth noting that a disrupted career/job has the potential of causing significant financial strain on the career, hinder career progression and affect retirement planning. These are likely to persist even after they are no longer providing care.
As would be expected, informal caregivers experienced both physical health and mental health challenges during their work. Several reviews have had similar findings published [ 14 – 17 ]. This is consistent with allostatic load theory, in which McEwen and Stellar observed that although stressors usually resulted in a normal physiological response as a body’s protective mechanism, exposure to high and sustained stress such as that experienced by informal caregivers caused an abnormal response that resulted in cumulative wear and tear of the body [ 81 ]. The allostatic load experienced by caregivers arises from exhaustive physical activities they do, emotional challenges caused by the patient’s condition and logistical stressors like financial strain. Part of the abnormal response includes change in the production and levels of hormones like cortisol and adrenaline which could lead to cardiovascular diseases, weakened immune system, inflammation, metabolic changes (affecting an individual’s appetite) and mental health diseases.
Limitations of the review
This review had some limitations. First, the second reviewer could only screen a proportion of studies during the title and abstract screening stage and during the full text screening. Also, a single author extracted the data from the included studies with the second reviewer checking the accuracy of the data. A study showed that a complete dual review significantly minimised random errors compared to either single review or limited dual review [ 82 ].
Secondly, we were unable to get all the full-texts of the conference abstracts that were included in this review. While the contacts for some authors could not be retrieved, the majority of those contacted either did not respond or did not have the full-texts for their abstracts available. It is therefore possible that some important studies could have been missed.
Furthermore, some studies did not provide adequate information as some data was either unclear or not reported. This includes information on sex, age and well as the impact of caregiving. This limited our ability to extract all the relevant data required to comprehensively analyse the data.
Lastly, most quantitative studies used a cross-sectional study design making it difficult to assess the cause-and-effect relationship, and to understand the changes that occur over time. However, almost half of these studies excluded participants with outcomes of interest prior to starting caregiving.
Strengths of the review
Part of the strength of this review is in the fact that we used a very broad search strategy to extensively search a good number of relevant databases. We also included non-English studies. These enabled us to capture as many relevant studies and information as possible. The use of a second reviewer improved the reliability and quality of the findings through reducing the errors and biases that could have risen if only one reviewer was involved in the review process.
Conclusions
Informal caregivers occupy an essential place in the health care system of most sub-Saharan African countries and they perform various tasks, some of which they are ill-prepared or untrained to do. The growing demand for caregivers created by the increasing chronic diseases in the African continent means that health care systems would function better if they are adjusted to prepare caregivers for the caregiving roles, and to support the physical and mental wellbeing of caregivers. Future research should investigate the most suitable tools/instruments for assessing the impact of care on the caregiver.
Supporting information
PRISMA checklist.
(DOCX)
Search strategy used in the selected databases.
(DOCX)
Table showing the quality appraisal of the reviewed articles.
(DOCX)
Table showing all studies identified in the literature search.
