La Clinica terapeutica · 2019
Microbial contamination of brand new nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Passariello C, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, De Biase A, Gambarini G, Testarelli L
Аннотация
AIMS: This study aims to estimate the microbial presence on the surface of different brand new NiTi endodontic instruments for clinical use.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven different types of NiTi rotary endodontic instruments, obtained from their fresh opened original packages, were assigned to three different groups, according to packaging type and sterilization and tested for bacterial contamination. Isolated bacteria were identified by using standard microbiological methods and then counted. Differences observed in groups were analyzed statistically by using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for dependent samples and the Tukey HSD post hoc test.
RESULTS: Statistical differences were found between instruments delivered in plastic boxes which bacterial count resulted higher than those obtained from instruments delivered in blisters (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Some brand new endodontic instruments showed degrees of bacterial contamination that both quantitatively and qualitatively deserve to be considered in clinical procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven different types of NiTi rotary endodontic instruments, obtained from their fresh opened original packages, were assigned to three different groups, according to packaging type and sterilization and tested for bacterial contamination. Isolated bacteria were identified by using standard microbiological methods and then counted. Differences observed in groups were analyzed statistically by using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for dependent samples and the Tukey HSD post hoc test.
RESULTS: Statistical differences were found between instruments delivered in plastic boxes which bacterial count resulted higher than those obtained from instruments delivered in blisters (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Some brand new endodontic instruments showed degrees of bacterial contamination that both quantitatively and qualitatively deserve to be considered in clinical procedures.