Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
Could the sealer thickness affect the filling ability of bioceramic endodontic materials? Evaluation in a simulated physiological condition.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matallana Laura Issa, Santos-Junior Airton Oliveira, Tavares Karina Ines Medina Carita, Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves, Pinto Jáder Camilo, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Tanomaru-Filho Mário
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Bioceramic sealers must provide filling and dimensional stability over time.
AIMS: To evaluate by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the effect of sealer thickness on the physical properties of Bio-C Sealer (BCS) and BioRoot RCS (BR) after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 7 and 30 days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted bovine teeth were prepared with ProDesign Logic 40/0.05, and the last 4-mm apical of the roots was sectioned. Then, the specimens were filled using the single-cone technique with BCS or BR (n = 8), providing a smaller sealer thickness (ST) of the apical third and a greater sealer thickness (GT) of the cervical third. The samples were immersed in PBS for 7 and 30 days. After scanning by micro-CT, the volumetric change, material/dentin interface, and filling capacity were assessed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: ANOVA/Tukey, paired, and unpaired t-tests were performed (α =0.05).
RESULTS: Sealer thickness did not influence the filling capacity in all conditions tested. After 7 days, BR had a higher volume loss than BCS, with no influence of the sealer thickness. The volumetric loss and percentage of interface gaps were higher for both sealers with GT from 7 to 30 days of immersion. BR with GT showed a higher presence of interface gaps compared to the other groups in all the experimental periods.
CONCLUSIONS: GT negatively influences the volumetric change and presence of gaps in the material/dentin interface, especially for BR. Both materials demonstrate adequate filling ability regardless of the sealer thickness used.
AIMS: To evaluate by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the effect of sealer thickness on the physical properties of Bio-C Sealer (BCS) and BioRoot RCS (BR) after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 7 and 30 days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted bovine teeth were prepared with ProDesign Logic 40/0.05, and the last 4-mm apical of the roots was sectioned. Then, the specimens were filled using the single-cone technique with BCS or BR (n = 8), providing a smaller sealer thickness (ST) of the apical third and a greater sealer thickness (GT) of the cervical third. The samples were immersed in PBS for 7 and 30 days. After scanning by micro-CT, the volumetric change, material/dentin interface, and filling capacity were assessed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: ANOVA/Tukey, paired, and unpaired t-tests were performed (α =0.05).
RESULTS: Sealer thickness did not influence the filling capacity in all conditions tested. After 7 days, BR had a higher volume loss than BCS, with no influence of the sealer thickness. The volumetric loss and percentage of interface gaps were higher for both sealers with GT from 7 to 30 days of immersion. BR with GT showed a higher presence of interface gaps compared to the other groups in all the experimental periods.
CONCLUSIONS: GT negatively influences the volumetric change and presence of gaps in the material/dentin interface, especially for BR. Both materials demonstrate adequate filling ability regardless of the sealer thickness used.