How a community-engaged therapeutic garden immersion shapes rural intentions among medical students and strengthens student-community partnerships.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Rural workforce maldistribution persists, and short rural immersions that embed students in community life may strengthen rural intentions and deepen understanding of social determinants. This study examined a community-engaged, therapeutic gardening immersion as a novel place-based rural learning context in two Western Australian Wheatbelt towns.
METHODS
A mixed-methods design was used. A pre-placement survey of Year 3 medical students (n = 22) captured baseline intentions and preferences. Post-placement, semi-structured interviews were conducted with students (n = 22) and community members (n = 10). Interviews were analysed manually using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Most students reported high baseline rural interest (20/22 likely or very likely to pursue Rural Clinical School/rural electives), typically favouring regional or larger rural centres. Qualitative findings indicated that shared practical work rapidly dissolved social distance and fostered belonging; students described clearer insight into rural contexts and social determinants, and reflected on professional identity and rural career pathways, alongside generally positive personal growth. Community members reported visible outputs in a short time, students as social catalysts for renewed engagement, and a need for planning, materials and recurring cycles to sustain gains.
CONCLUSION
A brief, garden-centred immersion appears feasible and educationally valuable: it supports relationship-building, situated learning about determinants of health and professional identity work while delivering tangible community benefit. Programs should co-design tasks with hosts, plan logistics early and build ongoing partnerships; future work should track longitudinal student outcomes and community-level indicators to assess durability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.