MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170220033004

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 1995

Outcomes of adolescents using levonorgestrel implants vs oral contraceptives or other contraceptive methods.

Dinerman L M, Wilson M D, Duggan A K, Joffe A

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes among adolescents who use levonorgestrel implants, oral contraceptives, or other methods of birth control.

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal study of 166 females who were followed up for 6 months. Fifty-four used implants, 64 used oral contraceptives, and 48 used condoms alone or with spermicide, or no contraceptive. Outcomes were measured by patient interview and medical chart review.

SETTING

Inner-city, hospital-based adolescent and teenaged mother and baby clinic between April 1, 1992, and May 31, 1993.

PARTICIPANTS

Sexually active 12- to 18-year-old females at least 1 year postmenarche who had no contraindications to use of hormonal contraceptives.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual activity, pregnancy rates, condom use, incidence of sexually transmitted disease, patient satisfaction continuation rates, and side effects.

RESULTS

Despite similar reports of sexual activity, one subject who used the implant (2%) vs 13 subjects who used oral contraceptives (20%), and eight subjects who used other methods (17%) became pregnant (chi 2, P < .50). Condom use did not differ among groups (chi 2, P > .60). Overall, 30% of subjects contracted a new sexually transmitted disease; rates did not differ by method (chi 2, P = .92). Implant users were more likely than oral contraceptive users to continue their method (87% vs 50%; chi 2, P < .001) despite similar satisfaction scores (one-way analysis of variance, P = .52). Implant users were more likely to experience irregular menses, mood swings, acne, and hair loss (chi 2, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, the levonorgestrel implant is an effective method of pregnancy prevention and is associated with high satisfaction and continuation rates at 6 months. Implant users are not at greater risk than others for sexually transmitted disease. Health care providers should continue to stress the use of barrier methods to all sexually active adolescents.

Для цитирования: Dinerman L M, Wilson M D, Duggan A K, Joffe A. Outcomes of adolescents using levonorgestrel implants vs oral contraceptives or other contraceptive methods.. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 1995. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170220033004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.