(XLSX)
References
1 Chang AY , Cowling K , Micah AE , Chapin A , Chen CS , Ikilezi G , et al . Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995–2050 . The Lancet [Internet]. 2019 Jun ; 393 ( 10187 ): 2233 – 60 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673619308414 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4 31030984 PMC6548764
2 Asante A , Wasike WSK , Ataguba JE . Health Financing in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Analytical Frameworks to Empirical Evaluation . Appl Health Econ Health Policy [Internet]. 2020 Dec 4 ; 18 ( 6 ): 743 – 6 . Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-020-00618-0 doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00618-0 33145665 PMC7609366
3 Ly MS , Bassoum O , Faye A . Universal health insurance in Africa: a narrative review of the literature on institutional models . BMJ Glob Health [Internet]. 2022 Apr 28 ; 7 ( 4 ): e008219 . Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008219 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008219 35483710 PMC9052052
4 Barasa E , Kazungu J , Nguhiu P , Ravishankar N . Examining the level and inequality in health insurance coverage in 36 sub-Saharan African countries . BMJ Glob Health [Internet]. 2021 Apr 26 ; 6 ( 4 ): e004712 . Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004712 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004712 33903176 PMC8076950
5 Lebina L , Kawonga M , Oni T , Kim HY , Alaba OA . The cost and cost implications of implementing the integrated chronic disease management model in South Africa . PLoS One . 2020 Jun 26 ; 15 ( 6 ): e0235429 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235429 32589690 PMC7319351
6 WHO. Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
7 Bigna JJ , Noubiap JJ . The rising burden of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa . Lancet Glob Health [Internet]. 2019 Oct ; 7 ( 10 ): e1295 – 6 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X19303705 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30370-5 31537347
8 Roth DL , Fredman L , Haley WE . Informal Caregiving and Its Impact on Health: A Reappraisal from Population-Based Studies . Gerontologist [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Jul 24]; 55 ( 2 ): 309 – 19 . Available from: https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/55/2/309/656865 doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu177 26035608 PMC6584119
9 Adejoh SO , Boele F , Akeju D , Dandadzi A , Nabirye E , Namisango E , et al . The role, impact, and support of informal caregivers in the delivery of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A multi-country qualitative study . Palliat Med [Internet]. 2021 Mar 23 ; 35 ( 3 ): 552 – 62 . Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269216320974925 doi: 10.1177/0269216320974925 33353484 PMC7975852
10 Gambe RG , Clark J , Meddick-dyson SA , Ukoha-Kalu BO , Nyaaba GN , Murtagh FEM . The roles and experiences of informal carers providing care to people with advanced cancer in Africa—A systematic review and critical interpretive analysis . PLOS Glob Public Health [Internet]. 2023 ; 3 ( 4 ): 1 – 18 . Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001785 37027360 PMC10081800
11 Maree JE , Moshima D , Ngubeni M , Zondi L . On being a caregiver: The experiences of South African family caregivers caring for cancer patients . Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) [Internet]. 2018 Mar ; 27 ( 2 ): e12801 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecc.12801 doi: 10.1111/ecc.12801 29265503
12 Walubita M , Sikateyo B , Zulu JM . Challenges for health care providers, parents and patients who face a child hood cancer diagnosis in Zambia . BMC Health Serv Res . 2018 Dec 2 ; 18 ( 1 ): 314 . doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3127-5 29720168 PMC5932785
13 Njororai F , Njororai WWS . Older adult caregivers to people with HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of literature and policy implications for change . Int J Health Promot Educ . 2013 ; 51 ( 5 ): 248 – 66 .
14 Gysels M , Pell C , Straus L , Pool R . End of life care in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of the qualitative literature . BMC Palliat Care . 2011 ; 10 ( 1 ). doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-10-6 21388538 PMC3070681
15 Addo R , Agyemang SA , Tozan Y , Nonvignon J . Economic burden of caregiving for persons with severe mental illness in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review . Bowen M , editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 Aug 9 ; 13 ( 8 ): e0199830 . Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199830 30092073 PMC6084810
16 Komuhangi A , Jenkins C , Nakaggwa F , Agaba P , Githinji F , Ewuzie A , et al . The needs, challenges, and burden experienced by informal caregivers in Uganda: a scoping review . Discover Social Science and Health [Internet]. 2022 Jan 10 [cited 2022 Aug 22]; 2 ( 1 ): 1 – 28 . Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44155-022-00004-2
