Consensus document on electroencephalography education in anaesthesiology: defining learning outcomes: A modified four-round Delphi study.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berger-Estilita Joana, Baron Shahaf Dana, Barreto Chang Odmara L, Bonhomme Vincent, Crisan Iulia, Fernández-Candil Juan L, Garcia Paul S, Gisselbaek Mia, Glezerson Bryan A, Hight Darren, Jakobsen Karina, Rimstad Ivan Jonassen, Kaiser Heiko A, Kratzer Stephan, Koch Susanne, Dilmen Ozlem Korkmaz, Kreuzer Matthias, Helfrich Janna, Lersch Friedrich, Lobo Francisco A, Marty Adrian P, Marcolino Isabel, Meco Başak C, Palanca Ben, Pilge Stefanie, Radtke Finn M, Rasulo Frank, Raz Aeyal, Romagnoli Stefano, Romero Carolina S, Schneider Gerhard, Sepúlveda Pablo O, Shmukler Daniel, Sinner Barbara, Soehle Martin, Thyrso de Lara Felipe S, Vacas Susana, Vide Sérgio, von Dincklage Falk, Saxena Sarah, Absalom Anthony R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To define a set of core learning outcomes for EEG education in anaesthesiology through expert consensus, aiming to support the development of a structured, tiered curriculum for both basic and advanced EEG training.
DESIGN: Modified four-round Delphi study.
SETTING: Multinational, online Delphi panel involving 33 anaesthesiology experts across various academic and clinical institutions. The study was conducted between 29 May 2023 and 28 November 2024.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three international anaesthesiology experts with recognised experience in EEG use, teaching and/or research. Experts were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in geography, clinical background, subspecialty focus and broad spectrum of perspectives.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus on learning outcomes, defined as at least 80% agreement (score of 9 or 10) on a 10-point Likert scale for Rounds 1 to 3, or at least 80% agreement for binary yes/no responses in Round 4.
RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 58 out of 191 learning outcomes across both basic and advanced EEG training levels. Accepted items were grouped into dimensions, including EEG Fundamentals, Raw EEG, Anaesthetic Effects, Processed EEG, Artefacts, Nociception, Patient Variability, Integration with Anaesthetic Management, Clinical Immersion and Continuous Professional Learning. Foundational dimensions had higher agreement than advanced or emerging areas, such as neurofeedback or pharmacogenomics.
CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus defines a comprehensive framework of EEG learning outcomes for anaesthesiology education. The framework supports the development of structured curricula and reflects a growing need for EEG competence in anaesthesia practice to improve patient monitoring and safety. Further research is needed to validate the outcomes in educational and clinical settings.