Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
[Dosage of presurgical cefazolin in obese and non-obese patients. Does weight matter?].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodríguez de Castro B, Martínez-Múgica Barbosa C, Pampín Sánchez R, Fernández González B, Barbazán Vázquez F J, Aparicio Carreño C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effectiveness of a standard dose of cefalozin 2 grams for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention in obese patients compared to non-obese patients. There is no still controversy surrounding which is the best dosage of this antibiotic in obese patients for surgical prophylaxis.
METHODS: Retrospective review of men who received prophylactic cefazolin between January 1st, 2019 and June 30th, 2019 in a traumatology department of a university hospital. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: obese (≥ 100 kg and body mass index (BMI)> 30 kg / m2) and non-obese. Patients without a 90 days follow-up after surgery and/or with an active infection at the time of surgery and/or treated with immunosuppressants were excluded. Demographic data, height, real weight, smoking, diabetes, concomitant use of immunosuppressants, surgery data and presence of infection until day 90 were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients underwent traumatic surgery with prophylactic cefazolin, 26 non-obese and 23 obese, were studied. Both groups presented statistically significant differences in weight, BMI and post-surgery use of cefazolin. No significant differences were observed in the other variables. Two obese (8.7%) and two non-obese (7.7%) patients developed SSIs after 63 days post-surgery on average, following the difference between the groups being statistically non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no significant difference in SSI with a standard prophylactic dose of two grams of cefazolin between obese and non-obese patients.
METHODS: Retrospective review of men who received prophylactic cefazolin between January 1st, 2019 and June 30th, 2019 in a traumatology department of a university hospital. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: obese (≥ 100 kg and body mass index (BMI)> 30 kg / m2) and non-obese. Patients without a 90 days follow-up after surgery and/or with an active infection at the time of surgery and/or treated with immunosuppressants were excluded. Demographic data, height, real weight, smoking, diabetes, concomitant use of immunosuppressants, surgery data and presence of infection until day 90 were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients underwent traumatic surgery with prophylactic cefazolin, 26 non-obese and 23 obese, were studied. Both groups presented statistically significant differences in weight, BMI and post-surgery use of cefazolin. No significant differences were observed in the other variables. Two obese (8.7%) and two non-obese (7.7%) patients developed SSIs after 63 days post-surgery on average, following the difference between the groups being statistically non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no significant difference in SSI with a standard prophylactic dose of two grams of cefazolin between obese and non-obese patients.