MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.28920/dhm54.3.184-187

Медицинская библиотека · Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2024

Retrospective analysis of challenging cases for medical examiners of diving.

Reus Inge, van de Sande Erik, Rienks Rienk, Wingelaar Thijs

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Assessing a diver's fitness to dive enhances diving safety, with medical examiners of diving (MED) being entrusted with this responsibility. However, the effectiveness of MED training in preparing physicians for this task remains underexplored. In the Netherlands, where any physician can pursue MED qualification, challenging cases can be presented to a board of experts.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included all cases presented to a board of experts in the period 2013-2023. Aside from baseline information, cases were coded using the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). Additionally, the type of advice given by the board was also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 291 cases could be included, 62.5% were male divers with a median age of 47 years old (interquartile range 29-55). Circulatory (20.9%), respiratory (16.2%), neurologic (14.4%), psychiatric (9.6%) and endocrine (6.5%) disease comprised more than two-thirds of all presented cases. Problems for the MED included multimorbidity, knowledge of guidelines and interpretation of diagnostic data.

CONCLUSIONS

These results could be used to improve MED courses or serve as a topic for continuing medical education for MEDs, however, further research into generalisability is required.

Для цитирования: Reus Inge, van de Sande Erik, Rienks Rienk, Wingelaar Thijs. Retrospective analysis of challenging cases for medical examiners of diving.. Diving and hyperbaric medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.28920/dhm54.3.184-187.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.