Prognostic value of circulating markers of neutrophil activation, neutrophil extracellular traps, coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with terminal cancer.

Introduction

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Predicting survival in patients with advanced cancer is important because both clinical and personal decisions are affected by life expectancy 1 . Studies have shown that physicians' survival estimates are unreliable and overly optimistic 2 , 3 , which could lead to unnecessary interventions toward the end of life. Objective prognostic tools are therefore needed to assist clinicians in assessing prognosis in patients with advanced cancer. Various prognostic assessment tools for terminal cancer patients have been proposed 4 – 7 , but few are used in clinical practice.

Cancer induces a hypercoagulable state that increases with cancer progression and tumor burden 8 and increases the risk of thromboembolic complications 9 , 10 . Several studies have proposed that various coagulation and fibrinolysis markers in plasma can be used to predict thrombotic complications 11 , 12 , clinical outcome 13 and mortality 14 – 17 in cancer patients. D-dimer has previously been shown to be an independent prognostic factor for mortality in patients with a wide range of malignancies 14 , 18 – 20 . High levels of extracellular vesicle tissue factor (EV TF) activity have also been associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients 21 – 23 . In breast cancer, there is an association between plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and poor prognosis 13 , 15 .

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are chromatin structures released from neutrophils in response to a variety of stimuli. Although first described as part of our innate immunity and induced by microbial pathogens, several other “NET inducers” have been proposed, including a plethora of factors also associated with the tumor microenvironment, including soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) 24 , interleukin-8 (IL-8) 25 , and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 26 . High levels of IL-8 27 , 28 , sP-selectin 17 , 29 , 30 and the neutrophil activation marker neutrophil elastase (NE) 27 , 31 , are prognostic in patients with cancer. We and others recently showed that markers of neutrophil activation, including citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit), a marker of NETs, are associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with terminal cancer 27 , 32 . NETs have also been shown to contribute to enhanced coagulation 33 , a well-known phenomenon in cancer patients 34 .

The objective of this study was to extend our recent findings 27 showing a prognostic value of plasma H3Cit in terminal cancer by measuring neutrophil activation markers, NET markers and proposed NET inducers, as well as markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis in terminal cancer. In line with our recent study 27 , we found that markers of neutrophil activation and NETs were prognostic in terminal cancer patients. Contrary to our hypothesis, markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis did not have a prognostic value and there were weak or no correlations between these markers and markers of neutrophil activation and NETs.

Methods

Study population

One-hundred and six cancer patients were prospectively recruited at the palliative care unit at Stockholms sjukhem, Stockholm, Sweden, between October 2016 and May 2018. Inclusion criteria were active cancer, defined as diagnosis < 1 year and/or disseminated disease, intact cognition and the ability to understand spoken and written Swedish. Inclusion was conducted consecutively twice-weekly when research personnel were available. There were no exclusion criteria. Information on demographic data, comorbidity and on-going medical treatment was collected from hospital records.

Median age was 73 years (IQR 66–81) and 38 patients were men (36%) in the terminal cancer group. The most frequent tumor sites were breast (18%), prostate (16%) and lung (13%), and 89% of patients had known metastatic solid cancer. Demographic data, comorbidity and cancer sites are presented in Table 1 . Median survival was 31 days, and 8 (7.5%) patients were alive at the end of the observation period of 180 days. A survival curve of the patient population over 180 days is presented as Supplementary Fig. S1 .

31 healthy and age-matched individuals were included as controls. Exclusion criteria were active or prior cancer diagnosis. Median age was 71 years (IQR 71–73) and 24 individuals were men (77%) in the healthy control group.

All procedures were in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. All patients and healthy controls signed written informed consent. The study was approved by the regional ethical review board in Stockholm (Dnr 2015/1533–31/1, 2016/359–32, 2016/1102–32, 2016/2051–32/1, 2017/1837–32 and 2018/1845–32/1).

Laboratory analyses

Venous blood sampling was performed once at study inclusion. Platelet-poor plasma was prepared from citrated whole blood following immediate centrifugation for 20 min at 2000 × g at room temperature, after which they were stored at − 80 °C until further analyses. Samples were thawed on ice at the time of analyses.

