Fertility and sterility · 1997
Births after transcervical gamete intrafallopian transfer with a falloposcopic delivery system.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Porcu E, Dal Prato L, Seracchioli R, Petracchi S, Fabbri R, Flamigni C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a new delivery system to perform transcervical GIFT.
DESIGN: Evaluation of pregnancy rate (PR), miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.
SETTING: Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, Infertility and IVF Center.
PATIENT(S): Twenty-five patients with patent tubes documented by laparoscopy plus falloposcopy.
INTERVENTION(S): Superovulation was induced with GnRH analogue and FSH. Under laparoscopic control, transcervical cannulation of the tube was done using a linear everting catheter incorporating direct falloposcopic vision of the tubal lumen. Two lengths of everting catheter (3 and 6 cm) were used providing either isthmic-ampullary or midampullary placement of the inoculum. A comparison was done in terms of ease of access and transfer, falloposcopic observations, and PRs between the groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Efficacy was established by evaluating the PR, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.
RESULT(S): The PR was 28% (with no differences between the lengths of everting catheters). No ectopic pregnancies occurred. The abortion rate was 28.6% and the delivery rate was 20%. Neither tubal perforation nor other complications occurred during the procedure.
CONCLUSION(S): Falloposcopic GIFT is safe and efficient and may be a less invasive alternative than laparoscopic transfer.
DESIGN: Evaluation of pregnancy rate (PR), miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.
SETTING: Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, Infertility and IVF Center.
PATIENT(S): Twenty-five patients with patent tubes documented by laparoscopy plus falloposcopy.
INTERVENTION(S): Superovulation was induced with GnRH analogue and FSH. Under laparoscopic control, transcervical cannulation of the tube was done using a linear everting catheter incorporating direct falloposcopic vision of the tubal lumen. Two lengths of everting catheter (3 and 6 cm) were used providing either isthmic-ampullary or midampullary placement of the inoculum. A comparison was done in terms of ease of access and transfer, falloposcopic observations, and PRs between the groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Efficacy was established by evaluating the PR, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.
RESULT(S): The PR was 28% (with no differences between the lengths of everting catheters). No ectopic pregnancies occurred. The abortion rate was 28.6% and the delivery rate was 20%. Neither tubal perforation nor other complications occurred during the procedure.
CONCLUSION(S): Falloposcopic GIFT is safe and efficient and may be a less invasive alternative than laparoscopic transfer.