Epidemic Spread and Control Strategies: A Spatial-individual Agent-based Modeling and Optimization Approach.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Traditional disease prevention strategies that rely on fixed parameters and macro-level models struggle to capture the diversity of individual behaviors and environmental complexities. Indoor spaces with high population densities and poor ventilation, such as schools and hospitals, are particularly vulnerable to pathogen transmission. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the need for precise intervention strategies.
METHODS
We developed a spatial-individual agent-based model that integrates fine-grained spatiotemporal dynamics, where transmission risk is quantified by the exact distance and duration of contact. This model was applied to a high-resolution case study of a university dormitory floor to evaluate various testing frequencies, scopes, and isolation intensities.
RESULTS
Simulations showed that a dormitory-wide isolation policy outperformed individual restrictions by protecting uninfected rooms. Counter-intuitively, every-three-day class-based testing lowered infection risks compared to daily class-based testing by minimizing high-density interactions. In spatially constrained environments, stricter isolation reduces the overall outbreak duration but increases the contact transmission rate among individuals sharing the same enclosed space.
CONCLUSION
Epidemic control in high-density environments requires balancing testing frequency and isolation stringency based on spatial constraints. Under strict isolation, frequent testing is vital for breaking transmission chains. In less restrictive settings, moderately reducing the testing frequency minimizes unnecessary contact. These findings provide data-driven guidance for optimizing public health policies on campuses.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.