Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2006
[Clinical effect of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Zheng-gang, Tang Rui, Yan Min, Chen Jun, Yang Qiu-meng, Li Shen, Yao Xue-xin, Zhang Jun, Yin Hao-ran, Lin Yan-zhen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
METHODS: A total of 118 AGC patients with serosal invasion were enrolled in this study from 1998 to 2001. Among these cases, 96 patients without macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for prophylactic study, including 42 cases with IPHC and 54 cases without IPHC as control. Other 22 patients with macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for therapeutic study, including 10 cases with IPHC and 12 without IPHC. Postoperative survival rate and peritoneal recurrence were compared.
RESULTS: For prophylactic study, the 1, 2 and 4 years survival rates were 85.7%, 81.0% and 63.9% respectively in the patients with IPHC,significantly higher than 77.3%, 61.0% and 50.8% in the patients without IPHC. Cox ratio hazard model revealed that IPHC procedure was an independent prognostic factor. More patients in the control group suffered from peritoneal recurrence than those in IPHC group (34.7% vs 10.3%). For therapeutic study,the median survival period of the patients with IPHC was 10 months, higher than 5 months in the patients without IPHC. The overall 1, 2, 4 year survival rates were 76.9%, 69.2%, 55.2% respectively in all cases with IPHC, higher than 66.2%, 49.7%, 41.4% in the cases without IPHC.
CONCLUSION: IPHC procedure can improve the prognosis of AGC patients with serosal invasion, reduce the risk for peritoneal recurrence, and is an independent prognostic factor.
METHODS: A total of 118 AGC patients with serosal invasion were enrolled in this study from 1998 to 2001. Among these cases, 96 patients without macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for prophylactic study, including 42 cases with IPHC and 54 cases without IPHC as control. Other 22 patients with macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for therapeutic study, including 10 cases with IPHC and 12 without IPHC. Postoperative survival rate and peritoneal recurrence were compared.
RESULTS: For prophylactic study, the 1, 2 and 4 years survival rates were 85.7%, 81.0% and 63.9% respectively in the patients with IPHC,significantly higher than 77.3%, 61.0% and 50.8% in the patients without IPHC. Cox ratio hazard model revealed that IPHC procedure was an independent prognostic factor. More patients in the control group suffered from peritoneal recurrence than those in IPHC group (34.7% vs 10.3%). For therapeutic study,the median survival period of the patients with IPHC was 10 months, higher than 5 months in the patients without IPHC. The overall 1, 2, 4 year survival rates were 76.9%, 69.2%, 55.2% respectively in all cases with IPHC, higher than 66.2%, 49.7%, 41.4% in the cases without IPHC.
CONCLUSION: IPHC procedure can improve the prognosis of AGC patients with serosal invasion, reduce the risk for peritoneal recurrence, and is an independent prognostic factor.