17 Hogan U , Bingley A , Morbey H , Walshe C . The experience of informal caregivers in providing patient care in hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative meta-synthesis [Internet]. Vol. 27, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England; 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 30]. p. 321–9. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13558196221101968 10.1177/13558196221101968 PMC9548935 35592881
18 Page MJ , McKenzie JE , Bossuyt PM , Boutron I , Hoffmann TC , Mulrow CD , et al . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29 ;n71. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.n71 10.1136/bmj.n71 PMC8005924 33782057
19 Fong JH . Disability incidence and functional decline among older adults with major chronic diseases . BMC Geriatr [Internet]. 2019 Dec 21 ; 19 ( 1 ): 323 . Available from: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-019-1348-z doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1348-z 31752701 PMC6873710
20 Sadigh M , Nawagi F , Sadigh M . The Economic and Social Impact of Informal Caregivers at Mulago National Referral Hospital ,. Ann Glob Health [Internet]. 2016 ; 82 ( 5 ): 866 – 74 . Available from: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.06.005 28283141
21 Gertrude N , Kawuma R , Nalukenge W , Kamacooko O , Yperzeele L , Cras P , et al . Caring for a stroke patient: The burden and experiences of primary caregivers in Uganda–A qualitative study . Nurs Open [Internet]. 2019 Oct 4 [cited 2022 Aug 30]; 6 ( 4 ): 1551 – 8 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nop2.356 doi: 10.1002/nop2.356 31660183 PMC6805272
22 Jackson JL , Kuriyama A , Anton A , Choi A , Fournier JP , Geier AK , et al . The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non–English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews . Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2019 Nov 5 ; 171 ( 9 ): 677 . Available from: https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2739791/accuracy-google-translate-abstracting-data-from-non-english-language-trials doi: 10.7326/M19-0891 31357212
23 Souto RQ , Khanassov V , Hong QN , Bush PL , Vedel I , Pluye P . Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool . Int J Nurs Stud . 2015 ; 52 ( 1 ): 500 – 1 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.010 25241931
24 Pace R , Pluye P , Bartlett G , Macaulay AC , Salsberg J , Jagosh J , et al . Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review . Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2012 Jan ; 49 ( 1 ): 47 – 53 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748911002665 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 21835406
25 Mlaba PC , Ginindza T , Hlongwana K . Family caregivers’ perspectives of the economic burden imposed through caring for family members with cancer in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa . Southern African Journal of Social Work and Social Development . 2020 ; 32 ( 3 ). Available from: https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/SWPR/article/view/7099
26 Mlaba PC , Ginindza TG , Hlongwana KW . The social burden experienced by families caring for members living with cancer in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa . Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med [Internet]. 2021 Oct 25 ; 13 ( 1 ): 1 – 10 . Available from: http://www.phcfm.org/index.php/PHCFM/article/view/2955 doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2955 34797113 PMC8603144
27 Owoo B , Ninnoni JP , Ampofo EA , Seidu AA . Challenges encountered by family caregivers of prostate cancer patients in Cape Coast, Ghana: a descriptive phenomenological study . BMC Palliat Care . 2022 Dec 14 ; 21 ( 1 ): 108 . doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00993-6 35701817 PMC9195311
28 Owoo B , Ninnoni JPK , Ampofo EA , Seidu AA . “ I always find myself very tired and exhausted”: The physical impact of caring; a descriptive phenomenological study of the experiences of prostate cancer caregivers in Cape Coast, Ghana . PLoS One . 2022 Jul 26 ; 17 ( 7 ): e0268627 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268627 35881590 PMC9321373
29 Tchokote EC . Vécu des aidants familiaux prodiguant des soins à leurs parents atteints d’un accident vasculaire cérébral au Cameroun: analyse interprétative phénoménologique . Rech Soins Infirm . 2020 May 25 ;N° 140 ( 1 ): 97 – 106 . 10.3917/rsi.140.0097 35724019
30 Serfontein L , Visser M , van Schalkwyk M , van Rooyen C . The perceived burden of care among caregivers of survivors of cerebrovascular accident following discharge from a private rehabilitation unit . South African Journal of Occupational Therapy . 2019 ; 49 ( 2 ): 24 – 32 .
