Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
Negative-pressure pumping fluid as a cytological specimen for bronchoscopic diagnosis and molecular testing in lung cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakayama Masayuki, Takasaki Toshikazu, Yanagita Miki, Suzuki Tomoko, Takigami Ayako, Yamauchi Hiroyoshi, Kurosaki Fumio, Hisata Shu, Mato Naoko, Yamamoto Shinichi, Bando Masashi, Hagiwara Koichi, Fujita Kazutaka, Maemondo Makoto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Small bronchoscopic biopsy specimens may be insufficient for molecular testing. Cytology preserves nucleic-acid quality but can be discordant with tissue-based malignant findings. We developed negative-pressure pumping fluid (NPPF), a cytological specimen generated from tissue by negative-pressure cycles, to enrich tissue-derived malignant cells.
METHODS: Patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively enrolled. Biopsy tissue, bronchial lavage fluid (BLF), and NPPF were collected. Malignant cell detection was compared across specimens, and agreement with tissue was assessed by concordance rates and Cohen's κ. Cytological quality was scored across five domains. In predefined subsets, nucleic-acid yields were compared before and after pumping, and mutation profiling using the MINtS assay was performed on NPPF and BLF when either specimen was cytology-positive.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were analysed. Concordance with tissue for malignant cell detection was higher for NPPF than for BLF (90.9% vs 71.7%; κ = 0.75 vs 0.35). The combined BLF/NPPF result, defined as positive when either specimen was positive, closely matched the conventional combined tissue/BLF result (94.9%; κ = 0.81). NPPF scored higher than BLF for minimal cell overlapping, background cleanliness, staining quality, and ease of focusing, whereas BLF showed more uniform cell distribution (all p < 0.001). Negative-pressure pumping increased nucleic-acid yields. In 33 cytology-positive cases, MINtS profiles were concordant between BLF and NPPF samples.
CONCLUSIONS: NPPF improved cytological quality and nucleic-acid recovery while preserving biopsy tissue. Its molecular utility requires validation, including direct tissue-NPPF comparison and cytology-negative cases.
METHODS: Patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively enrolled. Biopsy tissue, bronchial lavage fluid (BLF), and NPPF were collected. Malignant cell detection was compared across specimens, and agreement with tissue was assessed by concordance rates and Cohen's κ. Cytological quality was scored across five domains. In predefined subsets, nucleic-acid yields were compared before and after pumping, and mutation profiling using the MINtS assay was performed on NPPF and BLF when either specimen was cytology-positive.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were analysed. Concordance with tissue for malignant cell detection was higher for NPPF than for BLF (90.9% vs 71.7%; κ = 0.75 vs 0.35). The combined BLF/NPPF result, defined as positive when either specimen was positive, closely matched the conventional combined tissue/BLF result (94.9%; κ = 0.81). NPPF scored higher than BLF for minimal cell overlapping, background cleanliness, staining quality, and ease of focusing, whereas BLF showed more uniform cell distribution (all p < 0.001). Negative-pressure pumping increased nucleic-acid yields. In 33 cytology-positive cases, MINtS profiles were concordant between BLF and NPPF samples.
CONCLUSIONS: NPPF improved cytological quality and nucleic-acid recovery while preserving biopsy tissue. Its molecular utility requires validation, including direct tissue-NPPF comparison and cytology-negative cases.