Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Far-Ultraviolet C Disinfection Reduces Oxidative Damage to the Cornea Compared to Povidone-Iodine Disinfection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Tu-Wen, Tsai Rong-Kung, Zou Cheng-En, Huang Chin-Te, Ali Maisam, Hsu Tzu-Chao, Lin Keh-Liang, Wen Yao-Tseng
Аннотация
Far-ultraviolet C (far-UVC) light shows promise for pathogen control but its safety and efficacy for corneal disinfection remain unclear. In this study, safe far-UVC dosages were investigated for corneal disinfection and its germicidal performance and oxidative damage potential to 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) were compared. Rat corneas were exposed to varying 222 nm far-UVC doses (3-60 mJ/cm2) and assessed for ocular damage, apoptosis, and oxidative stress to determine the safe dose of far-UVC. Far-UVC at 30 mJ/cm2 induced corneal apoptosis and oxidative damage, but 15 mJ/cm2 caused no apoptosis or oxidative damage. At this optimized dose (9 mJ/cm2), far-UVC achieved 90.5% sterilization, exceeding 5% PVP-I (80.8%), with significantly less oxidative damage and cell death in the cornea. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the use of 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) for disinfection results in significant oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. However, a safe dosage of far-UVC light exhibited a promising disinfection effect without causing oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. Far-UVC offers a promising alternative for corneal disinfection but requires careful dosage control (≤30 mJ/cm2) to avoid ocular surface harm.