Circulating markers were measured as follows: NE using the PMN Elastase Human ELISA Kit (Abcam), sP-selectin using the human sP-selectin/CD62P ELISA Kit (R&D Systems), IL-8 using the V-Plex Human IL-8 Kit (Meso Scale Diagnostics), G-CSF using the Quantikine Human G-CSF Immunoassay (R&D Systems), thrombin antithrombin complexes (TAT) using the Enzygnost TAT micro (Siemens), D-dimer using the Asserachrom D-DI (Diagnostica Stago) and PAI-1 using the Human PAI-1 Activity ELISA Kit (Molecular Innovations), all according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Nucleosomal H3Cit (H3Cit-DNA) was quantified using a recently validated and highly specific in-house capture ELISA 35 . Briefly, microplates were coated with a monoclonal anti-histone H3 (citrulline R8) antibody (Abcam, Cat# 232,939) and a monoclonal anti-DNA antibody (Cell Death ELISA PLUS , Roche) was used for detection. A standard curve was generated by semi-synthetic recombinant nucleosomes, containing citrulline at the 2, 8 and 17th arginine residue of the N-terminal of histone H3. (EpiCypher, Cat#16–1362).

The EV TF activity assay was performed as described previously 36 .

Statistical analyses

Shapiro–Wilk normality test was used to test for normal and lognormal distributions,. Standard deviations are reported for parametric data, and medians and interquartile ranges for non-parametric data. The student t test was used for parametric data, and the Mann Whitney U test for non-parametric data. The Fisher exact test was used to compare proportions. Correlations were investigated with Spearman rank correlation.

Cox regression analyses were performed including the circulating markers as continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models determined the hazard ratio (HR) of death. In multivariate analysis, adjustment was made for age, sex, metastatic disease and medical treatment (oral anticoagulants, low molecular weight heparins [LMWHs] and corticosteroids). Stata 16 (StataCorp, Houston, TX, USA) was used for Cox models. All remaining statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A two-sided P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Markers of neutrophil activation and NETs are elevated and prognostic in patients with terminal cancer

To assess the degree of neutrophil activation and NET formation in patients with terminal cancer, we quantified markers of neutrophil activation (NE), NET formation (H3Cit-DNA) as well as proposed NET inducers (sP-selectin, IL-8 and G-CSF). NE (threefold median increase), H3Cit-DNA (eightfold median increase), sP-selectin (1.7-fold median increase), IL-8 (fivefold median increase) and G-CSF were all elevated in patients with terminal cancer compared to healthy controls (Fig. 1 a–e). Elevated levels of H3Cit-DNA were seen in all investigated tumor types (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 ). NE and H3Cit-DNA showed moderate correlations with sP-selectin and IL-8, but not with G-CSF (Table 2 ). We found a strong correlation between plasma H3Cit-DNA levels and the neutrophil activation marker NE (Table 2 ). The neutrophil activation marker NE and the NET marker H3Cit-DNA were both associated with poor prognosis in uni- and multivariate Cox regression (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S3 ). Furthermore, the proposed NET inducers sP-selectin, IL-8 and G-CSF were also strongly associated with prognosis in Cox regression (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S3 ). To enable comparison, variables were Z-transformed. The marker with the strongest association to poor prognosis in multivariate analysis with adjustments for age, sex, metastatic disease and medical treatments (oral anticoagulants, low molecular weight heparins [LMWHs] and corticosteroids) was NE, followed by sP-selectin, H3Cit-DNA and G-CSF.

Markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis are elevated but not prognostic in patients with terminal cancer

To investigate coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with terminal cancer, we quantified procoagulant and anti-fibrinolytic circulating markers as well as markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis (EV TF activity, PAI-1, TAT, and D-dimer). EV TF activity, PAI-1 (threefold median increase), TAT (12-fold median increase), and D-dimer (sevenfold median increase), were all elevated in patients with terminal cancer compared to healthy individuals (Fig. 1 f–i). Contrary to our hypothesis, none of the coagulation and fibrinolysis markers were associated with poor prognosis in multivariate Cox regression (Fig. 2 ). Scatterplots showing plasma levels of markers of neutrophil activation, NETs, coagulation and fibrinolysis plotted against time to death are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2 A–I.

Association between markers of neutrophil activation, NETs, coagulation and fibrinolysis

To assess a possible association between neutrophil activation, NETs and coagulation/fibrinolysis, we compared correlations between NE and H3Cit-DNA with TAT, D-dimer, EV TF activity and PAI-1 (Table 2 ). NE and H3Cit-DNA were weakly but significantly correlated with D-dimer and PAI-1. NE, but not H3Cit-DNA, correlated with EV TF activity and TAT.

