Comparing the EMMA capnograph with sidestream capnography and arterial carbon dioxide pressure at 284 kPa.

INTRODUCTION

Capnography aids assessment of the adequacy of mechanical patient ventilation. Physical and physiological changes in hyperbaric environments create ventilation challenges which make end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) measurement particularly important. However, obtaining accurate capnography in hyperbaric environments is widely considered difficult. This study investigated the EMMA capnograph for hyperbaric use.

METHODS

We compared the EMMA capnograph to sidestream capnography and the gold standard arterial carbon dioxide blood gas analysis in a hyperbaric chamber. In 12 resting subjects breathing air at 284 kPa, we recorded ETCO2 readings simultaneously derived from the EMMA and sidestream capnographs during two series of five breaths (total 24 measurements). An arterial blood gas sample was also taken simultaneously in five participants.

RESULTS

Across all measurements there was a difference of about 0.1 kPa between the EMMA and sidestream capnographs indicating a very slight over-estimation of ETCO2 by the EMMA capnograph, but fundamentally good agreement between the two end-tidal measurement methods. Compared to arterial blood gas pressure the non-significant difference was about 0.3 and 0.4 kPa for the EMMA and sidestream capnographs respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the EMMA capnograph performed equally to the sidestream capnograph when compared directly, and both capnography measures gave clinically acceptable estimates of arterial PCO2.