European journal of haematology · 2020
Impact of performance status on overall survival in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: Real-life outcomes of daratumumab treatment.
Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Afram G, Gran C, Borg Bruchfeld J, Wagner AK, Hussain A, Alici E, Nahi H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Little is reported on the real-life impact of daratumumab in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients (RRMM). We analyzed a cohort of 156 patients who received daratumumab as a single agent concerning ECOG status, eGFR, cytogenetics, lines of prior treatment, and their impact on survival.
RESULTS: Eighty-two (53%) patients were triple refractory, 54 (35%) patients were single or double refractory, and 20 (12%) patients were non-refractory. Following daratumumab treatment, the progression-free survival (PFS) in these groups was 7.2%, 11.4%, and 53% (P < .001), and overall survival (OS) was 34%, 73%, and 58% (P < .001) at 36 months, respectively. Poor ECOG, three lines of prior treatment, and triple refractoriness were all associated with inferior PFS and OS in a multivariate analysis including ECOG, high-risk chromosomal aberrations, refractoriness, number of treatment lines, and eGFR.
CONCLUSION: Daratumumab remains an attractive treatment option, especially in patients with poor performance and increased frailty. Furthermore, our observations suggest that patients with ECOG 2 and 3 status require additional supportive and/or palliative therapies to compensate for a potentially effective but encompassing late-line therapy. In conclusion, further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the impact of ECOG 2 and 3 status in patients with RRMM.
RESULTS: Eighty-two (53%) patients were triple refractory, 54 (35%) patients were single or double refractory, and 20 (12%) patients were non-refractory. Following daratumumab treatment, the progression-free survival (PFS) in these groups was 7.2%, 11.4%, and 53% (P < .001), and overall survival (OS) was 34%, 73%, and 58% (P < .001) at 36 months, respectively. Poor ECOG, three lines of prior treatment, and triple refractoriness were all associated with inferior PFS and OS in a multivariate analysis including ECOG, high-risk chromosomal aberrations, refractoriness, number of treatment lines, and eGFR.
CONCLUSION: Daratumumab remains an attractive treatment option, especially in patients with poor performance and increased frailty. Furthermore, our observations suggest that patients with ECOG 2 and 3 status require additional supportive and/or palliative therapies to compensate for a potentially effective but encompassing late-line therapy. In conclusion, further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the impact of ECOG 2 and 3 status in patients with RRMM.