Analytica chimica acta · 2026
A double-platform assay for rapid and on-site detection of chikungunya virus by integrating catalytic hairpin assembly with lateral flow immunochromatography assay.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Ruijie, Chen Dawen, Chen Ai, Ma Shuo, Yao Yuming, Chen Yaya, Abudushalamu Gulinaizhaer, Zhou Meiling, Li Xiao, Zheng Yue, Lu Wenjing, Wang Yueqi, Gao Xun, Zhang Chen, Wang Jiwei, Wu Guoqiu
Аннотация
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne pathogen posing a growing global threat, yet existing nucleic acid detection methods remain difficult to implement in resource-limited settings. In this study, we developed complementary catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA)-based lateral flow immunochromatography assay platforms for CHIKV nucleic acid detection by coupling CHA with time-resolved fluorescence immunochromatographic assay (TRFIA) and colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA). After systematic optimization of reaction conditions to reduce background leakage, CHA-TRFIA achieved a detection limit of 100 fM with a linear range of 100 fM to 1 μM (R2 = 0.976), whereas CHA-GICA showed a visual detection limit of 1 pM with a linear range of 1 pM to 1 μM (R2 = 0.947). Both platforms effectively discriminated CHIKV from mutant sequences and non-target viral sequences (dengue virus, Zika virus, Mayaro virus, Ross River virus, and Sindbis virus; P < 0.0001). In blinded trials using 100 pseudovirus-spiked human serum samples (50 positive and 50 negative), at 35 °C, CHA-TRFIA and CHA-GICA achieved sensitivities of 94% and 92%, with AUCs of 0.970 and 0.984, respectively; at room temperature, the corresponding sensitivities were 92% and 88%, with AUCs of 0.980 and 0.917, respectively. Specificity was 100% for both platforms under both conditions. Both platforms completed detection within 30 min. CHA-TRFIA is suitable for quantitative analysis, whereas CHA-GICA is more appropriate for rapid equipment-free visual screening, together providing a practical option for CHIKV testing in resource-limited settings.