Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2023
Bilateral Cornual Resection for Uterine-sparing Removal of Tubal Sterilization Devices.
Video-Audio MediaСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carey-Love Angelina, Orlando Megan S, Falcone Tommaso, King Cara R
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe a uterine-sparing minimally invasive surgical technique for laparoscopic resection of tubal occlusion devices using bilateral cornuectomy.
DESIGN: This video reviews the background of the tubal occlusion device known as Essure and the indications and methods for surgical removal with a stepwise demonstration of a minimally invasive technique with narrated video footage.
SETTING: The most cited reason for patients' desire for removal of the Essure device is pelvic pain. Both hysteroscopic and laparoscopic methods have been used for removal of these devices. Laparoscopy is indicated if it has been >3 months since insertion, if a coil is noted to be malpositioned, or if the patient desires continued permanent sterilization. Techniques for removal include salpingostomy, salpingectomy, and cornuectomy. Removal of the entire device is essential, given that any remaining coil or polyethylene terephthalate fibers may continue to cause symptoms. The coils of the device can easily be fractured; therefore, in our practice we perform a bilateral cornuectomy when uterine retention is desired Supplemental Videos 1 and 2, because fracture rates are higher with salpingectomy than cornuectomy. We demonstrate the steps of this method and highlight the critical aspects for surgeons to consider during the procedure.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic bilateral cornuectomy approach to a uterine-sparing excision of Essure tubal occlusion devices to reduce the risk of coil retention and fracture: 1) Injection of dilute vasopressin at the uterine cornua for vasoconstriction and hemostasis 2) Circumferential dissection of the uterine cornua using monopolar energy 3) Confirmation of endometrial cavity entry using methylene blue 4) Excision of fallopian tube along mesosalpinx to include the fimbriated end 5) Closure of the myometrial layers using a unidirectional barbed suture in a running fashion CONCLUSION: In patients who desire uterine preservation, we recommend a minimally invasive technique of bilateral cornual resection for removal of tubal sterilization devices to avoid device fracture and inadvertent retention of coils.
DESIGN: This video reviews the background of the tubal occlusion device known as Essure and the indications and methods for surgical removal with a stepwise demonstration of a minimally invasive technique with narrated video footage.
SETTING: The most cited reason for patients' desire for removal of the Essure device is pelvic pain. Both hysteroscopic and laparoscopic methods have been used for removal of these devices. Laparoscopy is indicated if it has been >3 months since insertion, if a coil is noted to be malpositioned, or if the patient desires continued permanent sterilization. Techniques for removal include salpingostomy, salpingectomy, and cornuectomy. Removal of the entire device is essential, given that any remaining coil or polyethylene terephthalate fibers may continue to cause symptoms. The coils of the device can easily be fractured; therefore, in our practice we perform a bilateral cornuectomy when uterine retention is desired Supplemental Videos 1 and 2, because fracture rates are higher with salpingectomy than cornuectomy. We demonstrate the steps of this method and highlight the critical aspects for surgeons to consider during the procedure.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic bilateral cornuectomy approach to a uterine-sparing excision of Essure tubal occlusion devices to reduce the risk of coil retention and fracture: 1) Injection of dilute vasopressin at the uterine cornua for vasoconstriction and hemostasis 2) Circumferential dissection of the uterine cornua using monopolar energy 3) Confirmation of endometrial cavity entry using methylene blue 4) Excision of fallopian tube along mesosalpinx to include the fimbriated end 5) Closure of the myometrial layers using a unidirectional barbed suture in a running fashion CONCLUSION: In patients who desire uterine preservation, we recommend a minimally invasive technique of bilateral cornual resection for removal of tubal sterilization devices to avoid device fracture and inadvertent retention of coils.