BMC health services research · 2024
Improving screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for unhealthy alcohol use in diverse, low-resourced primary care clinics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davis Melinda M, Coury Jennifer, Sanchez Victoria, Kenzie Erin S, Hiebert Larson Jean, Barnes Chrystal, McCormack James L, Durr Robert, Weekley Tiffany, Robbins Alissa, Singh Maya, Hatch Brigit A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Implementation of screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and medication-assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) remains low in primary care. ANTECEDENT (Partnerships to Enhance Alcohol Screening, Treatment, and Intervention) was a practice-facilitator led implementation study to increase SBIRT and MAUD use in diverse primary care clinics.
METHODS: From November 2019 - April 2023, we conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods evaluation. Participants were small and medium-sized primary care clinics in the Northwestern U.S. Clinics received foundational support (i.e., baseline/exit assessment, access to SBIRT Oregon website) and the option for supplemental implementation support (e.g., practice facilitation, expert consultation) over the 15-month intervention to improve SBIRT and MAUD. Qualitative and quantitative data regarding clinic characteristics, implementation strategies, and SBIRT/MAUD outcomes were collected through practice facilitator interviews, periodic reflections and clinic contact logs, interviews, pre-post surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) queries. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Wilcoxon sign-ranked test. Qualitative analysis took an immersion crystallization approach. Data were reviewed in a matrix to evaluate intervention adoption, implementation, and effectiveness.
RESULTS: We recruited 75 unique clinics; 66 participated and 48 (73%) completed the study. Eight participating clinics chose to receive foundational support only (12%) while 58 chose to engage in supplemental support (88%) activities. Clinics that received supplemental support and completed the intervention (n = 42) engaged in practice facilitation (Mean: 293 min, range: 75-550 min); data review (38%), HIT support (31%), expert consultation (19%), and peer-to-peer learning (5%). Pre- and post-intervention assessments showed significant improvement in self-reported SBIRT process outcomes. Performance data improved among the subset of completing clinics able to produce data (n = 17). Clinics described positive experiences with ANTECEDENT support and highlighted remaining barriers to SBIRT and MAUD implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Participating clinics engaged in a diverse range of supportive activities. A flexible approach using practice facilitation and implementation support could be helpful for low-resourced primary care clinics in improving SBIRT and MAUD for unhealthy alcohol use.
METHODS: From November 2019 - April 2023, we conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods evaluation. Participants were small and medium-sized primary care clinics in the Northwestern U.S. Clinics received foundational support (i.e., baseline/exit assessment, access to SBIRT Oregon website) and the option for supplemental implementation support (e.g., practice facilitation, expert consultation) over the 15-month intervention to improve SBIRT and MAUD. Qualitative and quantitative data regarding clinic characteristics, implementation strategies, and SBIRT/MAUD outcomes were collected through practice facilitator interviews, periodic reflections and clinic contact logs, interviews, pre-post surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) queries. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Wilcoxon sign-ranked test. Qualitative analysis took an immersion crystallization approach. Data were reviewed in a matrix to evaluate intervention adoption, implementation, and effectiveness.
RESULTS: We recruited 75 unique clinics; 66 participated and 48 (73%) completed the study. Eight participating clinics chose to receive foundational support only (12%) while 58 chose to engage in supplemental support (88%) activities. Clinics that received supplemental support and completed the intervention (n = 42) engaged in practice facilitation (Mean: 293 min, range: 75-550 min); data review (38%), HIT support (31%), expert consultation (19%), and peer-to-peer learning (5%). Pre- and post-intervention assessments showed significant improvement in self-reported SBIRT process outcomes. Performance data improved among the subset of completing clinics able to produce data (n = 17). Clinics described positive experiences with ANTECEDENT support and highlighted remaining barriers to SBIRT and MAUD implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Participating clinics engaged in a diverse range of supportive activities. A flexible approach using practice facilitation and implementation support could be helpful for low-resourced primary care clinics in improving SBIRT and MAUD for unhealthy alcohol use.