Medical treatment

Since there were no exclusion criteria, patients received various medical treatments, as would be expected in this patient population. Three of the 106 patients were administered oral anticoagulants (OAC; direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin), and 37 were administered LMWHs. The different levels of circulating markers for different categories according to medical treatment is presented in supplementary Table S4 . There was no difference in plasma biomarker levels between patients with prophylactic dose of LMWH compared to patients without anticoagulant treatment. Patients with a treatment dose of either LMWH or OACs had lower TAT levels and a trend towards lower D-dimer levels compared to patients without anticoagulant treatment ( P = 0.007 and P = 0.064, respectively). Patients with corticosteroids had lower IL-8 and PAI-1 levels compared to patients without corticosteroids ( P = 0.028 and P = 0.027, respectively).

Discussion

This study shows a clear association of markers of neutrophil activation and NETs with poor prognosis in patients with terminal cancer. We used a new and rigorously validated assay for measuring circulating H3Cit-DNA 35 , with results similar to our previous study 27 . Interestingly, we did not find an association between markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis and poor prognosis, despite the well-known association between cancer and thrombosis. There were furthermore weak or no associations between the NET marker H3Cit-DNA and markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, suggesting that neutrophils and NETs may play a role in poor clinical outcome independently of coagulation and fibrinolysis in these patients.

We found a strong correlation between plasma H3Cit-DNA levels and neutrophil activation marker NE. Since NET formation has been implicated in a wide range of malignancies 37 – 40 , and histone citrullination is considered key for NET formation 41 – 43 , neutrophil activation and NET formation thereby seem to be a likely source of circulating H3Cit-DNA. H3Cit-DNA levels furthermore correlated strongly with the platelet and endothelial activation marker sP-selectin. This correlation could either be due to direct platelet activation leading to NET formation 44 , sP-selectin inducing NET formation through P-selectin/PSGL-1 interaction 24 , or a consequence of NET formation, as NETs have been shown to capture and activate platelets 45 . IL-8 has also been shown to induce NET formation 25 , and, accordingly, H3Cit-DNA levels correlated with IL-8 levels. We cannot, however, exclude a tumor cell origin of H3Cit-DNA complexes. Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), the enzyme responsible for citrullination of histones, has been shown to be expressed in various tumor cells 46 , and tumor cells expressing PAD4 have furthermore been shown to extrude NET-like structures containing citrullinated histones, including H3Cit 42 . Notably, in vitro experiments have shown that heparins remove histones from the chromatin backbone, leading to destabilization of NETs 45 . Neither prophylactic nor treatment dose of LMWH were associated with levels of H3Cit-DNA in our study. However, the circulating concentration of LMWH is likely lower than the concentrations previously shown to dismantle and destabilize NETs. In the above-mentioned paper, the authors found that a heparin concentration of ≥ 10 μg/ml (equal to ≥ 5000 IU/ml) but not 1 μg/ml dismantled NETs and lead to histone release (detected by immunoblotting). This concentration is likely orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations reached in circulation after administration of 4500 IU of LMWH once daily. In comparison, treatment dose of heparin after acute venous thromboembolism resulted in plasma concentrations of heparin between 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL (equal to 0.0004 to 0.0008 μg/ml) measured by protamine sulfate neutralization 47 .

The elevations of markers of neutrophil activation, NET formation, coagulation and fibrinolysis in our cancer patients compared to healthy individuals are consistent with prior studies 13 , 16 , 21 , 27 , 48 – 61 . Our data extend these findings to patients with terminal cancer, and show that markers of neutrophil activation and NETs are prognostic in our patients with terminal cancer. Since NETs have been proposed to be induced by inflammatory cytokines, the association between high levels of markers NETs and poor prognosis could be due to an inflammatory state, which has been linked to poor prognosis in cancer 62 .

None of the markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis were associated with poor prognosis in our patient population. This contrasts to several previous studies 13 – 15 , 18 – 20 , 22 , 23 . However, the patients in our study suffered from terminal cancer, with a median survival of 31 days, compared to a median survival of 264 days or longer in prior studies. In earlier stages of cancer, an activated coagulation indicates a poor prognosis. The majority of terminal cancer patients have an activated coagulation system, which may explain why markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis lack a prognostic significance in this setting.

