Stomatologiia · 2024
[Prevention of periodontal inflammation in microgravity modeling].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prokopovich L S, Ilyin V K, Drobyshev A Y
Аннотация
THE PURPOSE: Of the study was to assess oral microbiocenosis changes in participants of microgravity modeling in a control group and using prophylaxis in the form of a probiotic supplement with 1.0·109 CFU of Streptococcus salivarius strain in one lozenge and a dairy product containing not less than 1·107 CFU of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus strain in one gram.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 15 participants aged 25-40 years from the "Dry Immersion-2018" experiment. Five participants were included in the control group, while 10 participants were divided into 3 prophylactic groups: group I with 3 people (1 glass of dairy after evening teethbrushing and 1 glass of dairy after breakfast and teethbrushing). Group II with 3 people dissolving 1 probiotic lozenge at bedtime after teethbrushing and 1 lozenge after breakfast and teethbrushing. Group III with 4 people tested the synergism of protective streptococcus strains according to the scheme: 1 glass of dairy before nightsleep after teethbrushing and 2 probiotic lozenges under the tongue during the day. Changes were assessed by the dynamics of the Eubiotic Index and the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Need (CPITN).
RESULTS: A significant deterioration of the periodontal condition was recorded in the control group: a growth of supragingival and subgingival tartar, bleeding gums, and a growth of pathogenic microflora. In all three prophylactic groups, a positive shift was detected in Eubiotic Index. In groups I and II there were no changes on CPITN index scale, and in group III an improvement in periodontal condition was recorded.
CONCLUSION: The probiotic drug showed a positive prophylactic effect and found synergy with the dairy product based on the Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus strain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 15 participants aged 25-40 years from the "Dry Immersion-2018" experiment. Five participants were included in the control group, while 10 participants were divided into 3 prophylactic groups: group I with 3 people (1 glass of dairy after evening teethbrushing and 1 glass of dairy after breakfast and teethbrushing). Group II with 3 people dissolving 1 probiotic lozenge at bedtime after teethbrushing and 1 lozenge after breakfast and teethbrushing. Group III with 4 people tested the synergism of protective streptococcus strains according to the scheme: 1 glass of dairy before nightsleep after teethbrushing and 2 probiotic lozenges under the tongue during the day. Changes were assessed by the dynamics of the Eubiotic Index and the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Need (CPITN).
RESULTS: A significant deterioration of the periodontal condition was recorded in the control group: a growth of supragingival and subgingival tartar, bleeding gums, and a growth of pathogenic microflora. In all three prophylactic groups, a positive shift was detected in Eubiotic Index. In groups I and II there were no changes on CPITN index scale, and in group III an improvement in periodontal condition was recorded.
CONCLUSION: The probiotic drug showed a positive prophylactic effect and found synergy with the dairy product based on the Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus strain.