MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.10.015

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2013

Third-generation cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgery: what's the evidence?

Liu Weiming, Neidert Marian Christoph, Groen Rob J M, Woernle Christoph Michael, Grundmann Hajo

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To analyze the role of third-generation cephalosporins as prophylactic antibiotics in neurosurgery. We reviewed the literature for data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on third-generation cephalosporins compared to other antibiotic regimen in neurosurgery. End point of the RCTs was the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs)--data were pooled in a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Five randomized controlled trials enrolling a total of 2209 patients were identified. The pooled odds ratio for SSIs (overall) with third-generation cephalosporins prophylaxis in the five RCTs was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.59-1.52; P=0.81). No significant difference between third-generation cephalosporins and alternative regimen was identified. When analyzing organ SSIs (osteomyelitis, meningitis, and others intracranial infections) in data derived from four RCTs (1596 patients), third-generation cephalosporins failed to show superiority (pooled odds ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.45-1.74; P=0.72). Third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis fails to show superiority over conventional regimens regarding both incisional and organ related SSIs in neurosurgery.

Для цитирования: Liu Weiming, Neidert Marian Christoph, Groen Rob J M, Woernle Christoph Michael, Grundmann Hajo. Third-generation cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis in neurosurgery: what's the evidence?. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.10.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.