We were surprised to find weak or no correlations between neutrophil activation and NET markers and markers of coagulation/fibrinolysis, despite numerous studies linking NETs to coagulation 45 , 63 – 65 . However, most of these studies employed murine models, and whether intact NETs directly activate the coagulation system is under debate 33 . Purified DNA and histones, but not intact NETs or reconstituted chromatin, have been shown to induce thrombin generation, questioning the procoagulant property of intact NETs 66 . Another recent study observed that intact NETs can occlude small vessels, and in some cases these microthrombi did not contain fibrin or von Willebrand factor 67 . Taken together, these data suggest that NETs may be linked to poor prognosis independently of coagulation, either due to direct endothelial toxicity 44 or coagulation-independent vascular occlusion 67 . We also observed an association between the neutrophil activation marker NE, but not the NET marker H3Cit-DNA, with TAT and EV TF activity. This suggests a stronger association between neutrophil activation and coagulation compared to the association between NET formation and coagulation in terminal cancer patients. Data from murine models 68 , 69 , as well as data from smaller studies in humans 70 , 71 support the hypothesis that extensive NET formation in cancer patients leads to cancer-associated arterial microthrombosis, presenting as multi-organ failure. In line with the above-mentioned study 66 , these NET-associated microthrombi may indeed be due to a mechanical obstruction rather than an activation of the coagulation cascade, in which case DNase may be an interesting and novel approach to alleviate cancer-associated microthrombosis and multi-organ failure in this patient population.

This study has some limitations. Since this was an exploratory study, the small sample size of the study hampers comparisons between tumor subgroups and associations between circulating markers and venous or arterial thromboembolism. The healthy control group was matched for age but not sex, however, this does not affect the main prognostic findings in the cancer group. Further limitations include possible bias and confounding factors (e.g. treatment). To minimize the bias that comes with dichotomizing continuous variables, we employed Cox regression including the circulating markers as continuous variables.

In conclusion, our results show that neutrophil activation and NET markers, but not markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, are strongly associated with poor prognosis in patients with terminal cancer. The lack of associations between neutrophil activation and NET markers and markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis furthermore suggest that neutrophils and NETs contribute to a poor prognosis through pathways not directly related to coagulation. Further and larger studies should investigate the potential of neutrophil activation and NET markers in the quest for clinical objective prognostic tools and novel therapeutic targets in patients with advanced cancer.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marie-Louise Ekeström (Stockholms Sjukhem) and Lena Gabrielsson (Clinical Research Center, Danderyd Hospital) for their assistance with inclusion of study participants.

Author contributions

H.W., S.L. and C.T. designed the study. K.A., Y.H. and C.S. performed the laboratory analyses. N.M., H.W., S.L. and C.T. supervised the study. A.R. and C.T. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This work was supported by grants from Karolinska Institutet research internship (AR), Coagulation research fund 245 of Karolinska Institutet (AR), the Jochnick Foundation (CT) and Region Stockholm clinical postdoctorial appointment (CT).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-84476-3.

References

1. Hui D, et al. Prognostication in advanced cancer: update and directions for future research. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:1973–1984. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04727-y.

2. Gripp S, et al. Survival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests, and self-rated anxiety and depression. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:3313–3320. doi: 10.1200/jco.2006.10.5411.

3. Glare P. A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ. 2003;327:195–190. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.195.

4. Maltoni M, et al. Successful validation of the palliative prognostic score in terminally ill cancer patients. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 1999;17:240–247. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00146-8.

5. Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S. The Palliative Prognostic Index: a scoring system for survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1999;7:128–133. doi: 10.1007/s005200050242.

6. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2003;89:1028–1030. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601242.

7. Templeton AJ, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju124.

8. Rickles FR, Falanga A. Coagulation in Cancer. Boston: Springer; 2009. pp. 31–41.

9. Walker AJ, Card TR, West J, Crooks C, Grainge MJ. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer—a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur. J. Cancer. 2013;49:1404–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.021.

10. Horsted F, West J, Grainge MJ. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001275.

11. Pabinger I, et al. A clinical prediction model for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a development and validation study in two independent prospective cohorts. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e289–e298. doi: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30063-2.

12. Ay C, et al. High plasma levels of soluble P-selectin are predictive of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS) Blood. 2008;112:2703–2708. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-142422.

13. Ferroni P, et al. Plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels in breast cancer—relationship with clinical outcome. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:1153–1161.

14. Ay C, et al. High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Haematologica. 2012;97:1158–1164. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.054718.

15. Dovnik NF, Takac I. Prognostic significance of uPA/PAI-1 level, HER2 status, and traditional histologic factors for survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. Radiol. Oncol. 2017;51:65–73. doi: 10.1515/raon-2016-0024.

16. Palmirotta R, et al. Prognostic value of pre-surgical plasma PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) levels in breast cancer. Thromb. Res. 2009;124:403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.02.014.