31 Scheffler E , Mash R . Surviving a stroke in South Africa: outcomes of home-based care in a low-resource rural setting . Top Stroke Rehabil [Internet]. 2019 Aug 18 ; 26 ( 6 ): 423 – 34 . Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10749357.2019.1623473 doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1623473 31169468
32 Jones MP , Howitt SC , Jusabani A , Gray WK , Aris E , Mugusi F , et al . Anxiety and depression in incident stroke survivors and their carers in rural Tanzania: A case-control follow-up study over five years . Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res [Internet]. 2012 Jun ; 18 ( 3 ): 122 – 8 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0941950012000097
33 Yusuf AJ , Adamu A , Nuhu FT . Caregiver burden among poor caregivers of patients with cancer in an urban African setting . Psychooncology . 2011 Aug ; 20 ( 8 ): 902 – 5 . doi: 10.1002/pon.1814 20680930
34 Vincent-Onabajo G , Daniel H , Lawan A , Usman Ali M , Ali Masta M , Modu A . Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Family Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors in Nigeria . J Caring Sci . 2018 Jun 1 ; 7 ( 2 ): 59 – 66 . doi: 10.15171/jcs.2018.010 29977875 PMC6029650
35 Onyeneho CA , Ilesanmi RE . Burden of Care and Perceived Psycho-Social Outcomes among Family Caregivers of Patients Living with Cancer . Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs . 2021 May ; 8 ( 3 ): 330 – 6 . doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.308678 33850967 PMC8030593
36 Okeke PC , Oparah SK , Oboke SO , Inem V . Care Burden Correlates with Depression among Informal Caregivers of Stroke Patients: A Cross Sectional Study in Lagos, Nigeria . International Journal of Caring Sciences [Internet] 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 14]; 13 ( 2 ): 1402 – 10 . Available from: https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/66_1_oparah_original_13_2.pdf
37 Ohaeri JU , Campbell OB , Ilesanmi AO , Omigbodun AO . The psychosocial burden of caring for some Nigerian women with breast cancer and cervical cancer . Soc Sci Med . 1999 Dec ; 49 ( 11 ): 1541 – 9 . doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00223-3 10515635
38 Ogunmodede AJ , Abiodun O , Makanjuola AB , Olarinoye JK , Ogunmodede JA , Buhari OI . Burden of Care and Psychological Distress in Primary Caregivers of Patients with Type -2 Diabetes Mellitus in A Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria . Ethiop J Health Sci . 2019 Nov 1 ; 29 ( 6 ): 697 – 708 . doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i6.6 31741640 PMC6842725
39 Gbiri CA , Olawale OA , Isaac SO . Stroke management: Informal caregivers’ burdens and strians of caring for stroke survivors . Ann Phys Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2022 Aug 31]; 58 ( 2 ): 98 – 103 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187706571401834X doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.017 25752228
40 Duru CO , Okpokowuruk FS , Adesina AD , Worgu GO , Adeniji FO , Chinawa JM , et al . Caring for Children with Congenital Heart Diseases:Economic Burden of Pre-Surgical Management on Nigerian Families . West Afr J Med [Internet]. 2021 ; 38 ( 2 ): 144 – 51 . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641149 33641149
41 Akpan-Idiok PA , Anarado AN . Perceptions of burden of caregiving by informal caregivers of cancer patients attending University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria . Pan African Medical Journal [Internet]. 2014 ; 18 . Available from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/18/159/full/ doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.159.2995 25419297 PMC4236844
42 Abba MA , Ahmad UA , Maje AU , Haruna AZ , Ibrahim AA . Musculoskeletal Pain and Associated Factors Among Informal Caregivers of Stroke Survivors in Northwestern Nigeria . Modern Care Journal [Internet]. 2022 May 1 ; 19 ( 2 ). Available from: https://brieflands.com/articles/mcj-123216.html
43 Ogunyemi A , Umoru AK , Alabi AO , Adegboyega BC , Otokpa E . Caregiving Burden among Informal Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Lagos, Nigeria . Research Square (Research Square) . 2021 Aug 23 ; Available from: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-769222/v1
