DOI 10.1034/j.1399-5618.1999.10103.x
Perspectives on lithium treatment of bipolar disorder: action, efficacy, effect on suicidal behavior.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To review studies of (A) whether lithium has a prophylactic action in bipolar disorder, (B) the efficacy of prophylactic lithium treatment in comparison with the efficacy of treatment with anticonvulsant drugs, and (C) the effect of lithium treatment on suicidal behavior.
METHODS
Analysis of all relevant publications.
RESULTS
(A) The claim that a prophylactic action of lithium has never been satisfactorily demonstrated is based on wrong assumptions, biased selection of references, and unjustified generalizations. (B) In typical bipolar disorder lithium is significantly more efficacious than carbamazepine; in atypical bipolar disorder there is a non-significant trend for carbamazepine to be better than lithium. Valproate has not been proven prophylactically efficacious in typical bipolar disorder; in atypical bipolar disorder it may have an effect, but it has not been compared with that of lithium. (C) A significant association has been found between prophylactic lithium treatment, on the one hand, and reduced mortality and suicidal behavior, on the other. No such association has been reported for prophylactic treatment with other mood stabilizers.
CONCLUSION
In bipolar disorder the choice of prophylactic drug must be based on a weighing of efficacy against tolerability, interactions, ease of management, use during pregnancy and lactation, and expense. Lithium should be the preferred prophylactic drug in patients with typical bipolar disorder and in patients who are at high risk of committing suicide, that is, patients with severe depressions or depressions combined with persistent suicidal ideas or with suicide attempts in the past.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.