m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Radiological physics and technology · 2026

Evaluation of the image quality index with MRI motion artifacts on tumor segmentation using deep learning.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Akanuma Masafumi, Usui Keisuke, Tsuchiya Ryoma, Maehara Eiichi, Fujita Keisuke, Choji Tatsuya, Sakakibara Daiki, Sakamoto Hajime, Kyogoku Shinsuke, Daida Hiroyuki

Аннотация

Motion artifacts substantially degrade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and can reduce diagnostic accuracy. Although deep learning-based segmentation has achieved high performance, the degree of motion-related degradation that begins to impair tumor contour delineation and the corresponding image quality criteria remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between image quality and the agreement of segmentation outputs obtained from original and motion-degraded MRI images in deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation and explored tentative reference values for image quality metrics. Tumor contours were manually delineated on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images from patients with glioma, and a segmentation model was tested. Motion artifact images were then generated through simulation, and the relationship between the generated tumor contours and image quality was analyzed. The tumor contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), while image quality was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). No strong correlations were observed between DSC and the evaluated image quality metrics. However, SSIM showed a positive association with visual assessment, suggesting that it better reflects tumor boundary visibility and perceived image degradation than other indices. In particular, an SSIM of 0.8 corresponded to a visual assessment score of 2 or higher, indicating a quality level at which observers can visually distinguish tumor boundaries. Because these findings may depend on the number of cases and the segmentation model used, further validation with clinical images is required to establish practical image quality criteria.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты