MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31822efa14

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2012

Efficacy of selective mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid agonists in canine septic shock.

Hicks Caitlin W, Sweeney Daniel A, Danner Robert L, Eichacker Peter Q, Suffredini Anthony F, Feng Jing, Sun Junfeng, Behrend Ellen N, Solomon Steven B, Natanson Charles

СтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroid regimens that stimulate both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid pathways consistently reverse vasopressor-dependent hypotension in septic shock but have variable effects on survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether exogenous mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid treatments have distinct effects and whether the timing of administration alters their effects in septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Desoxycorticosterone, a selective mineralocorticoid agonist; dexamethasone, a selective glucocorticoid agonist; and placebo were administered either several days before (prophylactic) or immediately after (therapeutic) infectious challenge and continued for 96 hrs in 74 canines with staphylococcal pneumonia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Effects of desoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone were different and opposite depending on timing of administration for survival (p = .05); fluid requirements (p = .05); central venous pressures (p ≤ .007); indicators of hemoconcentration (i.e., sodium [p = .0004], albumin [p = .05], and platelet counts [p = .02]); interleukin-6 levels (p = .04); and cardiac dysfunction (p = .05). Prophylactic desoxycorticosterone treatment significantly improved survival, shock, and all the other outcomes stated, but therapeutic desoxycorticosterone did not. Conversely, prophylactic dexamethasone was much less effective for improving these outcomes compared with therapeutic dexamethasone with the exception of shock reversal. Prophylactic dexamethasone given before sepsis induction also significantly reduced serum aldosterone and cortisol levels and increased body temperature and lactate levels compared with therapeutic dexamethasone (p ≤ .05), consistent with adrenal suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In septic shock, mineralocorticoids are only beneficial if given prophylactically, whereas glucocorticoids are most beneficial when given close to the onset of infection. Prophylactic mineralocorticoids should be further investigated in patients at high risk to develop sepsis, whereas glucocorticoids should only be administered therapeutically to prevent adrenal suppression and worse outcomes.

Для цитирования: Hicks Caitlin W, Sweeney Daniel A, Danner Robert L, Eichacker Peter Q, Suffredini Anthony F, Feng Jing, Sun Junfeng, Behrend Ellen N, Solomon Steven B, Natanson Charles. Efficacy of selective mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid agonists in canine septic shock.. Critical care medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31822efa14.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.