Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025
The Impact of Postoperative Prophylactic Medication on Long-Term Surgical, Severe Endoscopic and Endoscopic or Radiologic Recurrence Following Primary Ileocecal Resection in Patients With Crohn's Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ten Bokkel Huinink Sebastiaan, Bak Michiel T J, Beelen Evelien M J, Erler Nicole S, Silverberg Mark S, Allez Matthieu, Hoentjen Frank, Bodelier Alexander G L, Dijkstra Gerard, Romberg-Camps Marielle, de Boer Nanne K H, Stassen Laurents P S, van der Meulen-de Jong Andrea E, West Rachel L, van der Woude C Janneke, van Ruler Oddeke, de Vries Annemarie C, Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC)
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The impact of prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) for Crohn's disease (CD) merits further elucidation. Prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) is recommended in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), particularly in patients at increased risk of recurrence, but the impact on long-term outcomes needs to be further elucidated.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic medication on long-term prognosis.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with CD who underwent primary ICR between 2000-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative prophylactic medication [< 12 weeks following ICR] versus no postoperative prophylactic medication. Outcomes were surgical recurrence [re-resection for CD], severe endoscopic recurrence [modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) ≥ i3] and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence [mRS ≥ i2b or radiologic recurrence]. Inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW] method was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Survival and association between postoperative prophylactic medication and outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: 807 patients underwent ICR (median follow-up 5.0 years); 36% received postoperative prophylactic medication. Surgical, severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence rates were significantly lower in those who received prophylactic medication (p = 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). IPTW analysis showed a lower risk of severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence in patients treated with postoperative prophylactic medication (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.97; aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.91), which also was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic (aHR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.6) and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence (aHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7) in multivariable analysis after correction for confounding factors. A comparable protective effect of postoperative prophylactic medication was sustained in patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy <1 year postoperatively and who underwent surgery on or after 2010.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic medication following primary ICR significantly reduces long-term recurrence rates in CD and was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic medication on long-term prognosis.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with CD who underwent primary ICR between 2000-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative prophylactic medication [< 12 weeks following ICR] versus no postoperative prophylactic medication. Outcomes were surgical recurrence [re-resection for CD], severe endoscopic recurrence [modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) ≥ i3] and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence [mRS ≥ i2b or radiologic recurrence]. Inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW] method was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Survival and association between postoperative prophylactic medication and outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: 807 patients underwent ICR (median follow-up 5.0 years); 36% received postoperative prophylactic medication. Surgical, severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence rates were significantly lower in those who received prophylactic medication (p = 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). IPTW analysis showed a lower risk of severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence in patients treated with postoperative prophylactic medication (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.97; aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.91), which also was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic (aHR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.6) and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence (aHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7) in multivariable analysis after correction for confounding factors. A comparable protective effect of postoperative prophylactic medication was sustained in patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy <1 year postoperatively and who underwent surgery on or after 2010.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic medication following primary ICR significantly reduces long-term recurrence rates in CD and was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence.