BMC oral health · 2026
Assessment of the surface characterization, physicochemical and biological properties of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with different ionic vehicles on diabetic root dentine: a laboratory investigation.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vinothkumar M, Sathvika P B, Nagarathinam S, Karthikeyan B Saravana, Mahalaxmi S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) mixed with distilled water (DW), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and disodium hydrogen phosphate (DSHP) on the root dentine of teeth affected by diabetes mellitus (DM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five samples of MTA were mixed with either distilled water (DW), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), or disodium hydrogen phosphate (DSHP). Then, they were assessed for surface characteristics using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (HRSEM-EDX), surface microhardness via Vickers indentation, and in vitro bioactivity after 21 days of immersion in simulated body fluid. For the other in vitro tests, 82 single-root human permanent premolars (nondiabetic = 41; diabetic = 41) were decoronated to a standardized length of 12 ± 1 mm. Following tubular density evaluation (n = 5) using HRSEM, push-out bond strength (n = 18) and fracture resistance (n = 9) were assessed using a universal testing machine, whereas the cement-dentine interface (n = 9) was analyzed using HRSEM-EDX. The root specimens were then randomly subdivided into subgroups based on the different ionic MTA formulations as follows: subgroup I: MTA + DW, subgroup II: MTA + PBS, and subgroup III: MTA + DSHP. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 10.4.1, using independent t-tests and two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for comparisons (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: MTA + PBS exhibited a uniform matrix with distinct crystalline structures and the highest microhardness (69.2 ± 3.97 VHN), followed by MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW test materials. All formulations promoted apatite formation, with MTA + PBS showing dense, homogenous platelet-like crystals. Tubular density was reported to be higher in diabetic dentine (P < 0.05). MTA + PBS demonstrated superior cement-dentine interface, push-out bond strength, and fracture resistance, followed by MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW in both DM and non-DM root dentine specimens (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: DM significantly affects the physicochemical and biological properties of root dentine. Among the various test ionic formulations, MTA + PBS exhibited superior surface characteristics, physicochemical, and biological characteristics compared to MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW. Hence, MTA mixed with phosphate ionic vehicles, is clinically recommended for effective endodontic management of diabetic dentine.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five samples of MTA were mixed with either distilled water (DW), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), or disodium hydrogen phosphate (DSHP). Then, they were assessed for surface characteristics using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (HRSEM-EDX), surface microhardness via Vickers indentation, and in vitro bioactivity after 21 days of immersion in simulated body fluid. For the other in vitro tests, 82 single-root human permanent premolars (nondiabetic = 41; diabetic = 41) were decoronated to a standardized length of 12 ± 1 mm. Following tubular density evaluation (n = 5) using HRSEM, push-out bond strength (n = 18) and fracture resistance (n = 9) were assessed using a universal testing machine, whereas the cement-dentine interface (n = 9) was analyzed using HRSEM-EDX. The root specimens were then randomly subdivided into subgroups based on the different ionic MTA formulations as follows: subgroup I: MTA + DW, subgroup II: MTA + PBS, and subgroup III: MTA + DSHP. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 10.4.1, using independent t-tests and two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for comparisons (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: MTA + PBS exhibited a uniform matrix with distinct crystalline structures and the highest microhardness (69.2 ± 3.97 VHN), followed by MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW test materials. All formulations promoted apatite formation, with MTA + PBS showing dense, homogenous platelet-like crystals. Tubular density was reported to be higher in diabetic dentine (P < 0.05). MTA + PBS demonstrated superior cement-dentine interface, push-out bond strength, and fracture resistance, followed by MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW in both DM and non-DM root dentine specimens (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: DM significantly affects the physicochemical and biological properties of root dentine. Among the various test ionic formulations, MTA + PBS exhibited superior surface characteristics, physicochemical, and biological characteristics compared to MTA + DSHP and MTA + DW. Hence, MTA mixed with phosphate ionic vehicles, is clinically recommended for effective endodontic management of diabetic dentine.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.