MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jrr/rrae055

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of radiation research · 2024

A potential usefulness of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography in quality assurance of remote after-loading system for cervical cancer.

Kinjyo Masashi, Nishie Akihiro, Kudaka Ryo, Nakano Shota, Ariga Takuro

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Intracavitary brachytherapy with a remote after-loading system (RALS) is performed as a part of radical radiation therapy in cervical cancer. The radiation source is delivered directly through an applicator placed inside the uterus or vagina. Thorough quality control is important to prevent accidents that can lead to serious irradiation error, and an applicator check is one such quality control measure. We experienced a clinical situation in which a small volume of water was observed in the lumen of a post-sterilized applicator on treatment-planning CT. Although the submersion test was negative and no air bubbles emerged from the applicator, ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) showed a linear crack reaching the inside of the applicator. This abnormality was not identified on treatment-planning CT, which has lower spatial resolution than U-HRCT. In addition, no linear cracks were seen on U-HRCT images of eight other applicators considered to be free from damage. U-HRCT may have superior potential to detect applicator damage and could be useful for quality assurance of the RALS procedure.

Для цитирования: Kinjyo Masashi, Nishie Akihiro, Kudaka Ryo, Nakano Shota, Ariga Takuro. A potential usefulness of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography in quality assurance of remote after-loading system for cervical cancer.. Journal of radiation research. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae055.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.