Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1999
The pulmonary venous systolic flow pulse--its origin and relationship to left atrial pressure.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smiseth O A, Thompson C R, Lohavanichbutr K, Ling H, Abel J G, Miyagishima R T, Lichtenstein S V, Bowering J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the pulmonary venous systolic flow pulse using wave-intensity analysis to separate forward- and backward-going waves.
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the pulmonary venous systolic flow pulse is unclear and could be a "suction effect" due to a fall in atrial pressure (backward-going wave) or a "pushing effect" due to forward-propagation of right ventricular (RV) pressure (forward-going wave).
METHODS: In eight patients during coronary surgery, pulmonary venous flow (flow probe), velocity (microsensor) and pressure (micromanometer) were recorded. We calculated wave intensity (dP x dU) as change in pulmonary venous pressure (dP) times change in velocity (dU) at 5 ms intervals. When dP x dU > 0 there is a net forward-going wave and when dP x dU < 0 there is a net backward-going wave.
RESULTS: Systolic pulmonary venous flow was biphasic. When flow accelerated in early systole (S1), pulmonary venous pressure was falling, and, therefore, dP x dU was negative, -0.6 +/- 0.2 (x +/- SE) W/m2, indicating a net backward-going wave. When flow accelerated in late systole (S2), pressure was rising, and, therefore, dP x dU was positive, 0.3 +/- 0.1 W/m2, indicating a net forward-going wave.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary venous flow acceleration in S1 was attributed to a net backward-going wave secondary to a fall in atrial pressure. However, flow acceleration in S2 was attributed to a net forward-going wave, consistent with propagation of the RV systolic pressure pulse across the lungs. Pulmonary vein systolic flow pattern, therefore, appears to be determined by right- as well as left-sided cardiac events.
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the pulmonary venous systolic flow pulse is unclear and could be a "suction effect" due to a fall in atrial pressure (backward-going wave) or a "pushing effect" due to forward-propagation of right ventricular (RV) pressure (forward-going wave).
METHODS: In eight patients during coronary surgery, pulmonary venous flow (flow probe), velocity (microsensor) and pressure (micromanometer) were recorded. We calculated wave intensity (dP x dU) as change in pulmonary venous pressure (dP) times change in velocity (dU) at 5 ms intervals. When dP x dU > 0 there is a net forward-going wave and when dP x dU < 0 there is a net backward-going wave.
RESULTS: Systolic pulmonary venous flow was biphasic. When flow accelerated in early systole (S1), pulmonary venous pressure was falling, and, therefore, dP x dU was negative, -0.6 +/- 0.2 (x +/- SE) W/m2, indicating a net backward-going wave. When flow accelerated in late systole (S2), pressure was rising, and, therefore, dP x dU was positive, 0.3 +/- 0.1 W/m2, indicating a net forward-going wave.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary venous flow acceleration in S1 was attributed to a net backward-going wave secondary to a fall in atrial pressure. However, flow acceleration in S2 was attributed to a net forward-going wave, consistent with propagation of the RV systolic pressure pulse across the lungs. Pulmonary vein systolic flow pattern, therefore, appears to be determined by right- as well as left-sided cardiac events.