17. Ferroni P, et al. Prognostic value of soluble P-selectin levels in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2004;111:404–408. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20189.

18. Zhang C, Jia Y, Jia Y, Zhang X, Li K. Prognostic and predictive value of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1320-5.

19. Oya M, Akiyama Y, Okuyama T, Ishikawa H. High preoperative plasma D-dimer level is associated with advanced tumor stage and short survival after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;31:388–394. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hye075.

20. Xu L, et al. A high plasma D-dimer level predicts poor prognosis in gynecological tumors in East Asia area: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:51551–51558. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17936.

21. Hisada Y, Thalin C, Lundstrom S, Wallen H, Mackman N. Comparison of microvesicle tissue factor activity in non-cancer severely ill patients and cancer patients. Thromb. Res. 2018;165:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.03.001.

22. Tesselaar MET, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity: a link between cancer and thrombosis? J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH. 2007;5:520–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02369.x.

23. Thaler J, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity, venous thromboembolism and mortality in pancreatic, gastric, colorectal and brain cancer patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH. 2012;10:1363–1370. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04754.x.

24. Etulain J, et al. P-selectin promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation in mice. Blood. 2015;126:242–246. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-624023.

25. Alfaro C, et al. Tumor-produced interleukin-8 attracts human myeloid-derived suppressor cells and elicits extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2016;22:3924–3936. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2463.

26. Demers M, et al. Cancers predispose neutrophils to release extracellular DNA traps that contribute to cancer-associated thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:13076–13081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200419109.

27. Thalin C, et al. Citrullinated histone H3 as a novel prognostic blood marker in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191231.

28. Sanmamed MF, et al. Serum interleukin-8 reflects tumor burden and treatment response across malignancies of multiple tissue origins. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2014;20:5697–5707. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-3203.

29. Reitter EM, et al. Longitudinal analysis of hemostasis biomarkers in cancer patients during antitumor treatment. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH. 2016;14:294–305. doi: 10.1111/jth.13218.

30. Di Nisio M, Niers TM, Reitsma PH, Buller HR. Plasma cytokine and P-selectin levels in advanced malignancy: prognostic value and impact of low-molecular weight heparin administration. Cancer. 2005;104:2275–2281. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21485.

31. Foekens JA, et al. The prognostic value of polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase in patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:337–341.

32. Grilz E, et al. Citrullinated histone H3, a biomarker for neutrophil extracellular trap formation, predicts the risk of mortality in patients with cancer. Br. J. Haematol. 2019 doi: 10.1111/bjh.15906.

33. Thalin C, Hisada Y, Lundstrom S, Mackman N, Wallen H. Neutrophil extracellular traps: villains and targets in arterial, venous, and cancer-associated thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.119.312463.

34. Hisada Y, Mackman N. Cancer-associated pathways and biomarkers of venous thrombosis. Blood. 2017 doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-743211.

35. Thålin C, et al. Quantification of citrullinated histones: Development of an improved assay to reliably quantify nucleosomal H3Cit in human plasma. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jth.15003.

36. Hisada Y, Mackman N. Measurement of tissue factor activity in extracellular vesicles from human plasma samples. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2019;3:44–48. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12165.

37. Arelaki S, et al. Gradient infiltration of neutrophil extracellular traps in colon cancer and evidence for their involvement in tumour growth. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0154484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154484.

38. Cools-Lartigue J, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps sequester circulating tumor cells and promote metastasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2013;123:3446–3458. doi: 10.1172/JCI67484.

39. Park J, et al. Cancer cells induce metastasis-supporting neutrophil extracellular DNA traps. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1711.

40. Najmeh S, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps sequester circulating tumor cells via beta1-integrin mediated interactions. Int. J. Cancer. 2017;140:2321–2330. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30635.

41. Li P, et al. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100239.

42. Leshner M, et al. PAD4 mediated histone hypercitrullination induces heterochromatin decondensation and chromatin unfolding to form neutrophil extracellular trap-like structures. Frontiers Immunol. 2012;3:307. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00307.

43. Wang Y, et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J. Cell Biol. 2009;184:205–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806072.

44. Clark SR, et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat. Med. 2007;13:463–469. doi: 10.1038/nm1565.

45. Fuchs TA, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:15880–15885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107.

46. Chang X, Han J. Expression of peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) in various tumors. Mol. Carcinog. 2006;45:183–196. doi: 10.1002/mc.20169.

