Knowledge, attitude, and practice of infection control in a dental hospital among dental students and practicing dentists-A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Infection control is an essential element in dental practice to avoid cross-contamination and safeguard patients and healthcare workers. Successful infection control depends on adequate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) among dental practitioners.
OBJECTIVE
This cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of infection control among dental students and practicing dentists in Puducherry, India.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A validated and structured questionnaire was filled out by 370 respondents, comprising dental undergraduates, postgraduates, and dentists in practice. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 16, and the Chi-square tests evaluating associations among the study variables.
RESULTS
The survey showed major knowledge gaps, where only 3.5% of the participants had sufficient knowledge, and 50% lacked proper understanding. Attitude was found to be largely positive (47.3%), and practice was assessed as good among 63.5% of the respondents. Female respondents showed significantly better knowledge (P < 0.05) than their male counterparts. Practicing dentists scored the best for attitude and practice, whereas undergraduates recorded the worst knowledge. Spearman's rho correlation revealed a positive correlation between knowledge, attitude, and practice (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
These findings highlight a critical need for improved infection control training among dental students and early-career professionals. Regular, comprehensive infection control education, coupled with periodic assessments, is essential for enhancing the overall safety and quality of dental care.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.