Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2018
Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of various root canal disinfection methods against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. An ex-vivo study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghorbanzadeh Abdollah, Fekrazad Reza, Bahador Abbas, Ayar Roya, Tabatabai Siavash, Asefi Sohrab
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Complete elimination of bacteria and their by-products from the root canal system is very difficult with current techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial efficacy of different disinfection protocols against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms.
METHODS: Seventy-six extracted single-rooted human teeth were selected. Root canal preparation was done by proTaper rotary instruments. The smear layer was removed by 17% EDTA, followed by 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. After sterilization using gamma irradiation, sterilized specimens were inoculated with an E. faecalis suspension, incubated for 4 days and 4 weeks and then randomly divided into two experimental groups (4 days, 4 weeks old biofilms). After the confirmation of biofilm formation with SEM, the specimens in the experimental groups were randomly divided into five experimental subgroups according to the method of disinfection applied, which included: Diode laser irradiation (810 nm, 2 W), Light activated disinfection (LAD) with Indocyanine Green, 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2% CHX), 0.2% CHX + LAD and 0.2% CHX + Diode groups.
RESULTS: Complete biofilm bacterial elimination was not observed in either of the experimental groups. CHX + LAD (0.2%) method exhibited the highest reduction value in biofilm and only Diode alone revealed the lowest in all the root canal portions. Disinfection protocols also showed significantly lower antibacterial efficacy against 4-week old than the 4-day old matured biofilms (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: All the evaluated methods in this study were effective in the relative elimination of the E. faecalis biofilms except diode laser alone. Nevertheless, 0.2% CHX + LAD exhibited significantly higher efficacy in reducing both 4-day and 4-week old biofilms.
METHODS: Seventy-six extracted single-rooted human teeth were selected. Root canal preparation was done by proTaper rotary instruments. The smear layer was removed by 17% EDTA, followed by 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. After sterilization using gamma irradiation, sterilized specimens were inoculated with an E. faecalis suspension, incubated for 4 days and 4 weeks and then randomly divided into two experimental groups (4 days, 4 weeks old biofilms). After the confirmation of biofilm formation with SEM, the specimens in the experimental groups were randomly divided into five experimental subgroups according to the method of disinfection applied, which included: Diode laser irradiation (810 nm, 2 W), Light activated disinfection (LAD) with Indocyanine Green, 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2% CHX), 0.2% CHX + LAD and 0.2% CHX + Diode groups.
RESULTS: Complete biofilm bacterial elimination was not observed in either of the experimental groups. CHX + LAD (0.2%) method exhibited the highest reduction value in biofilm and only Diode alone revealed the lowest in all the root canal portions. Disinfection protocols also showed significantly lower antibacterial efficacy against 4-week old than the 4-day old matured biofilms (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: All the evaluated methods in this study were effective in the relative elimination of the E. faecalis biofilms except diode laser alone. Nevertheless, 0.2% CHX + LAD exhibited significantly higher efficacy in reducing both 4-day and 4-week old biofilms.