Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
Effects of gastric acid on surface roughness, microhardness, fracture strength, and color change of dental ceramics: A systematic review of in vitro studies.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodrigues Geany Ferreira, Nogueira Isaac Augusto Dantas, de Meneses Nicole Escórcio, Fontenele Ana Letícia Daniel, Silvestre Francisbênia Alves, Moreira Ana Carolina Lima, Fiamengui Lívia Maria Sales Pinto, Pontes Karina Matthes de Freitas, Peixoto Raniel Fernandes
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This systematic review evaluated the effects of simulated gastric acid (SGA) on surface and mechanical properties of dental ceramics to answer the research question: Does immersion in SGA alter the surface roughness, microhardness, fracture strength, and color of dental ceramics?
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Open Gray, and Google Scholar, in February 2025. Independent reviewers selected and analyzed in vitro studies assessing one or more outcomes-roughness, microhardness, fracture strength, or color-after acid exposure. Data were extracted independently, and risk of bias was assessed using the RoBDEMAT tool.
RESULTS: Out of 2,111 studies, 22 were included. Ceramics analyzed were lithium disilicate (n = 15), polymer-infiltrated feldspathic (n = 11), zirconia (n = 11), feldspathic (n = 8), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (n = 7), and leucite-reinforced (n = 4). Surface roughness changes were material-dependent, with feldspathic ceramics most affected and zirconia most stable. Microhardness generally decreased across ceramics. Fracture strength remained mostly unchanged, except for occasional reductions. Polymer-infiltrated ceramics and zirconia showed the greatest color stability. Specimen shapes and dimensions varied across studies, reflecting differences in study aims and testing protocols. Most studies showed appropriate outcome reporting, statistical analysis, and test standardization (>90%). However, operator blinding, when applicable, was not reported in any of the included studies. Randomization (> 87%) and sample size calculation (50%) were also frequently missing.
CONCLUSION: Surface, mechanical, and optical properties of ceramics were affected by acid exposure, varying by material. Zirconia and polymer-infiltrated ceramics show greater stability. Methodological heterogeneity limits conclusions, underscoring the need for standardized protocols and clinical validation.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Open Gray, and Google Scholar, in February 2025. Independent reviewers selected and analyzed in vitro studies assessing one or more outcomes-roughness, microhardness, fracture strength, or color-after acid exposure. Data were extracted independently, and risk of bias was assessed using the RoBDEMAT tool.
RESULTS: Out of 2,111 studies, 22 were included. Ceramics analyzed were lithium disilicate (n = 15), polymer-infiltrated feldspathic (n = 11), zirconia (n = 11), feldspathic (n = 8), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (n = 7), and leucite-reinforced (n = 4). Surface roughness changes were material-dependent, with feldspathic ceramics most affected and zirconia most stable. Microhardness generally decreased across ceramics. Fracture strength remained mostly unchanged, except for occasional reductions. Polymer-infiltrated ceramics and zirconia showed the greatest color stability. Specimen shapes and dimensions varied across studies, reflecting differences in study aims and testing protocols. Most studies showed appropriate outcome reporting, statistical analysis, and test standardization (>90%). However, operator blinding, when applicable, was not reported in any of the included studies. Randomization (> 87%) and sample size calculation (50%) were also frequently missing.
CONCLUSION: Surface, mechanical, and optical properties of ceramics were affected by acid exposure, varying by material. Zirconia and polymer-infiltrated ceramics show greater stability. Methodological heterogeneity limits conclusions, underscoring the need for standardized protocols and clinical validation.