MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0972-0707.186457

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD · 2016

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on sterilization methods of extracted human teeth.

Western J Sylvia, Dicksit Daniel Devaprakash

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM OF THIS STUDY: The aim was to evaluate the efficiency of different sterilization methods on extracted human teeth (EHT) by a systematic review of in vitro randomized controlled trials.

METHODOLOGY: An extensive electronic database literature search concerning the sterilization of EHT was conducted. The search terms used were "human teeth, sterilization, disinfection, randomized controlled trials, and infection control." Randomized controlled trials which aim at comparing the efficiency of different methods of sterilization of EHT were all included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

Out of 1618 articles obtained, eight articles were selected for this systematic review. The sterilization methods reviewed were autoclaving, 10% formalin, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1% thymol, and boiling to 100°C. Data were extracted from the selected individual studies and their findings were summarized.

CONCLUSION

Autoclaving and 10% formalin can be considered as 100% efficient and reliable methods. While the use of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1% thymol, and boiling to 100°C was inefficient and unreliable methods of sterilization of EHT.

Для цитирования: Western J Sylvia, Dicksit Daniel Devaprakash. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on sterilization methods of extracted human teeth.. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2016. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.186457.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.