44 Thomas M , Greenop K . Caregiver experiences and perceptions of stroke . Health SA Gesondheid . 2008 Nov 12 ; 13 ( 1 ): 29 – 40 . Available from: https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/255/245
45 Mthembu TG , Brown Z , Cupido A , Razack G , Wassung D . Family caregivers’ perceptions and experiences regarding caring for older adults with chronic diseases . South African Journal of Occupational Therapy [Internet]. 2016 ; 46 ( 1 ): 83 – 8 . Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2310-38332016000100015
46 Masuku KP , Mophosho M , Tshabalala M . ‘I felt pain. Deep pain…’: Experiences of primary caregivers of stroke survivors with aphasia in a South African township . Afr J Disabil [Internet]. 2018 Mar 8 ; 7 . Available from: https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/view/368 10.4102/ajod.v7i0.368 PMC5843930 29535917
47 Ketlogetswe TS , Jansen Van Rensburg JJ , Maree JE . The experiences of caregivers of patients living with cancer admitted to a hospice in South Africa . Int J Palliat Nurs [Internet]. 2022 Apr 2 ; 28 ( 4 ): 164 – 71 . Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.164 doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.164 35465701
48 Gawulayo S , Erasmus CJ , Rhoda AJ . Family functioning and stroke: Family members’ perspectives . Afr J Disabil [Internet]. 2021 Oct 25 ;10. Available from: http://www.ajod.org/index.php/AJOD/article/view/801 doi: 10.4102/ajod.v10i0.801 34858798 PMC8603059
49 Dhada B , Blackbeard D . Caregivers of children with diabetes mellitus: challenges of caring for and perceptions of consultations in a South African public sector context . South African Family Practice [Internet]. 2019 Aug 23 ; 61 ( 4 ): 117 – 35 . Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20786190.2019.1606491
50 Bessa Y , Moore A , Amey F . Caring for a Loved One with Cancer: It Is My Job . J Psychosoc Oncol [Internet]. 2012 Mar ; 30 ( 2 ): 217 – 38 . Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07347332.2011.644397 doi: 10.1080/07347332.2011.644397 22416957
51 Marima P , Gunduza R , Machando D , Dambi JM . Correlates of social support on report of probable common mental disorders in Zimbabwean informal caregivers of patients with stroke: a cross-sectional survey . BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2019 Dec 16 ; 12 ( 1 ): 514 . Available from: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-019-4551-2 doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4551-2 31420002 PMC6697905
52 Muriuki MM , Oluchina S , Mbithi BW . Assessment of role strain among family caregivers of adult patients with cancer at a national referral hospital in Kenya . Psychooncology [Internet]. 2023 Jan 30 [cited 2023 Jul 31]; 32 ( 1 ): 42 – 6 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pon.5868 doi: 10.1002/pon.5868 34967495
53 Yousif M , Abdelrahman A , Al Jamea LH , Al-Yami FS , Woodman A . Psychosocial Impact of Sickle Cell Disease and Diabetes Mellitus on Affected Children and Their Parents in Khartoum State, Sudan . J Trop Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 Apr 5 ; 68 ( 3 ). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/tropej/article/doi/10.1093/tropej/fmac042/6596143 doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmac042 35641127
54 Kitoko GM Bin , Vivalya BMN , Vagheni MM , Matonda Ma Nzuzi T , Mampunza Lusambulu S , Lelo GM , et al . Psychological burden in stroke survivors and caregivers dyads at the rehabilitation center of Kinshasa (Democratic Republic of Congo): A cross-sectional study . Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases [Internet]. 2022 Jun ; 31 ( 6 ): 106447 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1052305722001434 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106447 35367847
55 Khondowe O , Rhoda A , Mpofu R . Perceived needs of caregivers of stroke patients’ receiving out-patient physiotherapy treatment in Lusaka, Zambia . South African Journal of Physiotherapy [Internet]. 2007 Feb 18 ; 63 ( 1 ). Available from: http://sajp.co.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/122
56 BeLue R , Ndiaye K , Miranda P , Ndao F , Canagarajah P . Diabetes management in Senegalese families: A dyadic-narrative illustration . Chronic Illness [Internet]. 2018 Sep 1 ; 14 ( 3 ): 182 – 93 . Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1742395317719141 doi: 10.1177/1742395317719141 28762776
