MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2026.08.010

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiac failure · 2026

Development and Independent Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Noninvasive Venous Waveform Analysis for Heart Failure Device to Estimate Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure.

Alvis Bret D, Schmeckpeper Jeffrey, Rali Aniket S, Huston Jessica, Tsai Stacy, Amancherla Kaushik, Armstrong David, Gupta Richa, Mede Annmarie, Whitfield Jonathan S, Harder Rene, Miller Katharine, Horne Mackenzie, Wervey Dawson, Pein Romy, Isanaka Tara, Case Marisa, Gage Ann, Rajab Mohammad, Kumar Arnav, Haglund Nicholas, Abouzaki Nayef, Salinas Guillermo, Wise Eric, Perrien Bryce, Brophy Colleen, Lindenfeld Joann, Hocking Kyle

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic-guided management improves outcomes in heart failure (HF), but implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring is limited by cost and invasiveness. Noninvasive venous waveform analysis for heart failure (NIVAHF) is a machine learning-based device that estimates the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) from peripheral venous waveforms.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development and multicenter validation of the NIVAHF Device by evaluating agreement between the NIVA Score and invasively measured PCWP.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter study, peripheral venous waveforms were acquired noninvasively with the NIVAHF Device and analyzed by a supervised neural network using a 60:20:20 training, validation, and independent test allocation, with one site held out as the dominant contributor to the locked test cohort. Agreement between the NIVA Score and the invasively measured PCWP was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis in the locked, independent, right heart catheterization test cohort. Discrimination for elevated filling pressure (PCWP >15 mm Hg) was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis, with PCWP-left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure-LVEDP agreement analyzed for context.

RESULTS

In the independent right heart catheterization test cohort (n = 122), the NIVA Score showed a mean bias of -1.06 ± 5.57 mm Hg and 95% limits of agreement of -11.98 to 9.87 mm Hg vs the PCWP, falling between the invasive surrogate comparisons (PCWP-LVEDP, -9.31 to 7.54; pulmonary artery diastolic pressure-LVEDP, -14.85 to 8.63). The area under the curve for a PCWP of >15 mm Hg was 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.80; P < 0.0001; 89% sensitivity, 36% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

The NIVA Score demonstrated agreement with the PCWP, comparable with accepted invasive surrogates and detected elevated filling pressures with high sensitivity, supporting the NIVAHF as a noninvasive congestion marker in HF.

Для цитирования: Alvis Bret D, Schmeckpeper Jeffrey, Rali Aniket S, Huston Jessica, Tsai Stacy, Amancherla Kaushik, Armstrong David, Gupta Richa, Mede Annmarie, Whitfield Jonathan S, Harder Rene, Miller Katharine, Horne Mackenzie, Wervey Dawson, Pein Romy, Isanaka Tara, Case Marisa, Gage Ann, Rajab Mohammad, Kumar Arnav, Haglund Nicholas, Abouzaki Nayef, Salinas Guillermo, Wise Eric, Perrien Bryce, Brophy Colleen, Lindenfeld Joann, Hocking Kyle. Development and Independent Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Noninvasive Venous Waveform Analysis for Heart Failure Device to Estimate Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure.. Journal of cardiac failure. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2026.08.010.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.