MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91622-6

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1992

Oral contraceptive use and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Gram I T, Macaluso M, Stalsberg H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the relationship between oral contraceptive use and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

STUDY

DESIGN

In a prospective follow-up study of 6622 women participating in the Second Tromsö Study conducted in 1979 and 1980 in Tromsö, Norway, women aged 20 to 49 years answered a questionnaire regarding their smoking history, dietary habits, alcohol consumption, and oral contraceptive use. They were then followed for 10 years with data from the Pathology Registry of the University Hospital.

RESULTS

The age-adjusted incidence rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was 897 per 100,000 person years among noncurrent and 1295 per 100,000 person years among current oral contraceptive users as of 1979. After adjusting for age, marital status, smoking, and frequency of alcohol intoxication the relative rate for current users was 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.1), and the relative rate for past users was 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.8), as compared with those who had never used oral contraceptives before 1979.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the hypothesis that the occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is increased by oral contraceptive use.

Для цитирования: Gram I T, Macaluso M, Stalsberg H. Oral contraceptive use and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91622-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.