57 Wassie LA , Azagew AW , Bifftu BB . Depression and its associated factors among primary caregivers of adult cancer patients at Northwest Amhara Regional States Referrals Hospitals oncology treatment units, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021 . BMC Psychiatry . 2022 Aug 6 ; 22 ( 1 ): 533 . doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04182-w 35931980 PMC9356402
58 Masika GM , Gottvall M , Kohi TW , von Essen L , Dol JS . Concerns and Needs of Support Among Guardians of Children on Cancer Treatment in Dar es Salaam: A Qualitative Study . Cancer Nurs [Internet]. 2020 Nov ; 43 ( 6 ): E342 – 8 . Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000722 doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000722 31107702
59 Dawson CP , Aryeetey GC , Agyemang SA , Mensah K , Addo R , Nonvignon J . Costs, burden and quality of life associated with informal caregiving for children with Lymphoma attending a tertiary hospital in Ghana . Int J Care Coord [Internet]. 2020 Dec 4 ; 23 ( 4 ): 165 – 72 . Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053434520981357
60 Muliira JK , Kizza IB . The other untold burden of cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: Anxiety and depressive symptoms among family caregivers of adult cancer patients . Int J Afr Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2019 ; 11 : 100166 . Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214139118301525
61 Katende G , Nakimera L . Prevalence and correlates of anxiety and depression among family carers of cancer patients in a cancer care and treatment facility in Uganda: a cross-sectional study . Afr Health Sci [Internet]. 2017 Sep 18 [cited 2022 Aug 30]; 17 ( 3 ): 868 . Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5656193/ doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i3.30 29085415 PMC5656193
62 Malangwa G , Mangi EJ . Psychological Distress Factors among Caregivers of Children Receiving Cancer Therapy, at Muhimbili National Hospital . East African Health Research Journal . 2022 Jul 27 ; 6 ( 1 ): 70 – 7 . doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.681 36424942 PMC9639614
63 Mensah ABB , Adamu B , Mensah KB , Dzomeku VM , Agbadi P , Kusi G , et al . Exploring the social stressors and resources of husbands of women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer in their role as primary caregivers in Kumasi, Ghana . Supportive Care in Cancer [Internet]. 2021 May 11 ; 29 ( 5 ): 2335 – 45 . Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-020-05716-2 doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05716-2 32915296
64 Mekonnen H , Gebreyohannis GT , Cherie A . Depression and associated factors among parents of children diagnosed with cancer at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia . Psychooncology [Internet]. 2020 Jul 3 ; 29 ( 7 ): 1141 – 7 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pon.5389 doi: 10.1002/pon.5389 32281208
65 Esmaili BE , Stewart KA , Masalu NA , Schroeder KM . Qualitative Analysis of Palliative Care for Pediatric Patients With Cancer at Bugando Medical Center: An Evaluation of Barriers to Providing End-of-Life Care in a Resource-Limited Setting . J Glob Oncol [Internet]. 2018 Dec ;( 4 ): 1 – 10 . Available from: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.17.00047 10.1200/JGO.17.00047 PMC6223406 30084714
66 Bekui BAA , Ohene LA , Badzi C , Ampomah MO , Aziato L . Physical and socioeconomic burden of caregiving on family caregivers of children with cancer at a tertiary Hospital in Ghana . Nurs Open [Internet]. 2023 Feb 20 ; 10 ( 2 ): 915 – 25 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nop2.1359 doi: 10.1002/nop2.1359 36126082 PMC9834190
67 Ababacar MK , Assane S , Saliou MS , Ousmane C , Kamadore T , Mamadou K . Psychosocial and Economic Evaluation of Stroke Management in the Elderly: A Prospective Study at the Neurology Department of the CHNU of FANN-Dakar . Acta Scientific MEDICAL SCIENCES . 2022 ; 6 ( 6 ). Available from: https://www.actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-06-1270.pdf
68 Gosse RA , Msengi EA , Chona EZ , Ambikile JS . Experiences of caring for women with cervical cancer: A qualitative study among male partners in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania . Health Expectations . 2024 Apr ; 27 ( 2 ). doi: 10.1111/hex.14038 38561909 PMC10985225
