Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
Alternating Hot-Cold Water Immersion Facilitates Motor Function Recovery in the Paretic Upper Limb After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chiu Yu-Ting, Liang Chung-Chao, Yu Cheng Hung-, Lin Chun-Hsiang, Chen Jia-Ching
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of alternating hot-cold water immersion (AHCWI) in patients with acute stroke.
DESIGN: A single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of a medical center.
PARTICIPANTS: Early stroke survivors (N=24) with moderate-to-severe arm paresis.
INTERVENTIONS: In addition to conventional rehabilitation, eligible patients were randomly assigned to an AHCWI group (n=12, for AHCWI) or a control group (n=12, for upper limb [UL] cycling exercises) 5 times per week for 6 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor-UL (FMA-UL) score, Motricity Index-UL (MI-UL) score, modified Motor Assessment Scale (MMAS; including its UL sections, MMAS-UL) score, Berg Balance Scale score, Barthel Index (BI), and modified Ashworth Scale score were assessed by the same uninvolved physical therapist at baseline and after 4 and 6 weeks of intervention.
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the AHCWI group performed better, with significant group effects (P<.05), and exhibited significant improvements in FMA-UL, MI-UL, and MMAS-UL scores at 4 and 6 weeks (P<.05). Although the remaining outcomes were not significantly different, they favored the AHCWI group. Notably, a significant difference was observed in the BI at 4 weeks (P=.032). Significant changes in the muscle tone or adverse effects were not observed in either group after the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: AHCWI with stroke rehabilitation is feasible and may facilitate motor function recovery of the paretic UL after a stroke.
DESIGN: A single-blind pilot randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of a medical center.
PARTICIPANTS: Early stroke survivors (N=24) with moderate-to-severe arm paresis.
INTERVENTIONS: In addition to conventional rehabilitation, eligible patients were randomly assigned to an AHCWI group (n=12, for AHCWI) or a control group (n=12, for upper limb [UL] cycling exercises) 5 times per week for 6 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor-UL (FMA-UL) score, Motricity Index-UL (MI-UL) score, modified Motor Assessment Scale (MMAS; including its UL sections, MMAS-UL) score, Berg Balance Scale score, Barthel Index (BI), and modified Ashworth Scale score were assessed by the same uninvolved physical therapist at baseline and after 4 and 6 weeks of intervention.
RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the AHCWI group performed better, with significant group effects (P<.05), and exhibited significant improvements in FMA-UL, MI-UL, and MMAS-UL scores at 4 and 6 weeks (P<.05). Although the remaining outcomes were not significantly different, they favored the AHCWI group. Notably, a significant difference was observed in the BI at 4 weeks (P=.032). Significant changes in the muscle tone or adverse effects were not observed in either group after the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: AHCWI with stroke rehabilitation is feasible and may facilitate motor function recovery of the paretic UL after a stroke.