Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
Comparison of urethane dimethacrylate monomer elution between indirect composites when subjecting to thermocycling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hanifah Nur Amalia Mohd, Idid Sherrifah Nur Athirah A-Idid Syed Mohammed, Qaid Fatima Ahmed, Kassim Zethy Hanum Binti Mohamed, Ismail Ikmal Hisham Bin, May Lee Wei
Аннотация
CONTEXT: The use of resin-based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks is increasing in restorative dentistry. However, the potential elution of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) into saliva and its associated safety implications remain insufficiently investigated.
AIMS: To identify and quantify the monomer elution of two different indirect composite blocks before and after thermocycling.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro study.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two composite CAD-CAM blocks were investigated: a resin-based composite block (RCB, Shofu HC Block) and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network block (PICN, Vita Enamic). Twenty specimens from each material (n = 20) were prepared. All specimens (n = 40) were immersed in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 h before thermocycling. Extractions were performed after 24 h of immersion and subsequently after 500 and 10,000 cycles of thermocycling. UDMA monomer elution was analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: No quantifiable level of UDMA was observed in either RCB or PICN before thermocycling. After 500 cycles of thermocycling, UDMA elution was identified in RCB (0.04 mg/mL), but remained undetectable in PICN. Following 10,000 cycles of thermocycling, both RCB and PICN showed UDMA release of 0.01 mg/mL. However, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no statistically significant differences among groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The highest UDMA elution occurred in RCB after 500 cycles of thermocycling. Despite differences in polymer structure, thermocycling did not significantly influence UDMA release in either material.
AIMS: To identify and quantify the monomer elution of two different indirect composite blocks before and after thermocycling.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: In vitro study.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two composite CAD-CAM blocks were investigated: a resin-based composite block (RCB, Shofu HC Block) and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network block (PICN, Vita Enamic). Twenty specimens from each material (n = 20) were prepared. All specimens (n = 40) were immersed in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 h before thermocycling. Extractions were performed after 24 h of immersion and subsequently after 500 and 10,000 cycles of thermocycling. UDMA monomer elution was analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: No quantifiable level of UDMA was observed in either RCB or PICN before thermocycling. After 500 cycles of thermocycling, UDMA elution was identified in RCB (0.04 mg/mL), but remained undetectable in PICN. Following 10,000 cycles of thermocycling, both RCB and PICN showed UDMA release of 0.01 mg/mL. However, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no statistically significant differences among groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The highest UDMA elution occurred in RCB after 500 cycles of thermocycling. Despite differences in polymer structure, thermocycling did not significantly influence UDMA release in either material.