European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
A protocol proposal for safe dental anaesthesia in paediatric patients with allergic backgrounds: insights from a case series of allergic patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kondoz Torun Ç, Berkel G, Menteş A R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Paediatric patients with complex allergic backgrounds pose unique challenges in dental treatment requiring local anaesthesia (LA). This report aims to present a structured clinical approach for the dental management of paediatric patients with complex allergic backgrounds, including systemic mastocytosis, prior anaphylaxis, drug hypersensitivity, and latex allergy, using local anaesthesia (LA) in a hospital setting.
CASE REPORTS: This case series describes four paediatric patients with elevated hypersensitivity risks prior to the dentoalveolar treatment. All underwent multidisciplinary preoperative evaluations and received tailored management plans. Patient 1 (anaphylaxis history): treated with preservative-free mepivacaine with intravenous access and strict intraoperative monitoring. Patient 2 (systemic mastocytosis): received prophylaxis with oral H1-antihistamines and intravenous prednisolone before treatment with mepivacaine. Patient 3 (erythema multiforme and drug hypersensitivity): managed with lidocaine following a negative skin test, interpreted with caution. Patient 4 (latex allergy and asthma): latex-free protocols were applied, and lidocaine was used under controlled conditions.
CONCLUSION: Tailored prophylaxis strategies and the use of preservative-free amide-type anaesthetics were associated with uneventful outcomes in these cases. This structured approach highlights the importance of individualised emergency preparedness and interdisciplinary collaboration in high-risk paediatric dental procedures.
CASE REPORTS: This case series describes four paediatric patients with elevated hypersensitivity risks prior to the dentoalveolar treatment. All underwent multidisciplinary preoperative evaluations and received tailored management plans. Patient 1 (anaphylaxis history): treated with preservative-free mepivacaine with intravenous access and strict intraoperative monitoring. Patient 2 (systemic mastocytosis): received prophylaxis with oral H1-antihistamines and intravenous prednisolone before treatment with mepivacaine. Patient 3 (erythema multiforme and drug hypersensitivity): managed with lidocaine following a negative skin test, interpreted with caution. Patient 4 (latex allergy and asthma): latex-free protocols were applied, and lidocaine was used under controlled conditions.
CONCLUSION: Tailored prophylaxis strategies and the use of preservative-free amide-type anaesthetics were associated with uneventful outcomes in these cases. This structured approach highlights the importance of individualised emergency preparedness and interdisciplinary collaboration in high-risk paediatric dental procedures.