Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2002
Contrast-enhanced CT with saline flush technique using two automated injectors: how much contrast medium does it save?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Irie Toshiyuki, Kajitani Motonao, Yamaguchi Masayuki, Itai Yuji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to investigate the volume of contrast medium saved by the saline flush technique.
METHOD: Thoracic helical CT was performed by injecting 75 ml of contrast material (Ioversol 320) only (n = 25; Group A) or 75 ml of contrast medium pushed with 6 ml (n = 25; Group B), 12 ml (n = 25; Group C), 25 ml (n = 25; Group D), or 50 ml (n = 25; Group E) of saline at a rate of 2 ml/s. The aortic CT numbers were measured from 30 to 55 s after the beginning of injection. We compared the time to peak aortic enhancement (TPAE) among Groups A-E.
RESULTS: The TPAEs of the Groups A-E were 42.6, 45.2, 48.6, 48.4, and 48.3 s, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference among them (p < 0.0001, analysis of variance). Post hoc test revealed statistically significant differences in TPAE between Groups A and B, C, D, and E and between Groups B and C, D, and E but no differences among Groups C, D, and E.
CONCLUSION: The saline flush technique prolongs TPAE by 6 s and saves 12 ml of contrast medium.
METHOD: Thoracic helical CT was performed by injecting 75 ml of contrast material (Ioversol 320) only (n = 25; Group A) or 75 ml of contrast medium pushed with 6 ml (n = 25; Group B), 12 ml (n = 25; Group C), 25 ml (n = 25; Group D), or 50 ml (n = 25; Group E) of saline at a rate of 2 ml/s. The aortic CT numbers were measured from 30 to 55 s after the beginning of injection. We compared the time to peak aortic enhancement (TPAE) among Groups A-E.
RESULTS: The TPAEs of the Groups A-E were 42.6, 45.2, 48.6, 48.4, and 48.3 s, respectively, and there was a statistically significant difference among them (p < 0.0001, analysis of variance). Post hoc test revealed statistically significant differences in TPAE between Groups A and B, C, D, and E and between Groups B and C, D, and E but no differences among Groups C, D, and E.
CONCLUSION: The saline flush technique prolongs TPAE by 6 s and saves 12 ml of contrast medium.