JCO oncology practice · 2025
Prophylactic Interventions to Prevent Severe Skin Toxicities in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab + Ipilimumab With or Without Chemotherapy.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sumi Toshiyuki, Kanamaru Kaori, Tsuji Shunsuke, Kagawa Masahumi, Ishigooka Taiki, Matsuura Keigo, Ikeda Takumi, Yamada Yuichi, Chiba Hirofumi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The frequent occurrence of immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly dermatologic toxicities, often necessitates treatment modifications and systemic corticosteroid use, negatively affecting patient outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary prophylactic intervention on the incidence of severe skin toxicities among patients receiving nivolumab + ipilimumab (NI) with or without chemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 154 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC who received NI with or without chemotherapy. A comparison was made between skin toxicities and clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of a prophylactic intervention consisting of physician-prescribed medications, pharmacist-led patient education, and nurse-guided skincare. The primary end points were the incidence of grade 3 or higher skin toxicities, systemic corticosteroid use, and treatment discontinuation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities significantly decreased from 21% before the intervention to 8% after the intervention (P = .045). Systemic corticosteroid use and treatment discontinuation rates due to skin toxicities reduced from 36% to 10% (P = .0004) and from 21% to 4% (P = .0012), respectively. Patients with any grade of skin rash exhibited significantly improved PFS and OS compared with those without skin toxicities. However, grade 3 toxicities were associated with poor OS.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic interventions significantly reduced the severity of skin toxicities and enhanced treatment continuity in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy. These findings underscore the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary management strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 154 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC who received NI with or without chemotherapy. A comparison was made between skin toxicities and clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of a prophylactic intervention consisting of physician-prescribed medications, pharmacist-led patient education, and nurse-guided skincare. The primary end points were the incidence of grade 3 or higher skin toxicities, systemic corticosteroid use, and treatment discontinuation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities significantly decreased from 21% before the intervention to 8% after the intervention (P = .045). Systemic corticosteroid use and treatment discontinuation rates due to skin toxicities reduced from 36% to 10% (P = .0004) and from 21% to 4% (P = .0012), respectively. Patients with any grade of skin rash exhibited significantly improved PFS and OS compared with those without skin toxicities. However, grade 3 toxicities were associated with poor OS.
CONCLUSION: Prophylactic interventions significantly reduced the severity of skin toxicities and enhanced treatment continuity in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy. These findings underscore the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary management strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes.