Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Fluid Absorbency of Retraction Cord after Immersing in Two Alpha Adrenomimetic Medicaments-An In Vitro Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gurunathan Balamurugan, Rahangdale Tripty, Parpiyani Manisha, Ninan Reny K, Dhamane Arsh, Raghav Shivangi
Аннотация
AIM: The aim was to compare and evaluate the fluid absorbency of retraction cord after immersing in ZOAMETTM nasal decongestant and VIZOLINETM eye decongestant.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 90 pieces, each 50 mm long, were divided into three groups of 30. Group 1 consisted of untreated cords, while Groups 2 and 3 involved cords immersed in both solutions for 20 minutes, respectively. Further subgroups were divided based on immersion in artificial saliva and plasma. When immersed in medicaments, a significant difference in the absorption of fluids (artificial saliva and plasma) and between the two solutions was observed.
RESULT AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that both the agents are safe to be used for gingival retraction; among the two, VIZOLINETM gave more efficient results.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 90 pieces, each 50 mm long, were divided into three groups of 30. Group 1 consisted of untreated cords, while Groups 2 and 3 involved cords immersed in both solutions for 20 minutes, respectively. Further subgroups were divided based on immersion in artificial saliva and plasma. When immersed in medicaments, a significant difference in the absorption of fluids (artificial saliva and plasma) and between the two solutions was observed.
RESULT AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that both the agents are safe to be used for gingival retraction; among the two, VIZOLINETM gave more efficient results.