69 Najjuka SM , Iradukunda A , Kaggwa MM , Sebbowa AN , Mirembe J , Ndyamuhaki K , et al . The caring experiences of family caregivers for patients with advanced cancer in Uganda: A qualitative study . PLoS One . 2023 Oct 25 ; 18 ( 10 ): e0293109 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293109 37878610 PMC10599584
70 Vouking MZ , Takougang I , Mbam LM , Mbuagbaw L , Tadenfok CN , Tamo CV . The contribution of community health workers to the control of Buruli ulcer in the Ngoantet area, Cameroon . Pan African Medical Journal [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Jun 29]; 16 : 63 . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24711863 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.63.1407 24711863 PMC3976652
71 Greenwood N , Smith R . Motivations for being informal carers of people living with dementia: a systematic review of qualitative literature . BMC Geriatr [Internet]. 2019 Dec 17 ; 19 ( 1 ): 169 . Available from: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-019-1185-0 doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1185-0 31208351 PMC6580594
72 Evans R. Children as Caregivers . In: Handbook of Child Well-Being [Internet]. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands ; 2014 . p. 1893 – 916 . Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_173
73 Afriyie DO , Nyoni J , Ahmat A . The state of strategic plans for the health workforce in Africa . BMJ Glob Health . 2019 ; 4 (Suppl 9 ): e001115 . doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001115 31681482 PMC6797437
74 Anyangwe SCE , Mtonga C . Inequities in the global health workforce: The greatest impediment to health in Sub-Saharan Africa . Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2007 ; 4 ( 2 ): 93 – 100 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph2007040002 17617671 PMC3728573
75 Mosquera I , Vergara I , Larrañaga I , Machón M , del Río M , Calderón C . Measuring the impact of informal elderly caregiving: a systematic review of tools . Quality of Life Research . 2016 May 16 ; 25 ( 5 ): 1059 – 92 . doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1159-4 26475138
76 Tedeschi RG , Calhoun LG . The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma . J Trauma Stress . 1996 ; 9 ( 3 ): 455 – 71 . doi: 10.1007/BF02103658 8827649
77 Nouzari R , Najafi SS , Momennasab M . Post-Traumatic Growth among Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients and Its Association with Social Support and Hope . Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery . 2019 Oct ; 7 ( 4 ): 319 – 28 . doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.73959.0 31641681 PMC6779924
78 Gil-González I , Pérez-San-Gregorio MÁ , Funuyet-Salas J , Conrad R , Martín-Rodríguez A . Significance of Post-Traumatic Growth and Mental Health for Coping in Multiple Sclerosis Caregivers . Healthcare . 2023 May 11 ; 11 ( 10 ): 1390 . doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101390 37239676 PMC10217937
79 Ni ZH , Lv HT , Wu JH , Wang F . Post-traumatic growth in caregivers of children hospitalized in the PICU due to traffic accident: a qualitative study . BMC Nurs . 2023 Feb 23 ; 22 ( 1 ): 48 . doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01213-z 36814264 PMC9948375
80 Longacre ML , Valdmanis VG , Handorf EA , Fang CY . Work Impact and Emotional Stress Among Informal Caregivers for Older Adults . J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci [Internet]. 2016 Apr 5 ;gbw027. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/geronb/gbw027 10.1093/geronb/gbw027 PMC5926991 27048567
81 McEwen BS , Stellar E . Stress and the Individual: Mechanisms Leading to Disease . Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 1993 Sep 27 ; 153 ( 18 ): 2093 – 101 . Available from: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004 8379800
82 Stoll CRT , Izadi S , Fowler S , Green P , Suls J , Colditz GA . The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews . Res Synth Methods [Internet]. 2019 Dec 18 ; 10 ( 4 ): 539 – 45 . Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1369 doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1369 31272125 PMC6989049