47. Cruickshank MK, Levine MN, Hirsh J, Roberts R, Siguenza M. A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. Arch. Intern. Med. 1991;151:333–337. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400020085018.

48. Roselli M, et al. Soluble CD40 ligand plasma levels in lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2004;10:610–614. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0348-03.

49. Dymicka-Piekarska V, Matowicka-Karna J, Gryko M, Kemona-Chetnik I, Kemona H. Relationship between soluble P-selectin and inflammatory factors (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) in colorectal cancer. Thromb Res. 2007;120:585–590. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.11.002.

50. Majchrzak-Baczmanska DB, Glowacka E, Wilczynski M, Malinowski A. Serum concentrations of soluble (s)L- and (s)P-selectins in women with ovarian cancer. Prz Menopauzalny. 2018;17:11–17. doi: 10.5114/pm.2018.74897.

51. Benoy IH, et al. Increased serum interleukin-8 in patients with early and metastatic breast cancer correlates with early dissemination and survival. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2004;10:7157–7162. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-04-0812.

52. Ma Y, et al. IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-alpha levels correlate with disease stage in breast cancer patients. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. Off. Organ. Wroclaw Med. Univ. 2017;26:421–426. doi: 10.17219/acem/62120.

53. Vaguliene N, Zemaitis M, Lavinskiene S, Miliauskas S, Sakalauskas R. Local and systemic neutrophilic inflammation in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Immunol. 2013;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-14-36.

54. Gabazza EC, et al. Evaluating prethrombotic state in lung cancer using molecular markers. Chest. 1993;103:196–200. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.1.196.

55. Ozyilkan O, et al. Haemostatic changes; plasma levels of alpha2-antiplasmin-plasmin complex and thrombin-antithrombin III complex in female breast cancer. Tumori. 1998;84:364–367. doi: 10.1177/030089169808400310.

56. Kohli M, Fink LM, Spencer HJ, Zent CS. Advanced prostate cancer activates coagulation: a controlled study of activation markers of coagulation in ambulatory patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis Int. J. Haemost. Thromb. 2002;13:1–5. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200201000-00001.

57. Claussen C, et al. Microvesicle-associated tissue factor procoagulant activity for the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Thromb. Res. 2016;141:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.03.002.

58. Iversen N, Lindahl AK, Abildgaard U. Elevated plasma levels of the factor Xa-TFPI complex in cancer patients. Thromb. Res. 2002;105:33–36. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(01)00404-2.

59. Dai H, et al. D-dimer as a potential clinical marker for predicting metastasis and progression in cancer. Biomed. Rep. 2018;9:453–457. doi: 10.3892/br.2018.1151.

60. Chaari M, et al. Impact of breast cancer stage, time from diagnosis and chemotherapy on plasma and cellular biomarkers of hypercoagulability. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:991. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-991.

61. Ho CH, Yuan CC, Liu SM. Diagnostic and prognostic values of plasma levels of fibrinolytic markers in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 1999;75:397–400. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5610.

62. Dolan RD, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, Laird B, McMillan DC. The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with advanced inoperable cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017;116:134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.06.002.

63. von Bruhl ML, et al. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:819–835. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112322.

64. Stakos DA, et al. Expression of functional tissue factor by neutrophil extracellular traps in culprit artery of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:1405–1414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv007.

65. Wang Y, et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap-microparticle complexes enhance thrombin generation via the intrinsic pathway of coagulation in mice. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:4020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22156-5.

66. Noubouossie DF, et al. In vitro activation of coagulation by human neutrophil DNA and histone proteins but not neutrophil extracellular traps. Blood. 2017;129:1021–1029. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-06-722298.

67. Jimenez-Alcazar M, et al. Host DNases prevent vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps. Science (New York, NY) 2017;358:1202–1206. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8897.

68. Cedervall J, et al. Pharmacological targeting of peptidylarginine deiminase 4 prevents cancer-associated kidney injury in mice. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1320009. doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1320009.

69. Cedervall J, Zhang Y, Olsson AK. Tumor-induced NETosis as a risk factor for metastasis and organ failure. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4311–4315. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3051.

70. Thalin C, et al. Trousseau's syndrome, a previously unrecognized condition in acute ischemic stroke associated with myocardial injury. J. Investig. Med. High Impact Case Rep. 2014;2:2324709614539283. doi: 10.1177/2324709614539283.

71. Thalin C, et al. NETosis promotes cancer-associated arterial microthrombosis presenting as ischemic stroke with troponin elevation. Thromb. Res. 2016;139:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.009.

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information