DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104562
An overview and critical analysis: A discussion paper on technological innovations in nursing education.
Аннотация
AIM: We aim to a) offer an overview of eXtended Reality (XR) and intelligent computing; b) present a framework to evaluate XR and intelligent computing in replicating real-world patient care experiences; and c) evaluate the qualities and abilities that XR and intelligent computing meet student's learning needs and capacity, producing safe, competent patient care and critical thinking skills.
BACKGROUND
Although hands-on simulation has been shown to be comparable to traditional patient care in attaining clinical and critical thinking skills, little is known is known about how well XR and intelligent computing meet the learning styles and preferences of students and attainment of procedural and critical thinking skills necessary to be safe competent health professionals.
DESIGN
Design-based research
METHODS
Identification of gap in use of immersive technology in teaching and generation of theoretical conjecture, reiterative conjecture and reflection on design principles and processes of teaching-learning.
RESULTS
XR provides varying levels of immersion, presence, interactivity and causability. XR is well suited for learning processes and procedures. Intelligent computer systems provide immersion, presence, interactivity, causability and adaptability. Intelligent computing may be better suited to support the development of critical thinking.
CONCLUSION
Nursing faculty need to consider which immersive technologies can provide a bridge between didactic and clinical experience that best supports experiential learning. Further research is needed to better understand pedagogical practices and strategies that are best suited for XR and intelligent computing to prepare safe, competent nurses.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.