Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
Experiences of Social Care Among People With Intellectual Disabilities From Minority Ethnic Communities in the UK: A Rapid Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jacobs Naomi L, Ribenfors Francesca, Hatton Christopher, Dunstan Lucy, Glasby Anne-Marie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disabilities from minority ethnic communities face intersectional disadvantage in social care. However, there is limited research on social care for these communities, with more studies focused on health care.
METHOD: This rapid review aimed to map UK research on the social care experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities from minority ethnic communities. A total of 19 studies (2009-2025) were synthesised.
RESULTS: While these communities face similar barriers to social care as majority communities, these are compounded by intersectional disadvantage, including difficulty navigating complex services, experiences of racism and lack of trust, and services that fail to meet cultural and religious needs. Limited support for family carers persists.
CONCLUSIONS: The sparse evidence base has limited demographic, topic and methodological diversity. Some evidence argues for relational, person-centred cultural competence in care. More research is needed on structural and intersectional inequalities, with participation of people with intellectual disabilities from diverse communities.
METHOD: This rapid review aimed to map UK research on the social care experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities from minority ethnic communities. A total of 19 studies (2009-2025) were synthesised.
RESULTS: While these communities face similar barriers to social care as majority communities, these are compounded by intersectional disadvantage, including difficulty navigating complex services, experiences of racism and lack of trust, and services that fail to meet cultural and religious needs. Limited support for family carers persists.
CONCLUSIONS: The sparse evidence base has limited demographic, topic and methodological diversity. Some evidence argues for relational, person-centred cultural competence in care. More research is needed on structural and intersectional inequalities, with participation of people with intellectual disabilities from diverse communities.