Influence of Polishing Protocols on Surface Roughness and Color Properties of a Zirconia-Based Nano-Hybrid Resin Composite.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
This study evaluated the impact of polishing procedures on the surface texture and color stability of two nano-hybrid resin composites, with or without zirconia filler.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Cylindrical specimens (6 × 2 mm) were fabricated using a nano-hybrid resin composite containing zirconia (Forma, Ultradent) or a composite without zirconia (Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent). Specimens were subjected to two finishing and polishing protocols (n = 12): aluminum oxide abrasive disks (Sof-Lex, 3M) or disk-shaped abrasive rubbers (Jiffy, Ultradent). Roughness (Ra, µm) and color (CIEL*a*b* system, CIEDE2000, Vita shade guide units [SGU]) were measured at baseline, after polishing protocol, and after immersion in coffee solution.
RESULTS
were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures, along with Tukey-Kramer, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Nemenyi tests ( = 0.05).
Results
All groups exhibited an increase in Ra after polishing, with the highest values observed in specimens polished with abrasive rubbers (p < 0.05). SGU values significantly increased for both resin composites following coffee exposure, although the zirconia-based composite showed lower overall SGU changes (p < 0.05). After staining, Eab and E00 values were greater for the abrasive rubber groups compared to the aluminum oxide disk groups and were also higher for the non-zirconia resin composite compared to the zirconia-based material (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Polishing with aluminum oxide abrasive disks resulted in smoother surfaces and reduced susceptibility to staining. Nevertheless, the zirconia-containing resin composite demonstrated superior color stability regardless of the polishing method.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.