Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 1994
[Poor technique in the use of inhalation drugs by patients with chronic bronchitis/pulmonary emphysema].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van der Palen J, Klein J J, Kerkhoff A H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe errors in inhaler technique of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
SETTING: Outpatient clinic, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
METHOD: Adult COPD patients who already used an inhaler were asked to demonstrate their inhaler technique. Using a inhaler-specific checklist errors were registered. A division was made into good, adequate and inadequate technique. For each inhaler a selection of critical actions with regard to effective inhaler technique was made.
RESULTS: Inhaler technique was assessed in 123 COPD patients. Over one-third of all patients had a very poor inhaler technique, which probably resulted in little or even no drug deposition at all. 42% of the patients performed all essential inhaler actions correctly. For patients with a Diskhaler this was 86%, significantly higher than for the other inhalers, Rotahaler and Turbuhaler, which did not differ much (35% and 46%). Poor inhalation technique leads to insufficient bronchodilating or prophylactic effect, to the prescription of more or additional medication with a higher probability of side effects, and to increased costs.
CONCLUSION: The inhalation technique can be improved substantially with a good instruction protocol.
SETTING: Outpatient clinic, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Descriptive.
METHOD: Adult COPD patients who already used an inhaler were asked to demonstrate their inhaler technique. Using a inhaler-specific checklist errors were registered. A division was made into good, adequate and inadequate technique. For each inhaler a selection of critical actions with regard to effective inhaler technique was made.
RESULTS: Inhaler technique was assessed in 123 COPD patients. Over one-third of all patients had a very poor inhaler technique, which probably resulted in little or even no drug deposition at all. 42% of the patients performed all essential inhaler actions correctly. For patients with a Diskhaler this was 86%, significantly higher than for the other inhalers, Rotahaler and Turbuhaler, which did not differ much (35% and 46%). Poor inhalation technique leads to insufficient bronchodilating or prophylactic effect, to the prescription of more or additional medication with a higher probability of side effects, and to increased costs.
CONCLUSION: The inhalation technique can be improved substantially with a good instruction protocol.