MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/life16040661

Медицинская библиотека · Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Water Birth Compared with Conventional Vaginal Delivery: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study from Southeastern Europe.

Brezeanu Dragos, Brezeanu Ana-Maria, Stase Simona, Tica Vlad

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Water birth has gained increasing attention as an alternative childbirth method intended to promote maternal comfort and physiological labor while potentially reducing obstetric interventions. However, evidence regarding its maternal and neonatal safety compared with conventional delivery approaches remains heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth compared with conventional spontaneous vaginal delivery in a secondary obstetric center. By focusing on vaginal births, the study evaluates the specific impact of water immersion on perineal integrity and neonatal transition.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 3747 deliveries recorded at a tertiary maternity unit over a five-year period. Among these, 692 births occurred in water (water birth group) and 561 were conventional vaginal deliveries (land birth group), both managed under a standardized institutional protocol. Maternal characteristics, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal parameters were extracted from medical records and compared between the two cohorts. Primary outcomes included rates of episiotomy, perineal trauma and neonatal indicators such as Apgar score. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups using appropriate comparative tests.

RESULTS

Water birth was associated with a significantly lower rate of episiotomy compared with land birth (5.06% vs. 13.72%, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.50, p < 0.001). Neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores and NICU admissions, did not differ significantly between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort, water birth among selected low-risk pregnancies was associated with reduced obstetric intervention, particularly episiotomy, without evidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. These findings suggest that water birth may represent a safe and feasible option in carefully selected low-risk pregnancies when strict clinical protocols are applied.

Для цитирования: Brezeanu Dragos, Brezeanu Ana-Maria, Stase Simona, Tica Vlad. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Water Birth Compared with Conventional Vaginal Delivery: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study from Southeastern Europe.. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2026. DOI: 10.3390/life16040661.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.