BMC microbiology · 2026
Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their effect on biofilm of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moghaddam Aytan Marandi, Ahmadishoar Shiva, Aval Sedigheh Fekri
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a growing threat in Iranian healthcare settings, and biofilm formation exacerbates treatment challenges. This study assessed the antibacterial and anti-biofilm potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles ZnONPs against 58 clinical MRSA isolates collected from hospitals in Iran.
METHODS: Isolates were identified via microbial and biochemical tests and confirmed by PCR targeting nuc (279 bp) and mecA (310 bp) genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated using CLSI disk diffusion guidelines. The ZnONPs were synthesized by chemical precipitation. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ZnONPs were determined by broth microdilution, and biofilm formation/inhibition was quantified using crystal violet staining.
RESULTS: Of 131 S. aureus isolates, 58 (44.3%) were MRSA, exhibiting high resistance to Penicillin (100%), Erythromycin (91.4%), and Ciprofloxacin (74.1%), but full susceptibility to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole. ZnONPs displayed potent activity, with MICs ranging from 8 to 1024 µg/mL (MIC₅₀ = 64 µg/mL; MIC₉₀ = 512 µg/mL); 27.6% of isolates were inhibited at ≤ 16 µg/mL. Among MRSA, 15.5% were strong biofilm producers, and sub-MIC (½ MIC) concentrations of ZnONPs reduced biofilm by 82.3 ± 7.6% (P < 0.001). Dynamic light scattering confirmed nanoparticle stability (size: 29.4 ± 4.2 nm; PDI: 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight ZnONPs as a promising, low-cost alternative for managing MRSA infections, particularly in biofilm-associated cases, warranting further clinical exploration in resource-limited settings.
METHODS: Isolates were identified via microbial and biochemical tests and confirmed by PCR targeting nuc (279 bp) and mecA (310 bp) genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated using CLSI disk diffusion guidelines. The ZnONPs were synthesized by chemical precipitation. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ZnONPs were determined by broth microdilution, and biofilm formation/inhibition was quantified using crystal violet staining.
RESULTS: Of 131 S. aureus isolates, 58 (44.3%) were MRSA, exhibiting high resistance to Penicillin (100%), Erythromycin (91.4%), and Ciprofloxacin (74.1%), but full susceptibility to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole. ZnONPs displayed potent activity, with MICs ranging from 8 to 1024 µg/mL (MIC₅₀ = 64 µg/mL; MIC₉₀ = 512 µg/mL); 27.6% of isolates were inhibited at ≤ 16 µg/mL. Among MRSA, 15.5% were strong biofilm producers, and sub-MIC (½ MIC) concentrations of ZnONPs reduced biofilm by 82.3 ± 7.6% (P < 0.001). Dynamic light scattering confirmed nanoparticle stability (size: 29.4 ± 4.2 nm; PDI: 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight ZnONPs as a promising, low-cost alternative for managing MRSA infections, particularly in biofilm-associated cases, warranting further clinical exploration in resource-limited settings.