JMA journal · 2026
Current Status of Generative Artificial Intelligence Utilization in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students and Faculty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ninomiya Shigeo, Yamamoto Kyoko, Mieno Eiko, Anai Hirofumi, Uemura Naoto, Kobayashi Takashi, Tanigawa Masato, Hirano Takashi, Saito Isao, Hanada Toshikatsu, Endo Yuichi, Matsunobu Yusuke, Tokuyasu Tatsushi, Ihara Kenji, Inomata Masafumi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Generative artificial intelligence (gAI), particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, is rapidly transforming various sectors, including medical education. Despite increasing interest, few studies have investigated how gAI is actually used in medical education settings, especially in Japan. This study aimed to assess the current use of gAI among medical students and faculty members, and to compare gAI usage patterns and attitudes between these two groups.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to May 2025 at the Oita University Faculty of Medicine. A total of 1,017 students and 470 faculty members from the School of Medicine, School of Nursing, and Department of Advanced Medical Sciences were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. The survey covered gAI usage experience, purposes of use, and attitudes toward gAI in academic contexts.
RESULTS: The response rates were 40% for students (402/1,017) and 74% for faculty members (350/470). Most students (82.1%) and faculty (73.4%) had prior experience using gAI tools, primarily for report writing, lecture preparation, and information retrieval, with students showing a higher rate of gAI usage experience than faculty (p < 0.05). While 92.8% of students and 86.5% of faculty supported gAI use under certain conditions, 73.4% of faculty members reported major concerns, including ethical risks and the risk of personal information leakage. In the faculty survey, younger faculty members, and those with gAI usage experience were also significantly more likely to approve the introduction of gAI into medical education (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: gAI is widely accepted and used in medical education. However, ethical guidelines, digital literacy education, and thoughtful integration strategies are essential to ensure its responsible use.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to May 2025 at the Oita University Faculty of Medicine. A total of 1,017 students and 470 faculty members from the School of Medicine, School of Nursing, and Department of Advanced Medical Sciences were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. The survey covered gAI usage experience, purposes of use, and attitudes toward gAI in academic contexts.
RESULTS: The response rates were 40% for students (402/1,017) and 74% for faculty members (350/470). Most students (82.1%) and faculty (73.4%) had prior experience using gAI tools, primarily for report writing, lecture preparation, and information retrieval, with students showing a higher rate of gAI usage experience than faculty (p < 0.05). While 92.8% of students and 86.5% of faculty supported gAI use under certain conditions, 73.4% of faculty members reported major concerns, including ethical risks and the risk of personal information leakage. In the faculty survey, younger faculty members, and those with gAI usage experience were also significantly more likely to approve the introduction of gAI into medical education (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: gAI is widely accepted and used in medical education. However, ethical guidelines, digital literacy education, and thoughtful integration strategies are essential to ensure its responsible use.